How much longer can U.S. carriers justify insane domestic prices?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 157
How much longer can U.S. carriers justify insane domestic prices?
Perhaps a silly question, but we're at a point now where most trans-Atlantic trips from major U.S. cities -- purchased with a bit of foresight -- are under $500 RT. You can even fly from crazy places like Providence to Edinburgh, Scotland one-way for $109 with little advance planning.
At the same time, U.S. carriers still charge insane last-minute fares from say NYC to Atlanta, let alone NYC to LAX or SFO.
I guess my question: given how cheap international travel is (even with the extra fees and taxes added into the equation), how much longer can U.S. carriers justify their insane domestic pricing? At what point will they have to cut prices nearly in half to bring them closer to intra-EU/Schengen flights?
At the same time, U.S. carriers still charge insane last-minute fares from say NYC to Atlanta, let alone NYC to LAX or SFO.
I guess my question: given how cheap international travel is (even with the extra fees and taxes added into the equation), how much longer can U.S. carriers justify their insane domestic pricing? At what point will they have to cut prices nearly in half to bring them closer to intra-EU/Schengen flights?
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MEL CHC
Posts: 20,923
At the same time, U.S. carriers still charge insane last-minute fares from say NYC to Atlanta, let alone NYC to LAX or SFO.
I guess my question: given how cheap international travel is (even with the extra fees and taxes added into the equation), how much longer can U.S. carriers justify their insane domestic pricing? At what point will they have to cut prices nearly in half to bring them closer to intra-EU/Schengen flights?
I guess my question: given how cheap international travel is (even with the extra fees and taxes added into the equation), how much longer can U.S. carriers justify their insane domestic pricing? At what point will they have to cut prices nearly in half to bring them closer to intra-EU/Schengen flights?
This applies to USA domestic, international and EU/Schengen flights.
Comparing USA domestic and EU/Schengen is not valid, given the size-distance. NYC-LAX 2463 miles. LHR-FCO is 899 miles. Most EU flights are a lot less than LHR-FCO.
http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gc?PATH=N...avy&MAP-STYLE=
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: home = LAX
Posts: 25,927
Perhaps a silly question, but we're at a point now where most trans-Atlantic trips from major U.S. cities -- purchased with a bit of foresight -- are under $500 RT. You can even fly from crazy places like Providence to Edinburgh, Scotland one-way for $109 with little advance planning.
At the same time, U.S. carriers still charge insane last-minute fares from say NYC to Atlanta, let alone NYC to LAX or SFO.
I guess my question: given how cheap international travel is (even with the extra fees and taxes added into the equation), how much longer can U.S. carriers justify their insane domestic pricing? At what point will they have to cut prices nearly in half to bring them closer to intra-EU/Schengen flights?
At the same time, U.S. carriers still charge insane last-minute fares from say NYC to Atlanta, let alone NYC to LAX or SFO.
I guess my question: given how cheap international travel is (even with the extra fees and taxes added into the equation), how much longer can U.S. carriers justify their insane domestic pricing? At what point will they have to cut prices nearly in half to bring them closer to intra-EU/Schengen flights?
Also, as someone who lives on the West Coast, I disagree with your assertion that these low fares to Europe are from "most American cities". No, only from cities fairly close to Europe (like your Providence and NYC examples). Meanwhile, you picked about as far-away a domestic city to NYC as you could. Again, apples to oranges.
The first seat sold on the plane almost always costs significantly less than the last seat sold on the plane, no matter what the route. (The exceptions are when the airline thinks the route is going to sell well but for some reason it doesn't. And the other exceptions can be in premium cabins, where there's very few seats comparatively to begin with and it's expected to mostly be bought by business travelers, not leisure travelers like with far-in-advance economy fares.)
Meanwhile, given the size of Europe compared to the size of the US, the equivalent of intra-Europe would be more like intra-Texas, rather than trans-USA. And intra-Texas is how Southwest Airlines got started (and it flew nothing but intra-Texas for many of its early years).
Last edited by sdsearch; Sep 15, 2017 at 6:54 pm
#4
Moderator: Information Desk, Women Travelers, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Programs: AA Gold
Posts: 15,610
This is probably more appropriate in TravelBuzz than Info Desk, so I'll relocate this thread to TB.
chgoeditor
co-moderator, Info Desk
chgoeditor
co-moderator, Info Desk
#5
Moderator: Manufactured Spending
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,576
One thing to note is that intra-Europe flights might be cheaper due to the availability of hgih speed rail, which places downward pressure on airfares. In the US, ground transport options are lacking so the short-haul travel market is less competitive.
#6
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,103
Also, as someone who lives on the West Coast, I disagree with your assertion that these low fares to Europe are from "most American cities". No, only from cities fairly close to Europe (like your Providence and NYC examples). Meanwhile, you picked about as far-away a domestic city to NYC as you could. Again, apples to oranges.
Intra-Europe flights aren't all that cheap, but having more than just 4-6 legacy carriers in the competitive picture make for a different market outcome than in the US. Consider the profit picture of the stock market-listed major airlines and it becomes clearer that the competitive landscape conditions aren't all that comparable for intra-continental travel.
Intra-Europe rail doesn't do much of anything to lower international, intra-Europe airline ticket pricing even on short haul trips. With some market exceptions.
Last edited by GUWonder; Sep 16, 2017 at 12:31 am
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
I guess my question: given how cheap international travel is (even with the extra fees and taxes added into the equation), how much longer can U.S. carriers justify their insane domestic pricing? At what point will they have to cut prices nearly in half to bring them closer to intra-EU/Schengen flights?
This will continue to exist.
#8
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 6,332
I'm curious as to just WHY the OP thinks there is ANY relationship between domestic US fares and Intra-Europe fares, let alone a relationship so close as to mandate similar fares....
Fares are "justified" by ...selling. If domestic US fares sell for more than comparable European ones then that is simply the market at work...
Fares are "justified" by ...selling. If domestic US fares sell for more than comparable European ones then that is simply the market at work...
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,486
There's also Ryanair and other ULCCs helping to push down prices for intra-EU travel. A possibly better comparison here would be between Spirit/Frontier and said European ULCCs.
#10
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: TLV
Programs: UA Platinum, Avis Chairman, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, GA Pilot
Posts: 3,225
Most of the cheapest US-Europe economy class tickets I've seen this year booked for same-week travel and for next quarter travel have been from California to Northern Europe; comparably-timed NY/Boston/Washington to Europe tickets have been more expensive than the West Coast-Europe tickets.
Intra-Europe flights aren't all that cheap, but having more than just 4-6 legacy carriers in the competitive picture make for a different market outcome than in the US. Consider the profit picture of the stock market-listed major airlines and it becomes clearer that the competitive landscape conditions aren't all that comparable for intra-continental travel.
Intra-Europe rail doesn't do much of anything to lower international, intra-Europe airline ticket pricing even on short haul trips. With some market exceptions.
Intra-Europe flights aren't all that cheap, but having more than just 4-6 legacy carriers in the competitive picture make for a different market outcome than in the US. Consider the profit picture of the stock market-listed major airlines and it becomes clearer that the competitive landscape conditions aren't all that comparable for intra-continental travel.
Intra-Europe rail doesn't do much of anything to lower international, intra-Europe airline ticket pricing even on short haul trips. With some market exceptions.
#11
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London / Los Angeles
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond Ambassador, Marriott Platinum, Hyatt Globalist, BA Silver
Posts: 1,630
Comparing USA domestic and EU/Schengen is not valid, given the size-distance. NYC-LAX 2463 miles. LHR-FCO is 899 miles. Most EU flights are a lot less than LHR-FCO.
http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gc?PATH=N...avy&MAP-STYLE=
http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gc?PATH=N...avy&MAP-STYLE=
In Europe a similar distance between two major cities would be often available for $100-$150 R/T on legacy carriers, and as much as half that on low cast carriers.
Ultimately the biggest difference - as others have said - is competition. Low cost carriers like Frontier and Spirit are not ubiquitous in North America like low cost carriers are in Europe. There is a long way to go before the number of routes flown by LCCs can match the number of routes flown by legacy carriers.
Interestingly Mexico seems to be the most competitive North American market for air travel where 2-3 hour flights e.g. MEX-LAS or MEX-CUN are often available for less than $100 R/T. They have lots of low cost carriers with large route networks.
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,103
Distance is a factor but not a big one imo. Domestic US and Canadian flights are just much much more expensive than in Europe even for comparable distances. I say this having moved from Europe to Vancouver, Canada. I don't think I've ever seen flights between Vancouver and Seattle (a mere 127 miles) for less than $230 US round trip, no matter how far in advance you book. Usually it is $300+. Same for most other city pairings although I think the Canadian airfare market is even worse than the US one.
In Europe a similar distance between two major cities would be often available for $100-$150 R/T on legacy carriers, and as much as half that on low cast carriers.
Ultimately the biggest difference - as others have said - is competition. Low cost carriers like Frontier and Spirit are not ubiquitous in North America like low cost carriers are in Europe. There is a long way to go before the number of routes flown by LCCs can match the number of routes flown by legacy carriers.
Interestingly Mexico seems to be the most competitive North American market for air travel where 2-3 hour flights e.g. MEX-LAS or MEX-CUN are often available for less than $100 R/T. They have lots of low cost carriers with large route networks.
In Europe a similar distance between two major cities would be often available for $100-$150 R/T on legacy carriers, and as much as half that on low cast carriers.
Ultimately the biggest difference - as others have said - is competition. Low cost carriers like Frontier and Spirit are not ubiquitous in North America like low cost carriers are in Europe. There is a long way to go before the number of routes flown by LCCs can match the number of routes flown by legacy carriers.
Interestingly Mexico seems to be the most competitive North American market for air travel where 2-3 hour flights e.g. MEX-LAS or MEX-CUN are often available for less than $100 R/T. They have lots of low cost carriers with large route networks.
Within much of Europe there is so much capacity and competition given the legacy carriers, the LCCs/upstarts, tourist charter service providers for intra-Europe trips that pricing power for the carriers isn't as strong as extensively as it is for the legacy majors in the intra-US and intra-Canada market.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 30,959
When buying an intra-EU ticket allows you to fly between points in the US.
#14
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,103
#15
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
The simple answer to OP's question is that carriers don't "justify" anything. Carriers set price based on demand. If the price is too high, aircraft will go out empty and carriers will do some combination of cut fares, cut frequencies & routes, and go bankrupt.
Contrary to OP's assertion which is not based on any reasonable analysis, fares are lower today than in 1985, when adjusted for the cost of living.
OP's fundamental problem is that it is my guess that someone is paying that "insane" price and whether that person is "insane" is irrelevant unless dangerous, in which case he should not be traveling.
As an alternative, if price rather than destination is your sole determinant, why not fly to EDI rather than SFO?
Contrary to OP's assertion which is not based on any reasonable analysis, fares are lower today than in 1985, when adjusted for the cost of living.
OP's fundamental problem is that it is my guess that someone is paying that "insane" price and whether that person is "insane" is irrelevant unless dangerous, in which case he should not be traveling.
As an alternative, if price rather than destination is your sole determinant, why not fly to EDI rather than SFO?