Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Status of law to ban separation of children on US flights?

Status of law to ban separation of children on US flights?

Old Jun 19, 17, 10:25 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 1
Status of law to ban separation of children on US flights?

Greetings.

Last summer, there was wording in the FAA Reauthorization Bill of 2016 that would require the FAA to create rules (in one year) requiring that airlines not separate a child under 13 years old from a guardian on the same flight.

I can find lots of discussion of the original bill, but no status of the actual rules and their rollout. What is the status of this change?

Thank you,

Mark
markalanprior is offline  
Old Jun 19, 17, 1:52 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 26,906
It looks like the language was included in the law - FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 - Section 2309(a).

So it looks like the FAA has about a month to "if appropriate", establish a policy directing air carriers to establish a policy.

So it sounds like it's possible that something might happen to start maybe doing something, possibly. Maybe.
CPRich is offline  
Old Jun 19, 17, 3:20 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 416
It says adjacant seat. That doesn't mean contiguous. It also says that the airline will seat them together wherever "practicable". I can't wait to see mums thinking they "know" their rights and argue they have to sit in the seat next to their child. The FAs could just say it's not practical tbh.
nmh1204 is offline  
Old Jun 19, 17, 4:32 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: AA, UA lowly commoner
Posts: 699
Originally Posted by nmh1204 View Post
I can't wait to see mums thinking they "know" their rights and argue they have to sit in the seat next to their child.
Whereas dads will, of course, be either more reasonable or better informed?
Giggleswick is offline  
Old Jun 19, 17, 7:03 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 26,906
Originally Posted by nmh1204 View Post
It says adjacant seat. That doesn't mean contiguous.
ad·ja·cent əˈjās(ə)nt/ 1.
next to or adjoining something else. "adjacent rooms"
synonyms: adjoining, neighboring, next-door, abutting, contiguous, proximate;
What are you thinking the difference is (other than the correct spelling?). There aren't barriers between airline seats as is the difference in hotel rooms.

It also says "to the maximum extent practicable", not just "whenever 'practicable'"
CPRich is offline  
Old Jun 20, 17, 3:54 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 416
Originally Posted by Giggleswick View Post
Whereas dads will, of course, be either more reasonable or better informed?
No, but most of the posts on here about parents demanding to sit next to their kids are about mums.

Originally Posted by CPRich View Post
What are you thinking the difference is (other than the correct spelling?). There aren't barriers between airline seats as is the difference in hotel rooms.

It also says "to the maximum extent practicable", not just "whenever 'practicable'"
Adjacent doesn't have to mean touching, directly next to. And I didn't say whenever, I said wherever. Yes, the law says maximum extent practicable, but there's not always going to be an option that's practicable, hence I said wherever.
nmh1204 is offline  
Old Jun 20, 17, 8:39 am
  #7  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 48,125
The law, or regulation or whatever, doesn't seem to have any teeth to it.

The "where practicable" bit effectively means the airlines don't have to do anything. I imagine if I ask a GA about this rule before my flight tomorrow, he/she will look at me like I'm crazy. I wonder if they've even heard of it.
pinniped is online now  
Old Jun 20, 17, 12:11 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London, England.
Programs: BA
Posts: 7,824
I'm not sure why the FAA makes such heavy weather about the issue. The CAA in the UK, and I believe in many other countries as well, required this long ago. I understand US carriers departing from the UK have to comply with this.

It's not hard for the seat allocation system to handle it at point of reservation. The family group is often just presented with seats rather than getting choice, but there you go.
WHBM is offline  
Old Jun 21, 17, 9:36 am
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,808
Originally Posted by nmh1204 View Post
It says adjacant seat. That doesn't mean contiguous. It also says that the airline will seat them together wherever "practicable". I can't wait to see mums thinking they "know" their rights and argue they have to sit in the seat next to their child. The FAs could just say it's not practical tbh.
It also states the guardian in the SINGULAR. That means one adult...I cannot wait for the families screaming that mommy and daddy are separated as a violation of the law when in reality the airline only has to keep ONE adult with the spwan.
Proudelitist is offline  
Old Jun 23, 17, 2:38 pm
  #10  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Potomac Falls, VA
Programs: AA Plat 2MM, MR Gold, Avis Pref
Posts: 41,108
Without getting into the merits of the law

No one is guaranteed a specific seat so people can be moved. I'm saying this to mean with in COS that they purchased.

So premium cabin people would be within the premium cabin, Y within Y, E+ within E+ etc
TrojanHorse is offline  
Old Jun 23, 17, 10:52 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: LHR, HKG
Programs: oneworld, gate lice, tsa hater, neoliberal elitist
Posts: 314
I don't understand why the FAA is making a big fuss about this.

Once this is enacted, all its going to do is embolden seat-poaching and seat-swapping families. I've had parents with teenage kids yell at me -- a teenager who usually flies solo -- about how they really, really, really need to sit with their kid, and my aisle seat in particular. It's bloody disgusting how inconsiderate some helicopter parents can be.

It's really unnecessary to force kids 8 or above to sit next their parents.

I posit that the FAA amends this proposed regulation such that at least one parent or designated adult relative be with their spawn in the same cabin. That way we'll stop the parents who fly in F and leave their 6-year-old unattended in Y, without subjecting innocent families to a bureaucratic mess.
leungy18 is offline  
Old Jun 23, 17, 11:28 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,931
Originally Posted by leungy18 View Post
I don't understand why the FAA is making a big fuss about this.
I tend to agree - make the parents responsible for seating arrangements that keep their family together. However, I don't want to be held up in an evacuation as mum or dad are battling against the flow to get to their kids.

Ryanair introduced a rule that if there are kids in a booking, at least one adult must pay the going rate to pre-book a seat and can then select (free) adjacent seats for the kids. That seems reasonable enough to me.
ft101 is offline  
Old Jun 25, 17, 10:38 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: PIT to MSP to PIT; repeat
Programs: Delta, United, AA, Jet Blue .... Whichever is Cheapest
Posts: 1,477
Originally Posted by WHBM View Post
I'm not sure why the FAA makes such heavy weather about the issue.
Most of the "good" seats on US flights are quickly snapped up by Frequent Flyers and those willing to pay extra $$$, thus leaving only scattered seats for families that book late.

The airlines dilemma than becomes, which FF or $$$ customers do they boot into the poor seats so families can sit together?
RRDD is offline  
Old Jun 25, 17, 1:02 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 6,846
Originally Posted by RRDD View Post
The airlines dilemma than becomes, which FF or $$$ customers do they boot into the poor seats so families can sit together?
The airlines block seats for gate assignment so that they can accommodate small children, passengers with disabilities, etc. Those seats look taken on the web site and apps but they are actually available for use in such situations.
LarryJ is online now  
Old Jun 26, 17, 10:36 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Programs: AAdvantage, Skymiles
Posts: 140
This might become a nightmare on some routes (such as into and out of MCO during common school break periods) or during special events (a U8 soccer tournament that takes place in Omaha on a specific week).
mdkowals is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search Engine: