FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   TravelBuzz (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz-176/)
-   -   Is this an ethical question or non-issue? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz/1572463-ethical-question-non-issue.html)

Loren Pechtel Apr 29, 2014 10:30 am


Originally Posted by ffsim (Post 22777185)
What exactly does OP's situation have to do with double dipping? What am I missing??

Getting reimbursed for the hotel and then getting compensation from the airline.

LondonElite Apr 29, 2014 10:33 am

That's not double dipping. EU261 has nothing to do with her hotel expenses.

mikeef Apr 29, 2014 11:01 am


Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel (Post 22780017)
Getting reimbursed for the hotel and then getting compensation from the airline.

Do you mean getting reimbursed for the hotel and having the OP's company pay for the hotel? In that case, it would be double dipping and the OP would be right not to charge the hotel to the company.

If, however, the OP lets the airline pick up the tab for the hotel as well as EU 261, while charging nothing to their company, then I don't see the problem.

Mike

ffsim Apr 29, 2014 11:22 am


Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel (Post 22780017)
Getting reimbursed for the hotel and then getting compensation from the airline.

As the posters above mention, it's very clear from OP's statements that there was no hotel reimbursement involved. The hotel was covered by the airline.

greathustle Apr 29, 2014 2:03 pm

Sorry if I wasn't clear. I was quoting you and the other poster to agree.


Originally Posted by angatol (Post 22777845)
"Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers"

I don't see anywhere where it seeks to compensate "passenger's employers" or the "person who bought the ticket for the passenger". Perhaps you can read it and tell us?


angatol Apr 29, 2014 2:31 pm

.....

Loren Pechtel Apr 29, 2014 8:51 pm


Originally Posted by ffsim (Post 22780288)
As the posters above mention, it's very clear from OP's statements that there was no hotel reimbursement involved. The hotel was covered by the airline.

Ok, I misunderstood. I thought it was covered by his employer.

I'll change my opinion--he doesn't owe anyone anything.

5khours Apr 30, 2014 12:55 am

I'd report it to your boss by email and ask how to handle it.

If they ask for it back (which I don't think they will), you can refuse. But.... you could get in trouble if you don't report it.

greathustle Apr 30, 2014 1:15 am

No, you can't.


Originally Posted by 5khours (Post 22784014)
But.... you could get in trouble if you don't report it.


LondonElite Apr 30, 2014 3:43 am


Originally Posted by 5khours (Post 22784014)
I'd report it to your boss by email and ask how to handle it.

Why? It's none of the boss's business anymore than what she had for breakfast that morning.


If they ask for it back (which I don't think they will), you can refuse. But.... you could get in trouble if you don't report it.
Ask for what back? The EU261 money? It's not theirs to begin with. You can't 'get in trouble' for it! Do you even understand what EU261/2004 is about?

cfo314 Apr 30, 2014 1:53 pm

Flight was supposed to get me home on Friday but I arrived on Saturday instead - more of an inconvenience to me rather than my business. I don't recall expensing anything extra because of the extra day of travel.

Thanks all for the input.

HMPS Apr 30, 2014 6:35 pm


Originally Posted by cfo314 (Post 22787464)
Flight was supposed to get me home on Friday but I arrived on Saturday instead - more of an inconvenience to me rather than my business. I don't recall expensing anything extra because of the extra day of travel.

Thanks all for the input.

Apersonal check with a short memo to the boss. If he elects to return it all to you, great. If not, for a small sacrifice you will be a hero.
The reason I propose the above is just in case your boss and his bosses do pocket such things but don't want to make it a " policy"
Decades ago I used to work for a Fortunr top five company. I don' eat or drink much so even though I spent $8-9 on dinner, I would claim $12' withtrepedition !
Got a call from the boss, though I was in trouble.....he said to claim around $ 15-17 for dinner as otherwise I was " pulling down everyone's average ". !

Go figure.

ffsim Apr 30, 2014 6:49 pm


Originally Posted by HMPS (Post 22788969)
Apersonal check with a short memo to the boss. If he elects to return it all to you, great. If not, for a small sacrifice you will be a hero.
The reason I propose the above is just in case your boss and his bosses do pocket such things but don't want to make it a " policy"

Are you serious? After nearly 60 posts we're still talking about cutting cheques to our employer? This isn't the employer's money. As OP says in the post to which you replied, OP doesn't "recall expensing anything extra because of the extra day of travel."

LondonElite May 1, 2014 3:12 am


Originally Posted by HMPS (Post 22788969)
Apersonal check with a short memo to the boss. If he elects to return it all to you, great. If not, for a small sacrifice you will be a hero.

It's not the company's money (or the boss's) to start with. EU261 compensation is based on the notion of inconvenience to the passenger. The company is not out of pocket, nor was it inconvenienced. The money squarely belongs to the employee and the employee has absolutely no duty whatsoever to report anything to anybody.

Badenoch May 1, 2014 6:34 am


Originally Posted by HMPS (Post 22788969)
Apersonal check with a short memo to the boss. If he elects to return it all to you, great. If not, for a small sacrifice you will be a hero.

It would make you an idiot at most of the places I've worked and someone to henceforth be regarded with suspicion.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:33 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.