FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   TravelBuzz (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz-176/)
-   -   Do you ever regulate other passengers? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz/546929-do-you-ever-regulate-other-passengers.html)

chartreuse Apr 26, 2006 2:03 am


Originally Posted by remyontheroad
Back on topic...

I've never regulated anyone in the air, but I way too FREQUENTLY find myself regulating people on the ground who think that they don't have to wait on line.

Reminds me of a flight LHR-JFK a while back. Not waiting in line, but on the ground at least. I was in J, my seatmate seemed a nice enough chap, though not that frequent a flyer.

We land, deplane and are lined up in the immigration hall. He pulls out his cellphone, turns it on and starts fiddling.
Me - We're not allowed to use our cellphones here.
Him - I'm not using it, I'm just trying to get a signal.
Me - (indicating CBP officers) Do you want to try explaining that to them? :eek:

brassai Apr 26, 2006 8:34 am


Originally Posted by chrissxb
pilot saying it - its an opinion. its a rule when its written down somewhere.

Been following this thread with wonder and amusement.... NOW someone said something that I have to pipe in on... Pilot saying it is an "opinion" eh?? How's this for a written rule:

FAR 91.3(a): "The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for,
and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft."

What that says, how the FAA and the courts interpret this, and applying it to your statement: Pilot saying it (assuming it's the Pilot in Command) - it's the law. Period. Trumps the airline. Trumps the FAA. Everyone.

Now, having been there and done that, the PIC may have to explain him or her-self to the FAA and/or airline, but the point remains... on an airplane what the PIC says is law, not opinion.

Cheers,
D.

chrissxb Apr 26, 2006 8:44 am


Originally Posted by brassai

What that says, how the FAA and the courts interpret this, and applying it to your statement: Pilot saying it (assuming it's the Pilot in Command) - it's the law. Period. Trumps the airline. Trumps the FAA. Everyone.

Now, having been there and done that, the PIC may have to explain him or her-self to the FAA and/or airline, but the point remains... on an airplane what the PIC says is law, not opinion.

Cheers,
D.

I agree with you and bolded the most important part. ;)
do we know the pilot ptravel spoke to was on duty or just a pilot he met somewhere? ...

brassai Apr 26, 2006 8:48 am


Originally Posted by Jenbel
Why does Transport Canada have a rule on high speed departure below 10000 and the FAA (IIRC) leaves it at the discretion of individual airports?

Not arguing, just correcting misunderstandings in the spirit of the original post. FAR 91.117:
(a) Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, no person may operate an aircraft below 10,000 feet MSL at an indicated airspeed of more than 250 knots (288 m.p.h.).

Note this same FAR refers to lower speeds at lower altitudes and certain airspace classes.

PTravel Apr 26, 2006 9:15 am


Originally Posted by brassai
Been following this thread with wonder and amusement.... NOW someone said something that I have to pipe in on... Pilot saying it is an "opinion" eh?? How's this for a written rule:

FAR 91.3(a): "The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for,
and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft."

A non-commercially-licensed pilot who doesn't fly for the airline in question is providing an opinion.


What that says, how the FAA and the courts interpret this, and applying it to your statement: Pilot saying it (assuming it's the Pilot in Command) - it's the law. Period. Trumps the airline. Trumps the FAA. Everyone.
Except that your assumption is incorrect. J-M, who has been kind enough to participate in this thread, is a pilot, yes, but not a pilot-in-command of the commercial airliners which are the subject of this discussion.

PTravel Apr 26, 2006 9:17 am


Originally Posted by chrissxb
I agree with you and bolded the most important part. ;)
do we know the pilot ptravel spoke to was on duty or just a pilot he met somewhere? ...

This reminds me of the old game of telephone. ;)

I didn't speak with a pilot, I asked the FAs on the last UA flight that I was on.

J-M, who has been posting in this thread and provided his opinion, is a pilot, but doesn't fly commercial passenger jets.

J-M Apr 26, 2006 11:29 am


Originally Posted by PTravel
J-M, who has been posting in this thread and provided his opinion, is a pilot, but doesn't fly commercial passenger jets.

You got it right. I can only provide my opinion on the subject because I'm not PIC of the flight in question. When I do fly PIC, then my opinion becomes the law for the duration of that particular flight.

That said, I doubt you'll find a pilot interested in making something law through PIC power that is not specifically in the FARs or company SOP.

BoeingBoy Apr 26, 2006 12:01 pm

I know it's easy to think that all "personal electronic device" requirements are based on the possibility of electromagnetic interference with the a/c's electronics - look at the thread on cell phone use. But the Ipod/mp3 player is in the same classification as the seatbacks/traytables - preparation for the always possible emergency evacuation.

We don't want you listening to your Ipod because you might not hear emergency instructions. Plus that Ipod or other device could turn into a flying missile in the unlikely event of a crash.

Jim

brassai Apr 26, 2006 8:45 pm


Originally Posted by PTravel
Except that your assumption is incorrect. J-M, who has been kind enough to participate in this thread, is a pilot, yes, but not a pilot-in-command of the commercial airliners which are the subject of this discussion.

Ah... but I made no assumptions. I quoted an FAR regarding the comment that a pilot's comment is opinion only. It may be, but if he's making the comment in his capacity as PIC, it's law. I did not apply this to any specific comment.

D.

brassai Apr 26, 2006 8:52 pm


Originally Posted by BoeingBoy
... cell phone use.

Not to comment on what you said, or off any assumptions or opinions, but there is NO Federal Aviation Regulation that says you can't use any electronic device on any flight or at any phase of flight. Note... this also includes Cell Phones. Yep... there is NO FAR that says you can't use a cell phone on an airplane. There is an FAR that says the airlines can restrict the use of electronic devices, and even that one excludes 4 devices that even the airlines can't tell you to not use during takeoff and landing. Cell Phones are restricted during flight by the FCC.

D.

IceTrojan May 9, 2006 12:31 am

I had a moment that I SHOULD have regulated...

Almost full flight, sitting in my exit row 21D with no one in the middle. I notice a lateboarding pax walk all the way back... then forward to stow her bag overhead... then back (quick movements got my attention). Then out of nowhere she rounds the corner around me, says "'scuse me" and plops down in 21E. I KNOW that's not her seat, but then I'm like, "whatever, it's a short STL-ORD hop" and just brush it off (she does smell slightly though, of Korean-ness... and before you flame me, it's a fact that some Korean households have a particular smell to them, and this was it).

Well, just before landing, she wakes up, stands up and before I can reaction says "'scuse me" and rushes in front of me... snagging my power cord to my laptop while at it, and nearly rips my laptop from me :mad: ...?! I made it known that I was not happy, and I spent the next 15 minutes while descending vowing never to let a seat poacher prevail ever again :mad:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:54 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.