Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Passenger rights when missed airline flight was due to immigration processing.

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Passenger rights when missed airline flight was due to immigration processing.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2017, 3:31 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Programs: AA Plat, UA 1K>Plat>moving to Silver
Posts: 2,089
I'd sure hate to have to go through IAD without GE. And I've stood in some pretty long lines at CDG Terminal 1.
Artpen100 is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2017, 6:24 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Nashua, NH USA
Programs: Seashore Trolley Museum "flight attendant"
Posts: 1,991
Just my 2 cents worth.

The airline should honor the existing ticket for travel on the next available flight after the unexpectedly long time needed to clear customs.

A transportation provider knows that each and every customer who travels that particular route is going to clear customs at that particular station. And the provider knows that delays do happen during the clearing of customs.

With that in mind I believe that the provider is responsible for using its best efforts to complete the customer's itinerary for the agreed upon price at time of purchase despite foreseeable irregularities beyond its control during the itinerary although the net effect of irregularities that cause delay will result in a delay in completing the itinerary.

I would not expect the provider to provide amenties for the comfort of the customer during irregularities.

The provider is free to price the itinerary taking into account the possibility of delays and the resultant need to reschedule a customer together with having reserve system capacity to handle the results of these delays.

Last edited by AllanJ; Oct 20, 2017 at 6:30 pm
AllanJ is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2017, 9:00 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,307
Originally Posted by AllanJ
With that in mind I believe that the provider is responsible for using its best efforts to complete the customer's itinerary for the agreed upon price at time of purchase despite foreseeable irregularities beyond its control during the itinerary although the net effect of irregularities that cause delay will result in a delay in completing the itinerary.
Longest sentence of the week without a comma?

"Airline pays" would have done.
ft101 is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2017, 3:46 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Houston
Programs: UA 1K and Million Miler, *A Gold, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hertz Five Star,
Posts: 1,301
Originally Posted by jmastron
Well, I can agree that AA may not be responsible for hotel etc costs in this situation, I vehemently disagree that they "they did not have to even provide you with the free flight the next day". This was a single ticket on AA. AA determines the minimum connecting time, AA coordinates its flight schedules with CBP to some degree for staffing purposes, AA is responsible for the connection (if not the exact flight time). They absolutely are responsible for rebooking the passenger "for free" just as they would if there were weather or other delays that aren't considered their fault.
A 4 hour tansit is more than enough and perfectly legal. Thus AA is NOT responsible for missed connections due to CBP issues.
Collierkr is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2017, 7:46 pm
  #35  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Earth. Residency:HKG formerly:YYZ
Programs: CX, DL, Nexus/GE, APEC
Posts: 10,687
How can an airline be held responsible for one's special immigration issues?
tentseller is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2017, 10:51 am
  #36  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,404
Originally Posted by Collierkr
A 4 hour tansit is more than enough and perfectly legal. Thus AA is NOT responsible for missed connections due to CBP issues.
Similarly AA isn't responsible for weather or especially ATC issues (which are caused by a government agency much like immigration issues), yet we would expect the airline to rebook the customer rather than just cancelling the ticket and saying that it's not the airline's fault/problem.

Of course, it would be different if the immigration problems were the fault of the passenger in some sense or even if the ticket were deliberately booked with a very risky connection time when other more reasonable choices were available on the same day (even at a higher price).

Last edited by MSPeconomist; Oct 22, 2017 at 11:19 am Reason: Typo
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2017, 1:11 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Scarborough
Posts: 596
I'm totally with the OP on this one.
Immigration is a big "formality" when traveling international. At other airports they often give priority to passengers whose flight is leaving soon when there are lineups, they try to speed it up in whatever way they can.

Not the BS crap about glorifying themselves (CBP, CBSA etc) and treating people like ..... There is something seriously wrong with making a person wait 3 hrs, and then just handing them back their passport and then not even helping out a little when the passenger asks. ... did they do in 3 hrs? They purposely delay, work as slow as possible and don't give a damn about anyone else cuz they're already on the job and wanna do as little work as possible in secondary. It's like nobody cares.
How about you help that pax to clear security quickly so they can get thru faster when they already had a crappy 3 hr wait ??

What if someone is from a poor country and can't afford booking hotels at their costs? There are many many such travelers who can't afford and who don't have super hispeed at their fingertips at every airport while traveling.
Are you guys going to tell them at their faces that oh too bad tough luck go deal with it?. Such arrogance?

You do that to someone today, pretty sure its gonna come hit you someday when you're down and can't rebook your marriots and hiltons.

If CBP can't deal with it, then either hire more people and make process quicker and smoother, or put a notice for ALL travelers that hey, we can't process people efficiently, so don't bother coming. Stay away aand go somewhere else!
cdn1 is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2017, 2:23 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CT USA
Posts: 2,577
https://www.sleepinginairports.net/
JumboJet is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2017, 4:00 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Houston
Programs: UA 1K and Million Miler, *A Gold, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hertz Five Star,
Posts: 1,301
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
Similarly AA isn't responsible for weather or especially ATC issues (which are caused by a government agency much like immigration issues), yet we would expect the airline to rebook the customer rather than just cancelling the ticket and saying that it's not the airline's fault/problem.

Of course, it would be different if the immigration problems were the fault of the passenger in some sense or even if the ticket were deliberately booked with a very risky connection time when other more reasonable choices were available on the same day (even at a higher price).
In your example the affected flights are assumably still flying, albeit late, and so they either keep people on the later flight or move them per the rules of their ticket.

In the CBP example, the passenger flat out missed their scheduled flight, and so AA would have to accomodate them using another potential revenue seat, which they can do, but are not REQUIRED. Now, most airlines, AA included WILL accomodate as a gesture of good will and customer centric service.
Proudelitist likes this.

Last edited by Collierkr; Oct 22, 2017 at 4:01 pm Reason: typo
Collierkr is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2017, 8:12 pm
  #40  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,404
Originally Posted by Collierkr
In your example the affected flights are assumably still flying, albeit late, and so they either keep people on the later flight or move them per the rules of their ticket.

In the CBP example, the passenger flat out missed their scheduled flight, and so AA would have to accomodate them using another potential revenue seat, which they can do, but are not REQUIRED. Now, most airlines, AA included WILL accomodate as a gesture of good will and customer centric service.
I'm not thinking about a case where there's a delay posted to a flight due to ATC and passengers try to move to an earlier flight but rather the case of an ATC delay causing a late arrival and therefore the passenger missing the next connecting flight. Just like the CBP delay, the passenger has "flat out" missed their scheduled (next connecting) flight and the airline needs to give the person another "potential revenue seat."
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2017, 8:35 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: AA, DL, Avis, Enterprise, National, IHG, HH, SPG/MR
Posts: 1,852
Originally Posted by JumboJet
There's an actual website supporting this? An airport is not a hotel. Don't act like a hobo or be a cheapskate, get a hotel room.
Statman likes this.
kb9522 is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2017, 12:40 pm
  #42  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,570
Originally Posted by kb9522
There's an actual website supporting this? An airport is not a hotel. Don't act like a hobo or be a cheapskate, get a hotel room.
I won't judge...I fly enough through ORD every winter that I'm afraid it would be bad karma. I don't know how bad a blizzard has to get to shut down the CTA and the shuttles to nearby hotels, but at least once a year we all see the images of hundreds of cots in the terminal.
pinniped is online now  
Old Oct 24, 2017, 12:54 pm
  #43  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,273
Originally Posted by kb9522
There's an actual website supporting this? An airport is not a hotel. Don't act like a hobo or be a cheapskate, get a hotel room.
There are plenty of times it does not make sense to find a hotel room. For instance, when you would only have an hour or two to sleep by the time you made it to the hotel, and have to catch the shuttle back. In bad weather when hotels are sold out. Etc...
javabytes is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2017, 1:00 pm
  #44  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,273
Airlines set their MCTs taking into consideration what a customer must do to get from one flight or the other. They do this knowing passengers passing through customs may take longer, thus I-D is longer than D-D. If the actual time taken to get from one flight to the other is longer than expected, the airline takes on the responsibility of rebooking the passenger, provided the passenger's connection time exceeds MCT. I would obviously have no sympathy for someone who missed their connection because they went drinking in an airport bar for a few hours, but for a longer than expected trip through customs, the airline should absolutely rebook. I agree the airline is not on the hook for hotel accommodations though, as this was not within their control.
javabytes is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2017, 9:54 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: AA, DL, Avis, Enterprise, National, IHG, HH, SPG/MR
Posts: 1,852
Originally Posted by javabytes
There are plenty of times it does not make sense to find a hotel room. For instance, when you would only have an hour or two to sleep by the time you made it to the hotel, and have to catch the shuttle back. In bad weather when hotels are sold out. Etc...
There is never an excuse to act like you're a hobo. Unless you actually are.

Want to sleep? Get a room. Otherwise, man up and stay awake.

The lounge is not your personal bedroom. Neither are the four seats you take up at the terminal.
kb9522 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.