![]() |
Originally Posted by segacs
(Post 29251968)
Me personally? Uzbekistan. It wasn't a big problem, just time-consuming, lots of paperwork, and the approval of the Letter of Invitation by the Ministry of Tourism took ages. Plus, I had to pay expensive courier fees to send my passport and documents to Washington DC, since we Canadians have no local embassy or consulate.
Visas I hear are even worse, depending on your passport, are: Angola, Saudi Arabia (especially if non-business and/or if you're a woman), and Russia if you're applying from outside your home country. I haven't tried to crack any of those as of yet, mind you. Saudi sure, but it's that difficult that agencies are realistically the only way around it Angola...well...goes without saying. |
Originally Posted by mickeyjaw
(Post 29248290)
For all the people saying getting an Indian business visa was a nightmare I can't recommend using a visa assistance service enough. For about £150 (IIRC) they filled out all the paperwork for me to sign, double checked all the supporting documentation then sent somebody else to queue for me. Nice and hassle free. Still only got a 1 year visa despite asking for a longer one though...
On the positive side, they did give me a 5 year visa. That was another thing the visa assistant recommended: ask for the max allowable, and you might get it or get less. It's pretty random. I also used this same firm to do a Peruvian business visa, which required me to gather a lot of paperwork, submit fingerprints and a statement from my village police that I wasn't a criminal. It processed fine, but then I arrived in Lima at midnight and the immigration officer didn't even look at it. :mad: Tourists don't need a visa, so I guess the guy just assumed I was there for Machu Picchu. I did a Chinese tourist visa on my own in Washington DC and it was no problem at all. |
India used to be quite a nightmare -- but the last time I needed a visa in 2017 I just applied online and paid the money and got the visa online within about 4 hours (I think they said expect 24+ but also I've had several visas to India). The online application is a bit onerous but having filled them out before (and yes, filling them out several times online due to crashes or whatever glitches their system always seems to have), it was quite frankly easy. and they gave me 2x entries for a business visa.
Russia was more complicated as expected, with invitation letters, etc. needed for business, but overall just time-consuming. Very much enjoyed my trip there, totally worth it. The most difficult is Thailand if you want a "business" visa to live in Thailand, even after 15 years of owning my own company, every year is a new episode...every 3 months it seems the rules change, have to fly to another country to get an extension, or in most cases flying back to your home country, only getting 3 months that needs to be extended in country, but if you travel it creates timing issues...overall very complicated when trying to manage it vs. a work permit that has different dates and government agencies... Tourist visas are pretty easy. |
Originally Posted by B747-437B
(Post 29252302)
The UK used to have similar questions in their application forms (as of 2013), except they wanted a horrendous level of detail. I had to provide details of 571 trips to 62 countries (including 215 previous trips to the UK with itemised day-to-day itinerary of each) - totally my application had 321 pages of supporting documents. This for a TOURIST visa. I have some friends who are airline crew and they routinely have to turn in 1000+ pages of travel history when applying for US visas.
Have you travelled to the UK in the last 10 years? Please provide details (full address, telephone number and email address of all the places where you stayed during your visit, including hotels) of all your trips to the UK over the last 10 years. Have you travelled outside your country of residence, excluding to the UK, in the last 10 years? You should include travel for study, training, business trips etc. When giving this information please provide details of all your trips abroad that you have not described in answer to question 6.1. More about that story : https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/u-k-...ewal-rant.html Here in the US there's one night I don't even know what town I was in. I had more time than I actually needed for the drive and there were multiple national parks within easy reach. I picked the basic route, figured out approximately the latest I could be at various locations and then figured so long as I didn't bust the timeline simply look at what I wanted to and when I got tired stop at a motel in the next town. What town that was, I don't know. |
Originally Posted by stut
(Post 29252575)
I know there's no way of checking these things (particularly as there was little border control at the time) but I used to live about 1km from the French-German border, and a short distance from the Swiss border. I would regularly cycle across, and quite enjoyed cycling down the river, which would involve regularly criss-crossing from country to country. I also used to regularly use the ever-confusing Basel-Mulhouse EuroAirport, the one with the border fence down the middle. You'd often find the French toilets broken (oh no, no stereotyping there) and have to cross to the Swiss side to spend a centime. Part of me relished the bureacratic possibilities this presented.
. |
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
(Post 29255976)
That's crazy! Thinking back 10 years there have been multiple places I have stayed where I would have no hope of figuring out the name or address.
|
Originally Posted by B747-437B
(Post 29257723)
If I don't know the name or address (and in some countries there is no such thing as an "address" in the western sense of the word), I just put "Hotel - unknown" or "Address - unknown" for that date. They don't actually read the paperwork you provide as a routine course of action! :)
|
The United States. I am from a western country, and never needed a visa to the US for tourism or business. But to study, work or immigrate, it's a different story.
My student and work visas weren't much of an issue, although it certainly has gotten more bureaucratic over the years. But my immigrant visa? Chest x-rays. Blood samples. Fingerprints. Criminal history searches from every jurisdiction I ever lived in. Affidavits. Interviews. Employment and residential histories. More interviews. Military background checks (simply to prove that I had no military background.) Requests for evidence asking for paperwork previously submitted. Interminable waits while you get little to no feedback on what is happening with your petition. Fees that must be paid in specific ways, and online systems that simply don't work. Now, I understand an immigrant visa is a much bigger deal than a 90-day visit. And most of these may not even be unreasonable. But the sum of them, as well as a processing time measured in years, certainly qualifies as the most onerous visa process I've ever been through. Extreme vetting? It's already here. |
Without a doubt, US.
156 pages for a business visa. I especially liked how badly designed the forms were and how, when they changed the forms over time, they simply updated the instructions at the front without removing prior edition instructions - meaning you open the forms up and are presented with 4+ sets of differing instructions on how to complete the form and where to send it. No notation to ignore all instruction sets except whichever one is at the top. Detailing *every* trip for the last 10 years was also entertaining. Getting police reports from each country lived in in the last 15 years was a pain in the bum. USCIS taking 9 months to process it was also rather special. Then, when they finally got to it, they asked for info that had already been supplied. I presume even they couldn't be bothered reading all 156 pages. The compulsory visit to the embassy in another country (no embassy in the one I was in at the time) and the local employee staff yelling at everyone, telling you your visa packet is incomplete and will be denied, only to have the actual State Dept visa officer approve it instantly five minutes later just added to the fun. Not cheap either. US$1250 in the end when all the fees & add on's were totaled. Changing to an immigrant/PermRes visa was/is even worse. Over 600 pages and $4500 so far - still one step left that will take at least 6 months from the time I apply and costs another $950. 18 months from start to landing, and I'm told that's quick-ish. I work with someone from the Phillipines and they said their visa took 8 years to be approved. Brazil was easy. We paid an agent who I'm pretty sure paid bribes to get it all done quickly and had the business visa back within 72 hours. |
Originally Posted by ilcannone
(Post 29230834)
I don't know about processing times, but the gentleman who spoke to my friend (who interpreted for me) was asking questions like 'who is this person?' 'why is he transiting in Angola?' and the like...as if I was some weirdo :P
Russian visas aren't that hard. What people rarely know is that when applying, no one really cares about where you stay, so you can just buy the invitation according to your needs for a few dollars and hey presto! Had to make refundable reservations at all the hotels on Expedia. Pointless exercise of course since I just cancelled them after since after you're in Russia, noone cares where u stay. As for other visas, I remember having to mail in applications for Syria (2005), Myanmar (2008), and I think Vietnam (2008). Iran was also a mail away while they still had an embassy in Canada (2011) India is a pain in the butt in person, really strict on photo size, background, and the agency that processes the applications is only open like 10am-2pm Someone mentioned Uzbekistan, that was easy once I figured out you get one on arrival assuming your country doesn't have a Uzbek embassy. Turkmenistan was not hard but you did require booking a package thru an agency. |
There seem to be two different conversations going on here:
Those who it seems having to do almost anything at all makes them the worst, when seemingly what they have to do is normal and pedestrian, and......... Those who have gotten their fair share of visas and know what "worst" means. So for example at anytime in the last 30 years getting a Brazilian visa as a US citizen is an absolute walk in the park, while those who are dealing with Angola, various 'stans, Russia at various times, know what worst can be. I have been getting Chinese visas since the mid 1980's. other than the 6 months or so before the Olympics it has always been pretty straight forward, and has progressed up to 10 year visas. I have always found Russia to be either ridiculously difficult or extremely fast and easy depending on the political climate at the time, or using the examples of stating everywhere you have been for example, it has ranged from, "just fill out the space on the page" to, "we want every detail of the last 10 years and will match passport stamps to your details" The ones that I have found to be the worst are from secondary countries to strange European outposts or small Caribbean islands. Try being a Turk who wants to visit St. Lucia by land in the years after the UK consulate was bombed in IST, Not easy. How about a Turk with valid long term UK, Schengen and US visas who wants to visit Reunion. Should be simple, but is a huge pain. |
Originally Posted by hfly
(Post 29265734)
Try being a Turk who wants to visit St. Lucia by land
|
Oops, sorry, I meant BY AIR. Meaning that a Turk visiting on a cruise does not need a visa, while one by plane does, but St. Lucia only has a few missions around the World and has a deal with the UK to issue visas in certain places like Turkey. This is something that maybe something like 100 Turks have ever done, as the vast majority who visit St. Lucia do so by sea. So when something happens, like the UK consulate is bombed, no one thinks of this sort of thing, so that when let's say a year after the bombing a Turkish person has planned their trip to St. Lucia, they are told they can get their visa at the consulate in Istanbul (but not Embassy in Ankara), but the UK is NOT issuing them. So the person appeals to the UK home office who at first says that it should then be done in Nicosia - which for whatever reason is the other European place (at the time) that needed a visa to St. Lucia. However of course at the time Turkish passport holders could almost never enter Southern Cyprus, and to do so would mean traveling from IST to ATH and then Cyprus, if one could do so.....oh yeah, and getting a Cypriot visa, because at the time Cyprus was not yet Schengen! Which meant dealing with the St. Lucia High Commission in London, whose response of course was that it had to be done in ones home country at the UK Consulate in ones home city!!
Now the really really really funny thing about all this was that when it was all sorted, the passport agent in St. Lucia did not even look for a visa, just simply opened the passport to a random page and stamped it! |
Originally Posted by hfly
(Post 29266262)
Oops, sorry, I meant BY AIR. Meaning that a Turk visiting on a cruise does not need a visa, while one by plane does, but St. Lucia only has a few missions around the World and has a deal with the UK to issue visas in certain places like Turkey. This is something that maybe something like 100 Turks have ever done, as the vast majority who visit St. Lucia do so by sea. So when something happens, like the UK consulate is bombed, no one thinks of this sort of thing, so that when let's say a year after the bombing a Turkish person has planned their trip to St. Lucia, they are told they can get their visa at the consulate in Istanbul (but not Embassy in Ankara), but the UK is NOT issuing them. So the person appeals to the UK home office who at first says that it should then be done in Nicosia - which for whatever reason is the other European place (at the time) that needed a visa to St. Lucia. However of course at the time Turkish passport holders could almost never enter Southern Cyprus, and to do so would mean traveling from IST to ATH and then Cyprus, if one could do so.....oh yeah, and getting a Cypriot visa, because at the time Cyprus was not yet Schengen! Which meant dealing with the St. Lucia High Commission in London, whose response of course was that it had to be done in ones home country at the UK Consulate in ones home city!!
|
Originally Posted by BuildingMyBento
(Post 29247088)
Me thinks Myanmar's visa application requested those, too.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:26 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.