Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Passenger smoked in lav

Passenger smoked in lav

Old Feb 6, 2019, 2:45 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,925
Passenger smoked in lav

Yesterday was a first time experience for me. The two guys sitting across from me on a flight to SFO were downing JD & cokes. After ordering their 6th round of JD, the older (60s ?) of the two goes to the lav. When he returns to his seat, he is reeking of cigarette smoke. He chuckled and leaned over to his buddy and told him what he did. Shortly thereafter, a FA comes to him and told the guy that he smoked in the lav. The guy tried to halfheartedly deny it, but the FA said he was cutting them off from anymore alcohol. The FA left and the smoker started laughing and loudly making jokes about what he had done.

When we landed at SFO, the captain comes on the intercom and says that there is a little bit of traffic in the alley and we’ll have to wait a little before pulling into the gate. After a few minutes, we get to the gate, the captain tells everyone to remain seated. Some guy in a suit comes on the plane and goes directly to the smoker and quietly tells him to follow him off the plane. When I walked off the plane, there were 3 SFPD bicycle officers at the gate and the smoker was standing behind some stanchions, kinda penned off. I guess the last joke was on him. I’m not sure that he’ll be flying home on United.
FLYMSY is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2019, 3:26 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Four Seasons Contributor BadgeHyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 10,013
Too bad they won't charge him the max. $25000 fine as well.
Aventine is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2019, 4:02 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ORD
Programs: United Plat 2MM, Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,727
Originally Posted by Aventine
Too bad they won't charge him the max. $25000 fine as well.
How do you know they won't?
ATLintheair likes this.
Miles Ahead is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2019, 4:06 am
  #4  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,244
Originally Posted by Miles Ahead
How do you know they won't?
Assuming that the fine is actually a civil penalty assessed by the FAA, it is not normal for the maximum to be assessed right off the bat, especially if it is a first time offense.
Brendan likes this.
halls120 is online now  
Old Feb 6, 2019, 5:20 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Programs: UA MM, MB LifeTit
Posts: 1,825
Originally Posted by halls120
Assuming that the fine is actually a civil penalty assessed by the FAA, it is not normal for the maximum to be assessed right off the bat, especially if it is a first time offense.
So how much {is} first offense?

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Feb 6, 2019 at 10:04 am Reason: inappropriate phasing
EricH is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2019, 6:03 am
  #6  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
The original fail was serving anybody six drinks. Smoking in the lav shows what impaired judgment can do for passenger safety. As this was reported to law enforcement, there will be follow up by UA as well. That will likely lead to some action against the FA.

As to the civil penalty, a lot depends. Local cops will turn over the investigation to FAA. FAA will typically propose a penalty which the passenger may accept, pay, and end the mess. Or, the passenger may contest, have a hearing before an ALJ and either win or lose and then pay whatever it is that the ALJ assesses.
Often1 is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2019, 6:14 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PHL
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, Marriott Gold, IHG Platinum, Raddison Platinum, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 5,256
1. Sometimes it must really suck to be an FA/adult baby sitter
2. What happened to the smoke detector? broken? disabled?
3. Who knows what happened to the guy? It could have been a slap on the wrist. Half the time when it escalates to "news worthy", it sounds like they just get a stern talking to and then are free to go on their way.
4. I wouldn't be surprised if he was on UA going home. When I read about passengers who get kicked off of flights, most of the time, the "news" story just says that they get put on a later flight (after they sober up)

I do remember one time seeing the guy next to me using a vaporizer at his seat with the FA standing next to him. It was less popular back then and I remember being confused as to what it was.
Brendan, Miggles, UAL4life and 2 others like this.

Last edited by eng3; Feb 6, 2019 at 6:38 am
eng3 is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2019, 6:35 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Key West
Programs: DL Silver, AA EXP, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 400
I had a friend of a friend who bragged about getting away with smoking the lav. Some planes have a venturi effect sink drain, where when you push the drain stopper open it sort of pops and there is the sound of rushing air. He said he would stick his face in the sink, put a towel over his head holding the drain open and vent it overboard that way. While it sounded like a pretty awful experience, it also sounded plausible.
Brendan and Miggles like this.
cayohueso is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2019, 6:43 am
  #9  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,244
Originally Posted by EricH
So how much {is} first offense?
LOL, in a prior job I handed out civil penalties. I wasn't the recipient.
Brendan likes this.

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Feb 6, 2019 at 10:05 am Reason: quote updated to reflect Moderator edit
halls120 is online now  
Old Feb 6, 2019, 6:47 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montrose, CO
Programs: United 1K MM, Marriott LTPP
Posts: 548
Originally Posted by Often1
The original fail was serving anybody six drinks. Smoking in the lav shows what impaired judgment can do for passenger safety. As this was reported to law enforcement, there will be follow up by UA as well. That will likely lead to some action against the FA.

As to the civil penalty, a lot depends. Local cops will turn over the investigation to FAA. FAA will typically propose a penalty which the passenger may accept, pay, and end the mess. Or, the passenger may contest, have a hearing before an ALJ and either win or lose and then pay whatever it is that the ALJ assesses.
I don't see any indication of how long the flight was or how strong the drinks were or how much he had drunk prior to the flight, so the 6 number alone doesn't tell much. Either way he decided to smoke in the lav, how do we know he wouldn't have if he was sober?

I'm not in favor of a serious drunk being on my flight but I am also not interested in a number being used to determine how many drinks someone gets on a flight. I've certainly drank 6 drinks on a DEN-LHR flight but not on a DEN-MTJ.
AirMiles2001 is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2019, 7:33 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 85
Originally Posted by cayohueso
I had a friend of a friend who bragged about getting away with smoking the lav. Some planes have a venturi effect sink drain, where when you push the drain stopper open it sort of pops and there is the sound of rushing air. He said he would stick his face in the sink, put a towel over his head holding the drain open and vent it overboard that way. While it sounded like a pretty awful experience, it also sounded plausible.
Is there a German word to describe failing to feel even the slightest pang of jealousy? "Let me tell you about the time I had the most undignified and least enjoyable cigarette of my entire life, could have cost me $20k but I got one over the suckers, boom!"
arkellvspressdram is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2019, 7:41 am
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,327
He may has disabled or destroyed the smoke detector in the lavatory. That's a safety hazard. It's also a potential safety hazard for someone to dispose of a lighted/used cigarette in the lavatory trash basket. I'm surprised that the FA didn't take additional steps during the flight, such as wetting or inspecting everything in the lavatory' trash basket and possibly closing the lavatory to passenger use since it might not have had a functioning smoke detector.

Once I was on a flight where someone started to smoke in the lavatory and several FAs came running with fire extinguishers.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2019, 7:45 am
  #13  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,110
Originally Posted by Often1
That will likely lead to some action against the FA.
Since when is doing your job grounds for punitive action?

Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
I'm surprised that the FA didn't take additional steps during the flight
How do you know he/she didn't? Maybe that's why there was a delay in the FA speaking with the passenger.
Franky16, fezzington and Mtothe M like this.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2019, 7:46 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: UA MM
Posts: 4,066
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
He may has disabled or destroyed the smoke detector in the lavatory. That's a safety hazard. It's also a potential safety hazard for someone to dispose of a lighted/used cigarette in the lavatory trash basket. I'm surprised that the FA didn't take additional steps during the flight, such as wetting or inspecting everything in the lavatory' trash basket and possibly closing the lavatory to passenger use since it might not have had a functioning smoke detector.

Once I was on a flight where someone started to smoke in the lavatory and several FAs came running with fire extinguishers.
Disabling a smoke detector is also a Federal offense.
JimInOhio is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2019, 8:07 am
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,651
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
Since when is doing your job grounds for punitive action?
It's unclear they were doing their job in compliance with the law, but I'll leave that for United to investigate (which we'll likely never hear the result of).
mduell is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.