![]() |
I have nothing of value to add to this thread beyond stating that I enjoy flying Y in MD-80s and find them comfortable (in relative terms of course).
Originally Posted by Sheikh Yerbooty
(Post 23071573)
Never let prejudice get in the way of facts!
|
The MD-family is my favorite type of narrow body plane.
In my case, it's mostly attributed to the 3-2 seating, and the wider seats (compared to Boeing products). |
I try to avoid MD-80s due to their inherent design flaw with the jack screw. That being said, increased inspection and maintenance procedures has resulted in no major issues since 2000. For the OP's concern MD-80s are essentially the same size as the 737s. In terms of stability in turbulence, noise, ext, there are no reasons for choosing one over the other.
|
Originally Posted by tireman77
(Post 23073836)
I try to avoid MD-80s due to their inherent design flaw with the jack screw. That being said, increased inspection and maintenance procedures has resulted in no major issues since 2000. For the OP's concern MD-80s are essentially the same size as the 737s. In terms of stability in turbulence, noise, ext, there are no reasons for choosing one over the other.
|
Originally Posted by FirstInFlight
(Post 23067060)
If you are seated at the back the MD can be louder
|
Originally Posted by BearX220
(Post 23074158)
The jack screw failure on AS261 was (A) a result of faulty maintenance procedures and (B) a one-time event. You might as well avoid all 737s because of their never-explained uncontrolled rudder incidents, associated with multiple fatal crashes (UA585, US427, etc.).
The lack of a fail-safe on a primary control system is an inherent design flaw that was determined to be too expensive to fix/redesign. As I also mentioned, new maintenance and inspections have prevented other incidents. As for the 737 rudders, I believe the system was redesigned and all planes in use have been retrofitted since 2008. In addition, Boeing installed a limiter on the rudder in the event of preventing a catastrophic event in the case of ANY rudder incident. THIS is failsafe and that is that is what they are for. |
Deleted, previous poster put in much better.
|
Originally Posted by Wilbur
(Post 23068060)
The further forward you sit, the quieter it will be, as described above. In first it is one of the quietest narrowbodies around in my experience.
Sure, it's quiet on the takeoff roll but once you're above 10,000 ft and 250 KIAS that slipstream noise becomes loud, loud, LOUD. Given a choice between a flight on a 737 and a Mad Dog, I would choose the dog every time. |
Originally Posted by BearX220
(Post 23074158)
The jack screw failure on AS261 was (A) a result of faulty maintenance procedures and (B) a one-time event. You might as well avoid all 737s because of their never-explained uncontrolled rudder incidents, associated with multiple fatal crashes (UA585, US427, etc.).
That was one of the contributing factors in the THY crash short of the runway at AMS/EHAM. Failed RA causes negative AGL indication, thrust levers brought back to idle by the autothrottles, clueless pilots fly on for over a minute not realizing they were at idle and getting progressively lower than the glideslope, airplane lands in field way short of runway. An AA 738 shooting an approach into MIA had an almost identical scenario within +/- a couple weeks of the THY accident at AMS. The good news is that the pilots flying that airplane immediately recognized the uncommanded rollback, disconnected the autopilot, advanced the throttles and hand flew a go around and subsequent completely normal, uneventful landing. |
the last few rows of an md80 are so noisy, i wonder why osha does not shut them down.
|
If flying an AA MD-80, you have a 50% chance of delayed at the gate due to maintenance items "pending sign off"
|
Originally Posted by Badenoch
(Post 23068472)
Yes but I enjoy it. Before the development of quieter engines sitting in the back of a DC9 taking off from a short runway was something I looked forward to. Low-bypass turbofan, full power, rapid climb, tilted back, pressed in the seat, engines roaring. It was great!
|
Originally Posted by user123
(Post 23078970)
If flying an AA MD-80, you have a 50% chance of delayed at the gate due to maintenance items "pending sign off"
I fly on tons of AA MD-80s as well as plenty of other types operated by AA, DL, MQ, OO... I also track all my flights. There is no airline/equipment type in my experience that jumps out as having a disproportionate number of delays. I've had mechanical delays on AA MD-80s... at about the same rate as I have had mechanical delays on other types and other airlines. |
Originally Posted by user123
(Post 23078970)
If flying an AA MD-80, you have a 50% chance of delayed at the gate due to maintenance items "pending sign off"
|
Originally Posted by pinniped
(Post 23068832)
If you sit towards the back of the MD-80, they may run out of Dutch rolls by the time meal service reaches your seat. (Thank you for making me Google Dutch roll, BTW... ;))
In any case, on those rare flights I should think you'd be glad to not have any Dutch rolls. My stomach would vastly prefer a Danish or a Croissant instead. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:31 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.