![]() |
Interesting Article
For those of us who enjoy first class travel, the latest from Forbes on the best first class seats out there for 2004.
http://www.forbes.com/lifestyle/2004...ml?partner=rss |
pretty accurate
Not that I have flown all of those first products (i have done SQ, UA, BA, and QF), but their ranking seems pretty consistent both with my experience and what I have read on FT.
I'm quite partial to the QF product and was a bit upset to see them not ranked higher, but admittedly part of my fondness towards it is where you are flying to when flying them! |
Thanks -- interesting article. Although really the difference is not so much in the "seats" (which pretty look more alike than different) but in the quality of the service. There are a lot of tie votes, with only Emirates standing alone at the top of the pile, so it is not as if the 12 or so airlines are ranked in a strict numerical sequence.
|
nothing to do w/ MP or UAL so to Travelbuzz it goes
thanks squeakr MOD UAL |
That's some valuable ranking system that gives equal value to Flat Beds and "turn down service".
|
Lufthansa and Air France's first class cabins are superior to Cathay Pacific and ANA's? :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
|
According to an April 2003 report from the Alexandria, Va.-based National Business Travel Association, less than 5% of business travelers fly first and business class, while more than 70% fly in restricted economy. But this tiny group is contributing to the majority of the airline's revenue. "These premium seats can account for 40% to 60% of the revenue, while they're practically giving away seats in the back," says Bennett. That may explain why airlines are moving to a revenue-based status instead of a strict flown-miles based one... On the rest of the article, I find too that the methodology is strange... Helicopter service offered by MH beats a limousine service hands down, and is much more valuable than turndown service... Every airline feed its pax, but not the same way etc. I agree with the 13 categories they use, but having a 0 or 1 mark for each is not quite right... But the advantage of this is the objectivity, while "FA friendliness" cannot be judged on a single flight (and I doubt forbes was willing to pay someone to do RTW in first class for the purpose of writing the article). |
Originally Posted by gleff
Lufthansa and Air France's first class cabins are superior to Cathay Pacific and ANA's? :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
I agree fully with AF's rating. The new F is just incredibly comfortable, you can really sleep on your belly (the way I sleep best). The whole cabin is much nicer than any airline. Everywhere else I almost get claustrophobic with all the high panels, not with AF. The cabin is airy, the colours are very elegant and the product is top of the line. |
"According to an April 2003 report from the Alexandria, Va.-based National Business Travel Association, less than 5% of business travelers fly first and business class, while more than 70% fly in restricted economy. But this tiny group is contributing to the majority of the airline's revenue. "These premium seats can account for 40% to 60% of the revenue, while they're practically giving away seats in the back," says Bennett."
I wondered for a long time if there was a case for a purely business and first class airline or is one already in existence? |
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:57 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.