I prefer connecting flights to nonstop flights
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 765
I prefer connecting flights to nonstop flights
I travel frequently between Las Vegas and Philadelphia. I noticed that I'd prefer a connecting flight to a direct flight, especially when going westbound. I prefer if the connecting city is in the middle of the country like DFW or ORD or DEN
Not just because I get more frequent flier miles and segments. I prefer getting up and walking around, sometimes getting a meal at the connecting airport.
Not just because I get more frequent flier miles and segments. I prefer getting up and walking around, sometimes getting a meal at the connecting airport.
#3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SJC/SFO
Programs: WN A+ CP, UA 1MM/*A Gold, Mar LT Tit, IHG Plat, HH Dia
Posts: 6,284
Having a stop in the middle of a long trip does make the travel more comfortable. The primary tradeoff, of course, is time. (Misconnecting risk is a factor, too, as tjl points out above.) Even an efficient stop adds 90 minutes to the journey. LAS/PHL is only about 4.5 hours nonstop.... For that length flight I'd usually prefer to fly nonstop and enjoy those 90 extra minutes not traveling rather than in the middle of it.
#4
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 49,013
I often did as well. I think what changed my mind was a bad miscalculation. It was somewhere in Asia, I think NRT, and I decided to break up the flight by stopping in LAX. Problem is that to LAX is only two and a half hours or so shorter than JFK, where I live. But in LAX I have a layover plus another 5 hour or so flight remaining to get back to JFK.
Although I’ve done a number of mileage runs, JFK-DFW-LHR. So, it’s different for miles.
Although I’ve done a number of mileage runs, JFK-DFW-LHR. So, it’s different for miles.
#5
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Scotland - ABZ
Programs: Qantas LTG, BA-Blue, KLM -Gold, SAS - Silver
Posts: 2,053
In economy from ICN to Sydney or Perth, lately I've been taking 2x daytime flights on Air Asia and sleeping overnight in the Sama Sama airside KLIA2.
Very relaxing and quite economical.
Very relaxing and quite economical.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,220
For UA status purposes, I often try to add a LAX-SFO or other short connection, rather than a connection which breaks up the middle of a flight - a) it usually adds some overall distance and b) I benefit from the 500 mile minimum. But it is painful to do it.
#7
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Philadelphia
Programs: Rapid Rewards, AAdvantage,
Posts: 120
I travel frequently between Las Vegas and Philadelphia. I noticed that I'd prefer a connecting flight to a direct flight, especially when going westbound. I prefer if the connecting city is in the middle of the country like DFW or ORD or DEN
Not just because I get more frequent flier miles and segments. I prefer getting up and walking around, sometimes getting a meal at the connecting airport.
Not just because I get more frequent flier miles and segments. I prefer getting up and walking around, sometimes getting a meal at the connecting airport.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 30,986
I do it when travelling to India. I like stopping in Dubai for a few hours, rather than a direct flight (on an inferior carrier, which also is a factor). I would never think of doing it on a flight within the US.
#9
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,550
The natural extension of this logic is to just drive from Vegas to Philly. Then you can walk around whenever you like!!
As for me, when I was young I liked creating weird itins to maximize miles and segments. I was never a pure mileage runner (e.g., flying for no purpose other than miles), but if I was flying from North America to Europe for fun, I'd find the most convoluted way I could legally get there for a given fare. Time meant little.
In 2017: time means a lot more, the miles and segments mean a lot less. I tend to sort trips on shortest-duration and look for my airline and routing preferences within that. If there is a nonstop at all, I'm almost certain to take it. I've even opted for a short Spirit (gasp!) nonstop over real airlines with connections.
Funny that CPRich mentions Dubai and India, because that's the one exception I've made this year myself. I chose to spend a night in Dubai over a shorter itin that would have required a domestic flight in India. Flying to HYD, it was nice to have EK business class all the way there, as opposed to AI's crappy J product to DEL and then a 737 from there. One night in a hotel was fine with me.
As for me, when I was young I liked creating weird itins to maximize miles and segments. I was never a pure mileage runner (e.g., flying for no purpose other than miles), but if I was flying from North America to Europe for fun, I'd find the most convoluted way I could legally get there for a given fare. Time meant little.
In 2017: time means a lot more, the miles and segments mean a lot less. I tend to sort trips on shortest-duration and look for my airline and routing preferences within that. If there is a nonstop at all, I'm almost certain to take it. I've even opted for a short Spirit (gasp!) nonstop over real airlines with connections.
Funny that CPRich mentions Dubai and India, because that's the one exception I've made this year myself. I chose to spend a night in Dubai over a shorter itin that would have required a domestic flight in India. Flying to HYD, it was nice to have EK business class all the way there, as opposed to AI's crappy J product to DEL and then a 737 from there. One night in a hotel was fine with me.
#10
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Programs: AS,WN,UA,B6,hotels
Posts: 4,239
Painful in that UA LAX-SFO flights are some of the most notoriously risky for delays?
#11
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: MidSouth
Programs: AA; Delta GM
Posts: 728
If I am traveling on my own, I like connecting flights. It breaks up the trip. If I am flying with Mr. Aquamarine, we take the fewest number of connecting flights possible due to his ear issues on some smaller planes.
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 30,986
And yes, EK vs. AI is exactly the quality trade-off I was also avoiding.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Programs: DL PM, MR Titanium/LTP, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 10,130
I agree with the sentiment for TPAC (just did RDU - ORD - NRT - SYD instead of RDU - DFW - SYD to break it up, well that and the longer way was PE Y).
For domestic or most TATL though I prefer non-stop or minimized connections to get there faster.
For domestic or most TATL though I prefer non-stop or minimized connections to get there faster.
#14
Join Date: May 2013
Location: JFK
Posts: 459
I always prefer the "one take off, one landing" direct flight. I make frequent trips to BNA and never thought to consider a connection for the 2 1/2 hour flight from LGA.
However, as a result of the construction and traffic nightmare that is now LGA I decided to try flying out of a local airport with a connecting flight back in September and have never looked back (HPN to ATL, then ATL to BNA).
I would need to leave at least 3 hours prior to flying out of LGA due to the traffic and my flight out of LGA was delayed for departure nearly every single time.
Contrasting that with HPN where it's a smaller airport, quicker security (even with GE) and even factoring in the time for the connection I'm still taking roughly the same time to make the trip from door to door. Plus less stress and aggravation (at least so far). I've made the trip out of HPN 4 times since September and I think that the ability of flying out of HPN has saved my sanity.
Maybe I've just been lucky so far but last night, I was sitting in terminal B at BNA and hearing the announcement that x Delta flight to LGA was cancelled, all later flights were full and the next available flights were the following day. My flight to ATL went off fine and though my connection to HPN was delayed for an hour it did happen and I did make it home last night.
So I'm with you OP. I still don't like the idea of a connection for a long haul if I can avoid it but who knows?
However, as a result of the construction and traffic nightmare that is now LGA I decided to try flying out of a local airport with a connecting flight back in September and have never looked back (HPN to ATL, then ATL to BNA).
I would need to leave at least 3 hours prior to flying out of LGA due to the traffic and my flight out of LGA was delayed for departure nearly every single time.
Contrasting that with HPN where it's a smaller airport, quicker security (even with GE) and even factoring in the time for the connection I'm still taking roughly the same time to make the trip from door to door. Plus less stress and aggravation (at least so far). I've made the trip out of HPN 4 times since September and I think that the ability of flying out of HPN has saved my sanity.
Maybe I've just been lucky so far but last night, I was sitting in terminal B at BNA and hearing the announcement that x Delta flight to LGA was cancelled, all later flights were full and the next available flights were the following day. My flight to ATL went off fine and though my connection to HPN was delayed for an hour it did happen and I did make it home last night.
So I'm with you OP. I still don't like the idea of a connection for a long haul if I can avoid it but who knows?
#15
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 49,013
When I’ve had time I have broken up JFK-LAX-SYD. The normal connection leaves JFK pretty late to catch the evening departure for SYD. Once I took a morning flight to LAX then checked into an airport hotel for 5 or 6 hours sleep before leaving for SYD.
Another time we intentionally took an extra connection was when we found that AMS-LHR-LUN-CPT-LHR-AMS on BA in business cost as much as the same flight leaving directly from LHR in coach. In order to make sure we didn’t miss the connection in AMS (we were coming from the US) we bolted a few extra days in AMS onto each end of the trip and got to see AMS as well as parts of Africa.
Another time we intentionally took an extra connection was when we found that AMS-LHR-LUN-CPT-LHR-AMS on BA in business cost as much as the same flight leaving directly from LHR in coach. In order to make sure we didn’t miss the connection in AMS (we were coming from the US) we bolted a few extra days in AMS onto each end of the trip and got to see AMS as well as parts of Africa.