![]() |
Originally Posted by Fleck
(Post 25715780)
You are free to worry about, but it will do you no service.
Originally Posted by Often1
(Post 25715781)
OP can ask any question he wants. He won't get answers to anything other than whether he may be rebooked. That will depend on his fare conditions and his willingness to pay the fees if any.
I have never seen this before, but know it happens frequently. It is nothing to worry about, and nothing we (as a fellow passenger) has a right to inquire about. |
My main surprise is at OP's surprise. As the most mobile society in the world, and with the largest prison population in the world, it should come as no surprise to see prisoners on U.S. flights.
|
Since this is not unique to UA, have moved this thread to TravelBuzz where there are a number of existing threads (such as http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...transport.html) on this topic. Before the move some extraneous posts were removed.
WineCountryUA UA coModerator |
Originally Posted by nachosdelux
(Post 25716375)
Not true
Not true. just about any LEO (state, local. etc) can carry a firearm in DC (or about anywhere in the US) on or off duty (LEOSA HR 218) |
Originally Posted by nachosdelux
(Post 25716375)
... Not true. just about any LEO (state, local. etc) can carry a firearm in DC (or about anywhere in the US) on or off duty (LEOSA HR 218)
Individuals must also obey any federal laws and federal agency policies that restrict the carrying of concealed firearms in certain federal buildings and lands, as well as federal regulations prohibiting the carriage of firearms on airplanes. |
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
(Post 25716970)
But not on aircraft (the actual subject of this thread)
TSA Link: https://www.tsa.gov/travel/law-enforcement |
Maybe it's not a prisoner. Maybe it's just someone really into bondage. Either way, it's not a security risk.
|
And with the armed officer on board it should be one of the safer flights. Sit back, relax, and enjoy.
|
Originally Posted by jfirstenberg
(Post 25715523)
On a recent flight from TPA to IAD (apparently rebooked as a result of TPA-EWR delays), two law enforcement officers (not in uniform) were escorting a prisoner (handcuffed) on our flight.
UA shall have the right to refuse to transport or shall have the right to remove from the aircraft at any point, any Passenger for the following reasons: H) 10) Passengers who are manacled or in the custody of law enforcement personnel |
Originally Posted by Tchiowa
(Post 25718200)
Something is off here. This may happen in the movies but it is not supposed to happen on a plane. United, for example, will not fly handcuffed prisoners.
UA shall have the right to refuse to transport or shall have the right to remove from the aircraft at any point, any Passenger for the following reasons: H) 10) Passengers who are manacled or in the custody of law enforcement personnelA handcuffed passenger would be a significant problem in case of an emergency. I've seen officers with handcuffed prisoners at the head of the boarding line several times and I'm far from the most frequent of flyers. |
Originally Posted by Tchiowa
(Post 25718200)
... United, for example, will not fly handcuffed prisoners...
So, either AA doesn't follow UA's policy, or AA's policy has changed in the past 15 or so years. |
Originally Posted by CDTraveler
(Post 25718491)
... I've seen officers with handcuffed prisoners at the head of the boarding line several times and I'm far from the most frequent of flyers.
|
Originally Posted by CDTraveler
(Post 25718491)
UA has the right to refuse, not they automatically refuse.
I've seen officers with handcuffed prisoners at the head of the boarding line several times and I'm far from the most frequent of flyers. |
These kinds of passengers are pretty routine. Many of them are foreign nationals who committed crimes in the U.S. and are being deported back to their home countries under escort by Federal agents.
There are indeed times such passengers are denied boarding, but it's usually because they resist or act in a way that would potentially disrupt the flight - not simply for the fact that they are cuffed and in custody. In terms of being an actual safety risk to other passengers, it's not clear how that would happen given the supervision they are under. |
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:18 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.