|
What airlines are flying four engine jets right now?
I looked up today (in the Peak District in the north of England, if you care) and saw that two of the nine vapour trails I could see were clearly from four-engined jets. Given that airlines are using a fraction of their fleets, and not all the fleet will be four-engined, why would they be using their least efficient jets? When load factors are so low I’d have thought that’d be the worst thing they could do?
Long story short, which airlines are flying 4E and why? |
a lot of 747 freighters ... UPS, China Air, Atlas Air, Polar Air Cargo, Korean, Kalitta, Cargolux to name a few
FlightAware (desktop version) has the ability to display by aircraft type |
Still 343's and 346's flying, 744's, 748, 388.
|
when I checked the FlightAware "airborne types" list before posting the link above, I found over 60 744s, about a dozen 748s, four A340-300s, and exactly one each A340-500, A340-600, and A380
|
So why fly those flavours when presumably there’s more efficient aircraft in the fleet? Am I over-estimating the number of new aircraft in fleets?
|
There’s also the local question of who is flying these aircraft in and out of MAN. Not a cargo hub and not huge numbers of pax that would fit the essential category right now.
|
Originally Posted by roberino
(Post 32408191)
So why fly those flavours when presumably there’s more efficient aircraft in the fleet? Am I over-estimating the number of new aircraft in fleets?
Originally Posted by roberino
(Post 32408197)
There’s also the local question of who is flying these aircraft in and out of MAN. Not a cargo hub and not huge numbers of pax that would fit the essential category right now.
right now the only 4-engine jet in UK airspace that I can see is a UPS 747 en route from their Louisville/SDF hub to Cologne/CGN |
Originally Posted by jrl767
(Post 32408261)
I would again point you to FlightAware or FlightRadar24 if you want to check in real time right now the only 4-engine jet in UK airspace that I can see is a UPS 747 en route from their Louisville/SDF hub to Cologne/CGN |
Originally Posted by roberino
(Post 32408191)
So why fly those flavours when presumably there’s more efficient aircraft in the fleet?
|
Originally Posted by jrl767
(Post 32408261)
I would again point you to FlightAware or FlightRadar24 if you want to check in real time right now the only 4-engine jet in UK airspace that I can see is a UPS 747 en route from their Louisville/SDF hub to Cologne/CGN Good answer. A couple more considerations, even if you have other aircraft types on hand: 1. A 4-engine aircraft may allow a more direct/efficient flight path since no ETOPS issue. 2. Availability of aircraft-specific flight and ground crews. |
Originally Posted by Maxwell Smart
(Post 32410376)
1. A 4-engine aircraft may allow a more direct/efficient flight path since no ETOPS issue.
|
Originally Posted by LarryJ
(Post 32410602)
For the pedantic amung us, ETOPS does apply to 4-engine aircraft but it is far less restrictive.
|
speaking of "pedantic" ... :D
|
Originally Posted by YVR Cockroach
(Post 32410813)
Perhaps it should be termed contigent emergency diversion routing restrictions or some such since ETOPS is "Extended Twin-engine Operational Performance Standards". What also applies to >2 engine a/c is something new called Extended Diversion Time Operations.
BACKGROUND: Formerly the term ETOPS signified “Extended Range Operation with Two-Engine Airplanes.” ETOPS guidance has been used for over twenty years to allow twoengine airplanes in part 121 operations to deviate from the regulation that limited the distance these airplanes could fly from potential diversion airfields. With over twenty years of successful experience in ETOPS operations, improvements in aircraft technology and reliability, and the prospect of airline operations on routes of increasing distance and remoteness, the FAA and industry agreed that ETOPS guidance should be reviewed, evaluated for potential application to all airplanes, and codified in the regulations. Note that the changes can be characterized by the change in meaning of ETOPS to “Extended Operations” since these provisions have broadened to include aircraft with more than two engines and to include both part 121 and part 135 operations. These regulations were posted in the Federal Register on January 16, 2007, and can be accessed at: |
Just saw a CA 747 taking off from SHA. So they are flying around China still.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:33 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.