Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Old Timer's Airline Quiz and Discussion.

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Old Timer's Airline Quiz and Discussion.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 2, 2017, 12:53 am
  #11116  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London, England.
Programs: BA
Posts: 8,476
Originally Posted by teddybear99
Sorry, I am not as much as an old timer as others, but did Pan Am even had a choice at this point? I mean wasn't the route regulated by the Government and the airline actually bid on the route when it was first conceived through regulation?
It was a combination of these points. Pan Am and TWA were both given authorisation for various routes from the US to Europe, building up way back in the 707 days. By the early 1970s the 747 came along and was applied to many of these, and there was a travel downturn. Therefore the two airlines proposed a form of route swap, where each, equally, gave up half of their poor performing routes. This all needed agreement by the government authority, which was (maybe surprisingly) given. Bear in mind that there were still the European airlines for competition on each route.

At London, Pan Am gave up Chicago, and TWA gave up San Francisco. Pan Am mostly withdrew from Paris, and TWA from Frankfurt. Pan Am gave up Spain and Portugal, and TWA their round-the-world flights through Asia. There were various adjustments afterwards but that set the general trend for years afterwards. By the nature of the agreement they were only temporarily suspended so could not be given to another carrier.

"Deregulation" as such, and the ability for an airline to decide for themselves where to fly, only came in 1978 to US domestic flights, international flights were subject to various agreements with other governments, which have varied and been reduced, but not entirely eliminated, in subsequent years.
WHBM is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2017, 7:34 am
  #11117  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS, DL, UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 10,795
Originally Posted by WHBM
It was a combination of these points. Pan Am and TWA were both given authorisation for various routes from the US to Europe, building up way back in the 707 days. By the early 1970s the 747 came along and was applied to many of these, and there was a travel downturn. Therefore the two airlines proposed a form of route swap, where each, equally, gave up half of their poor performing routes. This all needed agreement by the government authority, which was (maybe surprisingly) given. Bear in mind that there were still the European airlines for competition on each route.

At London, Pan Am gave up Chicago, and TWA gave up San Francisco. Pan Am mostly withdrew from Paris, and TWA from Frankfurt. Pan Am gave up Spain and Portugal, and TWA their round-the-world flights through Asia. There were various adjustments afterwards but that set the general trend for years afterwards. By the nature of the agreement they were only temporarily suspended so could not be given to another carrier.

"Deregulation" as such, and the ability for an airline to decide for themselves where to fly, only came in 1978 to US domestic flights, international flights were subject to various agreements with other governments, which have varied and been reduced, but not entirely eliminated, in subsequent years.
It always appeared to me that Pan American World Airways enjoyed a rather cozy relationship with the U.S. government back in the days when it was a global force with its far flung international route network. Indeed, some have called the airline America's "Chosen Instrument" and Juan Trippe, who ran Pan Am, wrote a book concerning the airline with this title. Of course, along came deregulation here in the U.S. and while that development strictly concerned domestic service as WHBM points out, I think it had a profound affect on Pan Am and ultimately contributed to its downfall.
jlemon is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2017, 7:36 am
  #11118  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS, DL, UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 10,795
Originally Posted by jlemon
And on a Friday morning as we roll into a big holiday weekend here in the U.S., here are eight quiz items concerning Pacific Southwest Airlines (PSA) and the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar.....

1. How many new L-1011 aircraft manufactured by Lockheed at their plant in Palmdale, CA were painted in PSA's full company colors? ANSWERED

2. Lockheed added a fairing underneath of the forward fuselage of the PSA TriStars. Why did they do this? ANSWERED

3. How many seats did PSA's L-1011s have on the main deck of the aircraft?

4. What was unique about the PSA TriStar aircraft in terms of the location of 16 passenger seats? ANSWERED

5. Why did PSA send an L-1011 with a full complement of twelve lady flight attendants to Hong Kong (HKG) in 1974? ANSWERED

6. On what date was PSA's first TriStar placed into revenue service on an intrastate flight in California and where did it depart from on this first flight? ANSWERED

7. What was PSA's initial turnaround time between flights with the L-1011 and what was this turn time subsequently changed to?

8. After PSA removed their TriStar aircraft from service, another airline proposed to use these stored aircraft on a premium shuttle service operated on weekdays between Chicago O'Hare (ORD) and New York LaGuardia (LGA) and then attempt to operate charter services with them on the weekends. However, this plan never came to fruition. Identify the air carrier that proposed this plan.
Just in case anyone is interested......

Last edited by jlemon; Jul 3, 2017 at 8:05 am Reason: answer updates
jlemon is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2017, 8:46 am
  #11119  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London, England.
Programs: BA
Posts: 8,476
Quick ... I'm just off to London Euston station for a train to Birmingham, for an all day session tomorrow and then continuing by train to Scotland. Yes, it is a pleasant sunny Sunday mid-afternoon ... Just time for the PSA questions.

For I was in California in September 1974 and went with PSA one Sunday morning LAX-SFO. How cheap that was. It was a 727, but there was plenty of material around about the L1011.

I'm guessing the L1011 started service first Monday in September. And its departure point was likely PSA's base, San Diego.

By the time the aircraft came it was apparent it was far too large for the route. So I'm guessing the trip to Hong Kong was to try and sell/lease them to Cathay Pacific.

Birmingham beckons ... Hey, nobody has had a shot yet at my Ford Tri-Motor question
WHBM is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2017, 9:12 am
  #11120  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: South Florida
Programs: DL Skymiles KE Skypass
Posts: 2,363
Originally Posted by jlemon
And on a Friday morning as we roll into a big holiday weekend here in the U.S., here are eight quiz items concerning Pacific Southwest Airlines (PSA) and the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar.....

1. How many new L-1011 aircraft manufactured by Lockheed at their plant in Palmdale, CA were painted in PSA's full company colors?

2. Lockheed added a fairing underneath of the forward fuselage of the PSA TriStars. Why did they do this?

4. What was unique about the PSA TriStar aircraft in terms of the location of 16 passenger seats?
1. They only had 2 in their fleet, so I will guess both were originally painted before delivery to the airline as they received them new.

2 and 4 may be related in that the forward cargo hold was modified with a stairwell to allow boarding from airports that did not have jetways. As such, there were 16 seats on this level with an additional stairway to the main level inside the compartment. The fairing was there to add additional protection for those passengers and covered the stairwell when retracted while flying.
teddybear99 is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2017, 12:14 pm
  #11121  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS, DL, UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 10,795
Originally Posted by WHBM
Quick ... I'm just off to London Euston station for a train to Birmingham, for an all day session tomorrow and then continuing by train to Scotland. Yes, it is a pleasant sunny Sunday mid-afternoon ... Just time for the PSA questions.

For I was in California in September 1974 and went with PSA one Sunday morning LAX-SFO. How cheap that was. It was a 727, but there was plenty of material around about the L1011.

I'm guessing the L1011 started service first Monday in September. And its departure point was likely PSA's base, San Diego.

By the time the aircraft came it was apparent it was far too large for the route. So I'm guessing the trip to Hong Kong was to try and sell/lease them to Cathay Pacific.

Birmingham beckons ... Hey, nobody has had a shot yet at my Ford Tri-Motor question
5. The TrisStar in question was the second L-1011 to be delivered to Pacific Southwest. Before it was placed into intrastate revenue service by PSA, the aircraft was chartered by Lockheed for an around the world, 46,000 mile sales tour which included a stop at the Farnborough Air Show. Twenty-one PSA employees went along for the ride with the Lockheed sales executives. The PSA L-1011 was indeed shown to Cathay Pacific during a sales stop in Hong Kong. The twelve PSA lady flight attendants in their uniform dresses featuring short skirts may have assisted Lockheed in selling the TriStar as CX then subsequently ordered new aircraft. Fourteen days after the global sales tour concluded, PSA began scheduled service in California with this airplane.

6. The first revenue flight conducted by PSA indeed departed from the airline's main base in San Diego on a routing of SAN-LAX-SFO. PSA employees gave their first TriStar a nickname: "Mother Grinning Bird".

However, this flight did not take place in September.....but you are very close with your guess concerning this first date of scheduled revenue operations.

Last edited by jlemon; Jul 2, 2017 at 12:54 pm Reason: Mother Grinning Bird
jlemon is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2017, 12:48 pm
  #11122  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS, DL, UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 10,795
Originally Posted by teddybear99
1. They only had 2 in their fleet, so I will guess both were originally painted before delivery to the airline as they received them new.

2 and 4 may be related in that the forward cargo hold was modified with a stairwell to allow boarding from airports that did not have jetways. As such, there were 16 seats on this level with an additional stairway to the main level inside the compartment. The fairing was there to add additional protection for those passengers and covered the stairwell when retracted while flying.
1. You are correct with your statement that PSA only flew two L-1011 aircraft in scheduled service. However, more than two newly manufactured TriStars were painted in PSA's full company livery. Please guess again!

2. & 4. These are indeed related and PSA's aircraft did have a lower deck lounge with 16 passenger seats. The fairing underneath the forward fuselage was added for the protection of lower deck lounge passengers in the event of a belly landing.
jlemon is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2017, 1:29 pm
  #11123  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS, DL, UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 10,795
Originally Posted by WHBM
Just looked it up. The substantial layover time at each end is surprising, as is the lack of connectivity to any other 727 schedule; it needs two aircraft on something which could be achieved by one in a daily round trip. Turning now to the TT in question, I see it also operated a Panama-Caracas tag flight, overnighting in Caracas, to the PA 747 which ran daily LAX-Guatemala-Panama.
WHBM's comments above concerning Pan Am got me thinking about another airline's connecting service where the first leg was a domestic route in the U.S.; however, this air carrier was not permitted to carry local passenger traffic on this sector but operated a daily flight anyway in order to connect traffic to their international service. The year was 1950 and the domestic flight in question departed from Houston Hobby Airport. Upon arrival at another U.S. domestic airport, passengers then connected to a flight operated by the same airline that served three different international destinations. The flight from Houston departed daily at 5:30 pm and the connecting international flight arrived at its final international destination the next morning at 7:00 am.

So with all this in mind, please answer the following:

A. Name the airline that operated both of these flights.

B. Identify the propeller aircraft type operated on the initial flight from Houston.

C. Name the U.S. domestic airport where the connection was made to the international flight.

D. Identify the three international destinations served by the connecting flight.

E. Name the different and larger propeller aircraft type used to operate the international flight.

And for bonus points....

F. Provide the marketing name the airline used for this international service.

Last edited by jlemon; Jul 2, 2017 at 1:36 pm
jlemon is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2017, 6:20 pm
  #11124  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: South Florida
Programs: DL Skymiles KE Skypass
Posts: 2,363
Originally Posted by jlemon
1. You are correct with your statement that PSA only flew two L-1011 aircraft in scheduled service. However, more than two newly manufactured TriStars were painted in PSA's full company livery. Please guess again!
I didn't think the three additional sold to LTU in 1977 were painted in PSA's colors, so I guess that means a total of 5.
teddybear99 is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2017, 8:33 pm
  #11125  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,187
Originally Posted by jlemon
6.On what date was PSA's first TriStar placed into revenue service on an intrastate flight in California and where did it depart from on this first flight? Partially answered....still looking for the first date of scheduled passenger operation
6. August 1, 1974 - The same day that the UN created the Green Line in Cyprus.
Indelaware is offline  
Old Jul 3, 2017, 7:59 am
  #11126  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS, DL, UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 10,795
Originally Posted by teddybear99
I didn't think the three additional sold to LTU in 1977 were painted in PSA's colors, so I guess that means a total of 5.
1. Yep. And LTU initially operated these three TriStars that had originally been intended for PSA with the lower deck lounges. Registrations were D-AERI, D-AERE and D-AERU. I believe D-AERI may have been destroyed by fire on the ground at Dusseldorf during maintenance in 1991.
jlemon is offline  
Old Jul 3, 2017, 8:04 am
  #11127  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS, DL, UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 10,795
Originally Posted by Indelaware
6. August 1, 1974 - The same day that the UN created the Green Line in Cyprus.
6. Quite right. PSA's first L-1011 replaced a B727-200 primarily on the LAX-SFO route with the aircraft beginning and ending its day at SAN. Initial load factors were around 50% and the aircraft achieved a dispatch record of better than 98%.
jlemon is offline  
Old Jul 3, 2017, 8:08 am
  #11128  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS, DL, UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 10,795
Originally Posted by jlemon
....here are several quiz items concerning Pacific Southwest Airlines (PSA) and the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar.....

3. How many seats did PSA's L-1011s have on the main deck of the aircraft?

7. What was PSA's initial turnaround time between flights with the L-1011 and what was this turn time subsequently changed to?

8. After PSA removed their TriStar aircraft from service, another airline proposed to use these stored aircraft on a premium shuttle service operated on weekdays between Chicago O'Hare (ORD) and New York LaGuardia (LGA) and then attempt to operate charter services with them on the weekends. However, this plan never came to fruition. Identify the air carrier that proposed this plan.
And we are moving right along here with just three left to go.....
jlemon is offline  
Old Jul 3, 2017, 10:38 am
  #11129  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,371
Originally Posted by jlemon
... quiz items concerning Pacific Southwest Airlines (PSA) and the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar.....
3. How many seats did PSA's L-1011s have on the main deck of the aircraft?
3. my first flight on a TriStar was aboard "Mama Grinning Bird" N10112 (SFO-LAX) in Jan 1975, but not having the foresight to realize that there would be a quiz item I certainly didn't count seats!

having discovered that no operators actually configured to the maximum certified number of seats (315), I'll just pull an order-of-magnitude number out of thin air: how about 287?
jrl767 is online now  
Old Jul 3, 2017, 12:45 pm
  #11130  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS, DL, UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 10,795
Originally Posted by jrl767
3. my first flight on a TriStar was aboard "Mama Grinning Bird" N10112 (SFO-LAX) in Jan 1975, but not having the foresight to realize that there would be a quiz item I certainly didn't count seats!

having discovered that no operators actually configured to the maximum certified number of seats (315), I'll just pull an order-of-magnitude number out of thin air: how about 287?
3. You are very, very close! It was a bit less than 287. Care to guess again?
jlemon is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.