Old Timer's Airline Quiz and Discussion.
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: PDX
Programs: AS DL
Posts: 9,038
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: PDX
Programs: AS DL
Posts: 9,038
Air France is a reasonably correct answer. It was actually Air France, operated by _____.
LYS, not correct.
F28. Correct! So 1.5 or 2 of 3 correct. I see a chicken dinner being prepared.
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: PDX
Programs: AS DL
Posts: 9,038
That is one of the biggest airline mistakes that I have made. I had the chance to fly aboard a Dassault Mercure but didn't. I only saw one. Opportunity lost. Now the best thing possible is to see one is a museum. The second biggest airline mistake was not to have flown in a Concorde. A bit expensive but it could have been done. A potential third airline mistake was not to have sought out a Trident route, which may have been possible, maybe not. On my first European trip, the plan was flying into London then flying somewhere on the continent. Surely, it would have been possible to fly on a Trident. Instead, I picked a Lufthansa 737-200 flight. Not even a 737-100, which would have been a first and only time on a 737-100 as I didn't fly any PeoplExpress 737-100's (ex-Lufthansa).
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS, DL, UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 10,795
Well, of course, I agonized about the number of miles ("Good Lord, 100,000 miles! Argggh!") and ended up spending about half the CO OnePass miles for a round trip BusinessFirst ticket on board a Continental DC-10-30 between IAH and CDG. In retrospect, I really should have seized the opportunity to fly on board the Concorde.....
And speaking about the Concorde, here's a BONUS quiz question.....
What airline was reportedly in the planning stages during the late 1970's for possible scheduled Concorde flights between two cities in the U.S., being Atlanta and Houston, and a city in Europe with this service planned to possibly begin around 1980? The airline in question never operated the Concorde but was reportedly said to be in the midst of making arrangements to add two of the SST aircraft to its fleet (which subsequently never happened). And as part of your answer, also identify the European city that would have been served by the routes to and from ATL and IAH. ANSWERED - British Caledonian
Last edited by jlemon; Jul 26, 2020 at 9:54 am Reason: answer update
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,371
looking at a map it seems the only plausible intermediate stop in France would be Strasbourg/SXB
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,371
What airline was reportedly in the planning stages during the late 1970's for possible scheduled Concorde flights between two cities in the U.S., being Atlanta and Houston, and a city in Europe with this service planned to possibly begin around 1980? The airline in question never operated the Concorde but was reportedly said to be in the midst of making arrangements to add two of the SST aircraft to its fleet (which subsequently never happened). And as part of your answer, also identify the European city that would have been served by the routes to and from ATL and IAH.
FAA restrictions on supersonic flight over land would have meant the former was more likely, akin to the BN/BA interchange service (DFW-IAD-LHR) we have discussed more than a few times
Concorde necessarily had an extremely high fuel burn rate, so unless there was a technical stop planned at the Azores it would appear that Lisbon/LIS (being the closest European destination to ATL) is the logical answer, but that leg is still ~500 miles longer than IAD-LHR
TATL from IAH would have had a very long subsonic leg to the Atlantic coast; alternatively, supersonic over the Gulf of Mexico would have involved either tracking between Florida and Cuba to remain over water or decelerating while crossing the middle of the peninsula, and I seriously doubt either would have been feasible without a fuel stop
I’m whistling in the dark as to a candidate airline besides TAP, so just for grins I’ll say Pan Am
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London, England.
Programs: BA
Posts: 8,476
I seem to recall that an Air Alsace F28 did Strasbourg-Lille-London early morning, then back all the way London-Lille-Strasbourg-Milan by midday, and returned the same in the afternoon/evening. Badged as Air France.
French "geographical" airline names have never meant much to where they were actually operating.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London, England.
Programs: BA
Posts: 8,476
Air inter was anyway owned by a group of Air France, UTA, and the SNCF railway.
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS, DL, UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 10,795
it’s unclear from the way you phrased the question whether the route was IAH-ATL-XXX or there were two separate TATL routes
FAA restrictions on supersonic flight over land would have meant the former was more likely, akin to the BN/BA interchange service (DFW-IAD-LHR) we have discussed more than a few times
Concorde necessarily had an extremely high fuel burn rate, so unless there was a technical stop planned at the Azores it would appear that Lisbon/LIS (being the closest European destination to ATL) is the one logical answer, but that leg is still ~500 miles longer than IAD-LHR
TATL from IAH would have had a very long subsonic leg to the Atlantic coast; alternatively, supersonic over the Gulf of Mexico would have involved either tracking between Florida and Cuba to remain over water or decelerating while crossing the middle of the peninsula, and I seriously doubt either would have been feasible without a fuel stop
I’m whistling in the dark as to a candidate airline besides TAP, so just for grins I’ll say Pan Am
FAA restrictions on supersonic flight over land would have meant the former was more likely, akin to the BN/BA interchange service (DFW-IAD-LHR) we have discussed more than a few times
Concorde necessarily had an extremely high fuel burn rate, so unless there was a technical stop planned at the Azores it would appear that Lisbon/LIS (being the closest European destination to ATL) is the one logical answer, but that leg is still ~500 miles longer than IAD-LHR
TATL from IAH would have had a very long subsonic leg to the Atlantic coast; alternatively, supersonic over the Gulf of Mexico would have involved either tracking between Florida and Cuba to remain over water or decelerating while crossing the middle of the peninsula, and I seriously doubt either would have been feasible without a fuel stop
I’m whistling in the dark as to a candidate airline besides TAP, so just for grins I’ll say Pan Am
And nope, it wasn't Pan Am. Plus we are still looking for the European city.
Last edited by jlemon; Jul 25, 2020 at 12:06 pm
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London, England.
Programs: BA
Posts: 8,476
I think it was XXX - ATL and XXX - IAH although the information I've seen with regard to the airline in question was not clear concerning this....but a technical stop in Gander or Halifax was mentioned for the Atlanta service.
And nope, it wasn't Pan Am. Plus we are still looking for the European city.
And nope, it wasn't Pan Am. Plus we are still looking for the European city.
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LFT
Programs: AA Plat, lots of AA, AS, DL, UA miles, former top level CO Elite (sigh...)
Posts: 10,795
However, there is some good news here as the European city in question was indeed London.
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NYS
Programs: Days of Our Lives, General Hospital
Posts: 1,495
I did fly on one of those 737-100s, only once. It was a late evening flight from EWR that departed late, around midnight, with passengers for it and other delayed flights all milling around the grim, grey basement that passed for a passenger terminal. On the descent into CLE, a flight attendant announced, "Please check the overhead compartments for any personal belongings or small children that you may have placed there."
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NYS
Programs: Days of Our Lives, General Hospital
Posts: 1,495
Back in the late 1990's when I was once again living in the Houston area (and once again plotting my escape from the Big H), I had the opportunity to fly round trip on an Air France Concorde between New York and Paris by redeeming Continental OnePass miles. One would fly first class between Houston Intercontinental and Newark on CO, change airports in the New York area (possibly via scheduled helicopter service although this was not included in the OnePass mileage redemption offer), and then fly with AF on board the Concorde round trip between JFK and CDG. And if memory serves, the trip could have been accomplished for a mere 100,000 CO miles plus a fairly modest surcharge.
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: PDX
Programs: AS DL
Posts: 9,038
We have a winner!
Previously answered: Fokker 28, Air France (operated by another airline, not Air Alpes), LIL-SXB-LIN!
In 1986, it was TAT. The planes, at least most of them if not all, had Air France titles but TAT on the nose.