FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   TravelBuzz (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz-176/)
-   -   Posting while flying... (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz/286918-posting-while-flying.html)

Dorian May 30, 2000 6:24 am

Posting while flying...
 
Anyone ever posted to FT while on an airplane in flight?

Dorian

BlondeBomber May 30, 2000 7:24 am

They must have more money than I do!

Flying Dutchman May 30, 2000 1:07 pm

Randy did an in-flight chat session a few years ago (?).

auh2o May 30, 2000 2:25 pm

BB-

My company has an agreement with GTE Airphone. No matter how long your call is there is a $15 cap. 4 hrs of net surfing from LAX-IAD is $15.

But at 9600, FT is just too slow.

MileJunkie May 30, 2000 2:49 pm

"...at 9600, FT is just too slow..."
Boy, I must be real old - still remember communicating at 2,400 bps.... http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/smile.gif

Flying Dutchman May 30, 2000 4:38 pm

[please delete]

[This message has been edited by Flying Dutchman (edited 05-30-2000).]

ryannel May 30, 2000 10:01 pm

I remember a few connections at 300 baud with my old 2400 baud modem. Talk about waiting for hours...

I get upset now when I can't connect higher than 19.2...

Although with 4 hours to kill on those transcon flights, I don't blame you for breaking out the computer, especially if business is paying a max of $15.

Ryan

NJDavid May 31, 2000 3:26 am

I have NEVER been able to get a connection to work on a GTE airphone. When you try to contact the one employee at Airphone, they say that my "uncommon brand" modems (Megahertz, 3Com, IBM, Toshiba, Motorola, etc.) were not compatible with their system.

I think they said they could get it to work with a Commodore 64.

I think I stopped trying.

belle3388 May 31, 2000 10:40 am

Yeah, lets have our own exclusive FT Mile High Club! lets talk.... http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/wink.gif

shadow May 31, 2000 10:51 pm

NJDavid, it worked with my TI/99A.. http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/smile.gif

NJDavid Jun 1, 2000 7:28 am

Shadow, TI 99A...I'm not familiar with that...is that a Timex Sinclair model number?
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/wink.gif

Mizu Jun 4, 2000 3:20 am

Shadow... do you have an Empower adapter for the TI? http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/wink.gif

[This message has been edited by Mizu (edited 06-04-2000).]

Dudster Jun 4, 2000 2:26 pm


Originally posted by MileJunkie:
"...at 9600, FT is just too slow..."
Boy, I must be real old - still remember communicating at 2,400 bps.... http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/smile.gif

Maybe just not an early adopter. I remember my first modem. It was 300 bps. It had no internal dialer and no carrier detect. You had to manually dial the phone and then flip a switch on the modem to bring it online once the other modem answered.

BlondeBomber Jun 4, 2000 3:04 pm

Well since we're into one nostalgia, I remember (actually still have it) a Zoom Modem with 118 (or very close to 118) and 300 baud that I used on my Apple II plus (a $5000 computer without a hard drive and only one single sided floppy!). It wouldn't always work on 300 so 118 was often used! Took forever to send simple text documents back and forth--but still faster than overnight courier.

BlondeBomber Jun 4, 2000 3:04 pm

Well since we're into one nostalgia, I remember (actually still have it) a Zoom Modem with 110/300 baud that I used on my Apple II plus (a $5000 computer without a hard drive and only one single sided floppy!). It wouldn't always work on 300 so 110 was often used! Took forever to send simple text documents back and forth--but still faster than overnight courier.

[This message has been edited by BlondeBomber (edited 06-04-2000).]

[This message has been edited by BlondeBomber (edited 06-04-2000).]


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:11 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.