Virgin delays delivery of Airbus superjumbos
#1
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Siesta Key
Programs: AA EXP-1.6MM, Hilton Diamond, ManU & Chicago Bears #1 Fan
Posts: 9,697
#2
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: CLE,OH
Programs: UA 1K 3MM, AA Plat, F9 Elite, the later two thanks to Jeff $, HHdia, Mgold, WynDia, Choicepl, IHGDia
Posts: 1,405
Does anyone see a real market for a plane that will have a $10 billion investment only to carry so many passengers at a single time? I might be Boeing biased but the 7E7 really does look like a dreamliner next to the 380. CLE-LGW on a 757 is not the best but it sure is great to fly non-stop. I think the future is in a smaller plane not larger. Faster would be the key not bigger.
#3
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Philippines
Programs: CebGo 5J, Hilton Diamond, IHG Platinum, Alaska 100K
Posts: 4,696
Originally Posted by coplatua1k
I think the future is in a smaller plane not larger. Faster would be the key not bigger.
We need a cheap running concorde.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,642
Originally Posted by coplatua1k
Does anyone see a real market for a plane that will have a $10 billion investment only to carry so many passengers at a single time? I might be Boeing biased but the 7E7 really does look like a dreamliner next to the 380. CLE-LGW on a 757 is not the best but it sure is great to fly non-stop. I think the future is in a smaller plane not larger. Faster would be the key not bigger.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MSY (finally); previously NYC, BOS, AUH
Programs: AA EXP, 6MM; BA GLD
Posts: 17,196
Originally Posted by Globaliser
The 380 is basically aimed at the sort of route where some airlines already dispatch two or more 744s at the same time flying "wingtip to wingtip". If air traffic continues to grow at the rate at which it has, historically, there will be more and more of these routes. The big question for Airbus is whether that section of the market place is going to get big enough fast enough for it to recover its investment.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB Silver going for Gold
Posts: 21,751
Look in the SQ and VS forums
LAX claims it will be ready for the A380 by 2006. However, there is a report in Les Echos, a French financial paper, that the A380 is currently 10 tonnes overweight. VS does not want to experience teething troubles as it did with the A340-600 (sme 3 tonnes or more overweight).
Ironically, AF said it was consider delaying delivery of the A380 because parts of CDG terminal 2 may not be ready, and this was before parts of 2E, built to accomodate for the A380, collapsed.
Ironically, AF said it was consider delaying delivery of the A380 because parts of CDG terminal 2 may not be ready, and this was before parts of 2E, built to accomodate for the A380, collapsed.