Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

When did water and coffee become "resort" amenities?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

When did water and coffee become "resort" amenities?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 2, 2019, 5:12 pm
  #16  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,731
Originally Posted by COSPILOT
I've never understood why people get so worked up about this. I don't care if its called a toilet paper fee. I simply look at the total cost and make a choice.
I get annoyed with these fees because of the deliberate effort made to hide the final cost. Prior to a recent change on Expedia, which is where I do much of my hotel research, Resort Fees were hidden at the bottom of the page, in the fine print, under "Fees you may be asked to pay at the hotel". It seems they improved pricing display to the point where the mandatory resort fees are now listed directly underneath room rates, making it easier to determine the final cost.
strickerj likes this.
CDTraveler is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2019, 2:28 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 3,360
Originally Posted by Efrem
Personally, I think it's a con, pure and simple - an attempt to advertise a rate that is lower than what guests will be required to pay. I'm not a huge fan of additional government regulation, but if the industry won't regulate itself that might be the only remaining option.
What puzzles me is why local government isn't stopping the resort fee nonsense. Aside from the consumer, the local taxing authority is the other group losing out. Anyone that travels even a small bit knows that hotel taxes are often much higher than sales taxes.

Everywhere I've been, those resort fees are taxed at the lower sales tax rate and not the higher hotel tax rate. When hotels shift part of their total cost into a resort fee, that means the local government gets less revenue.

I picked a large convention hotel in Orlando and ran the numbers. It's a 2,008 room hotel with a $30 resort fee. The sales tax is 6.5% and the hotel tax is 12.5%. Assuming a conservative 80% occupancy, the lost revenue for the local government due to the lower tax rate is $1,055,405.

That's just one property (although it is largest hotel in Orlando). Still, there are almost a dozen 500+ room hotels that charge resort fees $28 and $45/night. That's got to be tens of millions of dollars in lost revenue for the local taxing authority.

(I recognize the fact that eliminating resort fees might increase the overall rate paid by the guest. But, at least it would fix the annoyance of thinking you found a good rate only to discover that $45 resort fee added on.)
strickerj likes this.
writerguyfl is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2019, 1:05 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Programs: UA Gold (.85 MM), HH Diamond, SPG Platinum (LT Gold), Hertz PC, National EE
Posts: 5,648
Originally Posted by writerguyfl
What puzzles me is why local government isn't stopping the resort fee nonsense. Aside from the consumer, the local taxing authority is the other group losing out. Anyone that travels even a small bit knows that hotel taxes are often much higher than sales taxes.

Everywhere I've been, those resort fees are taxed at the lower sales tax rate and not the higher hotel tax rate. When hotels shift part of their total cost into a resort fee, that means the local government gets less revenue.

I picked a large convention hotel in Orlando and ran the numbers. It's a 2,008 room hotel with a $30 resort fee. The sales tax is 6.5% and the hotel tax is 12.5%. Assuming a conservative 80% occupancy, the lost revenue for the local government due to the lower tax rate is $1,055,405.

That's just one property (although it is largest hotel in Orlando). Still, there are almost a dozen 500+ room hotels that charge resort fees $28 and $45/night. That's got to be tens of millions of dollars in lost revenue for the local taxing authority.

(I recognize the fact that eliminating resort fees might increase the overall rate paid by the guest. But, at least it would fix the annoyance of thinking you found a good rate only to discover that $45 resort fee added on.)
Your post made me think about why airlines distinguish things under different fees, as I think you are correct, the tax rate for them changes. When I have more time I'll look into this. If this is to avoid higher local taxes then I'm all for it, even if it makes life more difficult for those that like to use OTA's. If it's only OTA's that create the problem, then take it up with them. Companies do everything possible to lower taxes paid, and that is how it should be.
COSPILOT is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2019, 8:03 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Programs: No single airline or hotel chain is of much use to me anymore.
Posts: 3,278
Originally Posted by YVR Cockroach
I have a 1-day layover in HNL and searched for a hotel. Pretty much everything (except for one property and that may be because it was hidden somewhere) had resort fees.
The one that doesn't is operated by an Australian hotel chain.
Error 601 is offline  
Old Mar 5, 2019, 12:53 pm
  #20  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,555
Originally Posted by CDTraveler
Looks to me like yet another a dishonest way to hide the actual room rate.
This is the sole purpose of a "resort fee", no matter what amenities are listed. The only intent is to deceive the customer, and it is only done because nobody has made the practice illegal and likely won't.

There's actually no real need for the hotel to bother listing amenities. That's just a little bit of halfhearted marketing, I guess.

It's not much different than an airline fuel surcharge, at least until Boeing or Airbus invent an aircraft that can optionally operate with or without fuel. The only difference there is that we *do* have sensible regulation that requires airlines to show a correct revenue fare (including their junk fees), limiting the deception to award redemptions, travel agents, and their corporate clients.
crabbing and strickerj like this.
pinniped is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2019, 12:22 am
  #21  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,731
Originally Posted by COSPILOT
Companies do everything possible to lower taxes paid, and that is how it should be.
No, companies should not avoid taxes by fraudulently misrepresenting their income, which is what calling a mandatory "fee" is when it is really part of the room rate.
strickerj likes this.
CDTraveler is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2019, 8:46 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Programs: UA Gold (.85 MM), HH Diamond, SPG Platinum (LT Gold), Hertz PC, National EE
Posts: 5,648
Originally Posted by CDTraveler
No, companies should not avoid taxes by fraudulently misrepresenting their income, which is what calling a mandatory "fee" is when it is really part of the room rate.
Any financially responsible company minimizes tax liability, just as they make every attempt to minimize all expenses. If some of you feel so strongly, I would suggest taking it up with legislation.
COSPILOT is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2019, 1:45 pm
  #23  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,555
Originally Posted by COSPILOT
Any financially responsible company minimizes tax liability, just as they make every attempt to minimize all expenses. If some of you feel so strongly, I would suggest taking it up with legislation.
Donald, is that you?

Agreed that legislation is desperately needed. People cannot be trusted to behave fairly and ethically, least of all corporations who are increasingly building entire business plans based on deception and fraud.
pinniped is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2019, 1:56 pm
  #24  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo, but live from suitcase
Programs: Delta, AA, Marriott
Posts: 240
Originally Posted by CDTraveler
Saw this on Expedia when I was looking for an NYC hotel:
You'll be asked to pay the following charges at the property:Resort fee: USD 28.69 per room, per night
The resort fee includes:
  • Internet access
  • Phone calls
  • In-room coffee
  • In-room bottled water
None of those are "resort" amenities. Looks to me like yet another a dishonest way to hide the actual room rate.
As a hotel owner, when did they become free?
Gadot is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2019, 1:58 pm
  #25  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo, but live from suitcase
Programs: Delta, AA, Marriott
Posts: 240
Originally Posted by CDTraveler
No, companies should not avoid taxes by fraudulently misrepresenting their income, which is what calling a mandatory "fee" is when it is really part of the room rate.
why is coffee and water and internet part of the room rate. They are extras that we give you over the room rate. Just because in the past we have given them away along with newspapers does not mean that we will be bound to do it in the future. The room rate is the room and cost thereof (cleaning etc). Any extras are extras and you should be glad that they are itemized for you
Gadot is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2019, 2:00 pm
  #26  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,555
Originally Posted by Gadot
As a hotel owner, when did they become free?
Nobody questions the hotel owner's right to try to charge the people who use these things. The market can then dictate whether people are willing to pay for them or not.

Sneaking a bogus fee in on everyone, not part of the room rate, should be 100% illegal.
strickerj likes this.
pinniped is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2019, 2:00 pm
  #27  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo, but live from suitcase
Programs: Delta, AA, Marriott
Posts: 240
Originally Posted by timfountain
Talk about missing the whole point of the thread, which is that these fees are most often completely hidden when making an informed choice between a variety of accommodations in an area you need to find said accommodations. Not quite sure how you "simply look at the total cost" when those exact costs are hiden. Maybe I need to work on my internet x-ray foo more?
as cospilot said, if you look on the hotel's web site, they are not hidden. because your third party agents do is not the hotel's fault
a hotel owner
Gadot is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2019, 2:05 pm
  #28  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,555
Originally Posted by Gadot
as cospilot said, if you look on the hotel's web site, they are not hidden. because your third party agents do is not the hotel's fault
a hotel owner
So it should be real simple to just add the fee to the base room rate, right? I mean, you're saying it's the same difference...

You and I both know the entire purpose of the fee is deception. That's literally why it was invented. Even within the hotel's website: New York Hiltons that charge bogus fees are listed alongside ones that do not. The ones that do not suffer because the bogus-fee hotels look artificially cheap in the first page of search results.
muji and strickerj like this.
pinniped is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2019, 10:36 pm
  #29  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,731
Originally Posted by Gadot
As a hotel owner, when did they become free?
Traditionally the coffee and the bottled water have been put in the room without consultation with the guest to whether they were wanted. I don't want them, so why should I pay a "resort fee" for them? I carry my own phone, why should I have to pay because years ago the hotel put one in the room that I will not need or use? Same with wifi, I can get by just fine without it. So you can argue whether or not they were ever "free" all you like, but when I see BS like bottled water being a "resort" amenity I guarantee you I'm staying at a different hotel because a) I have no respect for a business that uses such bogus descriptions of their charges and b) I don't want to pay fees for items I neither need nor want.

For a genuine amenity, like a gym, if I wanted to use it, I'd be willing to pay a per use fee. I see that as an additional service provided by the hotel, not inherently a part of the "provide me with a room with a bed and bathroom for a price" contract.
muji and strickerj like this.
CDTraveler is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2019, 10:45 pm
  #30  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,731
Originally Posted by Gadot
as cospilot said, if you look on the hotel's web site, they are not hidden. because your third party agents do is not the hotel's fault
a hotel owner
Wrong, incorrect and utter nonsense.

I went to the website of the hotel whose "resort fee" description inspired this thread to see if they disclose the fee, how much it is and what it is for. I got all the to the page to enter payment data without the hotel site disclosing what fees they charge and what the fees cover. At the place where you commit to paying them money, this what is shown as the price:
Total Rate USD 224.10
Excluding Taxes & Fees
THEY DO NOT SHOW YOU WHAT THE FEES OR TAXES ARE.
muji likes this.
CDTraveler is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.