Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Pet peeve of the day: crying babies on long hauls

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Pet peeve of the day: crying babies on long hauls

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2004, 6:14 am
  #46  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London
Posts: 18,404
Originally Posted by Applespider
!

But when a brat is continuously running up and down the aisle, kicking seatbacks, squealing, standing in the aisle trying to play with my laptop, then I get peeved. Fine, the kid's bored but it's not my job or the airline's to keep them amused. That's their carer's role and I fume when I see parents recline to get some shuteye (presumably they're so used to the racket they tune it out) and leave their little darling to disrupt everyone else.

Can you tell I had a squealer/laptop prodder last week on an LHR-SFO?
Good for you for actually making a differention!
LapLap is online now  
Old Sep 29, 2004, 8:55 am
  #47  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Providence, RI USA
Programs: NWA Lowly Silver ; Priceline Whore
Posts: 138
Originally Posted by LapLap
The main point being that children are MUCH more susceptible to earpain (it goes way beyond earache) when taking off or landing. There was hardly a time when I didn't suffer nosebleeds to go with them either... I remember the toughnut bully, the hardest kid in the school, being reduced to a wreck because of the pain.
What kind of parent voluntarily subjects their child to this?

I understand this doesn't happen to all children, but if I had a child, and they had a scream attack even once on an airplane... I'd be taking the train home and not flying with them again for a few years.

Their comfort and care would be more important than my leisure and convenience.
Sin5Cents is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2004, 10:10 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Phoenix
Programs: UA1k;HH Gold;MR Gold
Posts: 6,112
WEll have you had fun wasting more FT bandwith on this AGAIN ?


Get over it - kids fly. Personally I prefer the crying baby to the obnoxious drunk we all see too much of in Business and FC
jan_az is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2004, 10:14 am
  #49  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London
Posts: 18,404
Originally Posted by Sin5Cents
What kind of parent voluntarily subjects their child to this?

I understand this doesn't happen to all children, but if I had a child, and they had a scream attack even once on an airplane... I'd be taking the train home and not flying with them again for a few years.

Their comfort and care would be more important than my leisure and convenience.
Try telling a kid they can't go and see their relatives for Xmas because they were in pain the last time they went. The truth is most kids completely forget the pain a day or so after the event (you kind of recall it later as an adult).

Anyway, I though most American men had their groins mutilated as babies for one reason or another. Most parents seem to be able to overlook the comfort of their children relatively easily - the health benefits in this case are certainly debatable.
Even as a three year old, given the choice of a 2.5 hour flight to Spain or a three day trip by car and boat (and I'd get sick on both) I'd go with the ear pain and nosebleeds every time.
LapLap is online now  
Old Sep 29, 2004, 10:23 am
  #50  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 333
Originally Posted by LapLap
Try telling a kid they can't go and see their relatives for Xmas because they were in pain the last time they went. The truth is most kids completely forget the pain a day or so after the event (you kind of recall it later as an adult).

Anyway, I though most American men had their groins mutilated as babies for one reason or another. Most parents seem to be able to overlook the comfort of their children relatively easily - the health benefits in this case are certainly debatable.
Even as a three year old, given the choice of a 2.5 hour flight to Spain or a three day trip by car and boat (and I'd get sick on both) I'd go with the ear pain and nosebleeds every time.

Last edited by goingnow; Mar 9, 2010 at 7:33 am
goingnow is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2004, 10:57 am
  #51  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Formerly HPN, but then DCA and IAD for a while, and now back to HPN!
Programs: Honestly, I've been out of the travel game so long that I'm not even sure. Maybe Marriott Gold?
Posts: 10,677
Originally Posted by LapLap
Anyway, I though most American men had their groins mutilated as babies for one reason or another. Most parents seem to be able to overlook the comfort of their children relatively easily - the health benefits in this case are certainly debatable.
Circumcision = "groin mutilation"? Going to extremes a bit, aren't you? I can't believe this discussion is really necessary.
dchristiva is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2004, 2:42 pm
  #52  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Programs: AA, UA, SQ, VA, QF, AF, BA
Posts: 2,865
Interesting-I hadn't considered the ear pressure thing-that just makes the parents seem even worse IMO-not only are they willing to disturb everyone else, they are also willing to put their own "little darlings" through excruciating pain? Charming people!

There are such things as cars for visits to relatives--and planes work in both directions so Granny can fly herself out to visit. Other bratty behaviour is when the kid in the row just in front of you insists on standing on the seat facing you and staring, making faces, drooling. I agree with the person who said parents are used to tuning this stuff out and drift off to sleep--I think we should all feel free to wake them up and insist they control their brats. Why should we just sit back and put up with it while these selfish parents blissfully snooze? I am talking, BTW about long distance flights, not short hops to Florida, Spain, Gold Coast (fill in your geographical location).

And why don't the airlines catch on that there IS a market for a quiet adults only section on an aircraft. I don't care who sits in the back of the plane- I would gladly lug my carry on to the rear if it meant a kid-free zone. Except the toilets are also in the rear so you would have to put the kids in a zone near toilets. It's bad enough the kid travels for half price or 10% for a baby supposedly in paren't lap--though we all know said pParent will try to commandeer the adjacent seat for their kid though they don't want to pay for it. I think airlines should charge DOUBLE for kids considering the amount of trouble they cause!
Tiki is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2004, 2:43 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Programs: AA, UA, SQ, VA, QF, AF, BA
Posts: 2,865
Interesting-I hadn't considered the ear pressure thing-that just makes the parents seem even worse IMO-not only are they willing to disturb everyone else, they are also willing to put their own "little darlings" through excruciating pain? Charming people!

There are such things as cars for visits to relatives--and planes work in both directions so Granny can fly herself out to visit. Other bratty behaviour is when the kid in the row just in front of you insists on standing on the seat facing you and staring, making faces, drooling. I agree with the person who said parents are used to tuning this stuff out and drift off to sleep--I think we should all feel free to wake them up and insist they control their brats. Why should we just sit back and put up with it while these selfish parents blissfully snooze? I am talking, BTW about long distance flights, not short hops to Florida, Spain, Gold Coast (fill in your geographical location).

And why don't the airlines catch on that there IS a market for a quiet adults only section on an aircraft. I don't care who sits in the back of the plane- I would gladly lug my carry on to the rear if it meant a kid-free zone. Except the toilets are also in the rear so you would have to put the kids in a zone near toilets. It's bad enough the kid travels for half price or 10% for a baby supposedly in paren't lap--though we all know said parent will try to commandeer the adjacent seat for their kid though they don't want to pay for it. I think airlines should charge DOUBLE for kids considering the amount of trouble they cause!

Bottom line is: People who have kids should be prepared to make sacrifices for them--the rest of the world shouldn't!
Tiki is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2004, 3:43 pm
  #54  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: BOS
Programs: AA PLT, UA 1P
Posts: 217
I would not want to be a little child related to Tiki...
lhj1723 is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2004, 5:28 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,017
Originally Posted by Tiki
Bottom line is: People who have kids should be prepared to make sacrifices for them--the rest of the world shouldn't!
I hear a selfish tone: yes, people who have kids make enormous sacrifices, but civility demands many to make smaller sacrifices in all kinds of situations. I'll sacrifice a few seconds to give someone the time, or sacrifice my seat to accomodate a party traveling together, or sacrifice half of my cookies to split them with the grandmother seated next to me. What happened to the community spirit that used to pervade travel? Why do we have to be so nasty to each other?

I've been on plenty of planes with crying babies, but there are worse things about air travel. Like the TSA groping my breasts, for instance.
GradGirl is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2004, 6:35 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Phoenix
Programs: UA1k;HH Gold;MR Gold
Posts: 6,112
Originally Posted by Tiki
And why don't the airlines catch on that there IS a market for a quiet adults only section on an aircraft. I don't care who sits in the back of the plane- I would gladly lug my carry on to the rear if it meant a kid-free zone. Except the toilets are also in the rear so you would have to put the kids in a zone near toilets. It's bad enough the kid travels for half price or 10% for a baby supposedly in paren't lap--though we all know said pParent will try to commandeer the adjacent seat for their kid though they don't want to pay for it. I think airlines should charge DOUBLE for kids considering the amount of trouble they cause!
Actually there was an airline here in the US that tried all adult flights - I forget its name because it is out of business :-:
jan_az is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2004, 6:40 pm
  #57  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 333
Originally Posted by lhj1723
I would not want to be a little child related to Tiki...

Last edited by goingnow; Mar 9, 2010 at 7:33 am
goingnow is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2004, 7:51 pm
  #58  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: BWI
Programs: UA1P
Posts: 349
Originally Posted by goingnow
And what about an area for adults that pass gas?
Don't we have that now? Little rooms at the front and back?

The problem is getting people to take advantage of them...
catflyer is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2004, 7:56 pm
  #59  
JS
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: GSP (Greenville, SC)
Programs: DL Gold Medallion; UA Premier Executive; WN sub-CP; AA sub-Gold
Posts: 13,393
Originally Posted by Tiki
Interesting-I hadn't considered the ear pressure thing-that just makes the parents seem even worse IMO-not only are they willing to disturb everyone else, they are also willing to put their own "little darlings" through excruciating pain? Charming people!

There are such things as cars for visits to relatives--and planes work in both directions so Granny can fly herself out to visit. Other bratty behaviour is when the kid in the row just in front of you insists on standing on the seat facing you and staring, making faces, drooling. I agree with the person who said parents are used to tuning this stuff out and drift off to sleep--I think we should all feel free to wake them up and insist they control their brats. Why should we just sit back and put up with it while these selfish parents blissfully snooze? I am talking, BTW about long distance flights, not short hops to Florida, Spain, Gold Coast (fill in your geographical location).

And why don't the airlines catch on that there IS a market for a quiet adults only section on an aircraft. I don't care who sits in the back of the plane- I would gladly lug my carry on to the rear if it meant a kid-free zone. Except the toilets are also in the rear so you would have to put the kids in a zone near toilets. It's bad enough the kid travels for half price or 10% for a baby supposedly in paren't lap--though we all know said parent will try to commandeer the adjacent seat for their kid though they don't want to pay for it. I think airlines should charge DOUBLE for kids considering the amount of trouble they cause!

Bottom line is: People who have kids should be prepared to make sacrifices for them--the rest of the world shouldn't!
"There are such things as cars for visits to relatives" ... "I am talking, BTW about long distance flights, not short hops to Florida, Spain, Gold Coast (fill in your geographical location)"

You want me to drive 5,000 miles to visit relatives?

BTW, great-grandma (Mom's side) is in a retirement home and rarely even goes out for lunch in someone else's car. The last flight of her life was about 20 years ago. Grandma and grandpa are getting old, too and will probably not be visiting the kids in my house.

Two years ago I took my kids to Phoenix to visit their great-grandparents (Dad's side) whom they had never visited before. Last year, great-grandma died, and a week later I stood by the side of great-grandpa and watched him die. One of the things he said to me when I arrived at the hospital the previous day was "How are the kids doing?"

If I had followed the asinine advice of staying at home until the kids are old enough to satisfy some whiny strangers, those last hours with my grandfather would have been a bit sadder.

You people who hate children need to do two things: 1) put your money where your mouth is and start your own airline that bans children and 2) sterilize yourself so your hate doesn't propagate into the future.

Last edited by JS; Sep 29, 2004 at 8:03 pm Reason: spelling
JS is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004, 1:19 am
  #60  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by kcvt750
Four words of advice:

Bose Quiet Comfort Headphones
I agree. My BOSE, combined with some foam ear protectors (if the noise is really loud) and some great music make noisy 12-15 hour flights fly right by.

For a mere $300, I can't figure out why anyone who considers themselves a "frequent flyer" would be without them.

And yes, it must be time for the monthly "leave your kids at home until they are older and definitely don't let kids into J or F" thread.
FWAAA is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.