Boeing vs Airbus
Jul 15, 2011, 10:37 am
#31
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,184
Jul 15, 2011, 10:55 am
#32
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Jul 15, 2011, 10:59 am
#33
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
I love how on threads like this the armchair aerospace engineer in all of us comes out and grand pronouncements on cataclysmic design flaws are exposed, as though the multi-billions invested by Boeing and Airbus were wasted.
Jul 16, 2011, 6:08 am
#35
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: europe, heart of
Posts: 16
Yes but not about comforts. I know comforts is First class every time. This about safety. Which is the safety?
Computers flying is like Terminator "HELLO PILOT I CORRECT - YOU WRONG", but Pilot flying is like human in control all the time.
Pitot on AF 447 have burrs inside. Burrs get ice. Ice cause computers crash. No throttle see from pilot at zero on Airbus. See? Throttle look 100%. No feedbacks see from pilot by hand on Airbus. See? Control sticks like toy.
Also no "MUST DO" bulletins from Airbus urgent replace. AF one year later starts replace but too late everyone dies. Next day pilots say "MUST DO!" All AF pitots changed. This happen after incidents but plane safety land! Also many years after Aeroperu. Why Airbus no give "MUST DO"?
AF replace all pitots one plane each time!!! Stupid!! Not replace one pitot each plane so balance!!! Why? So some plane 3 pitot good other plane all pitot bad. Not Safety!!!
Aero peru 757 was static point not pitot!!! Also no need to crash, just confusion readout Altitude! Can fix by other plane watch and reports! No Terminator computer drive plane into sea, see?
Birgen pilot not listen to stick feedbacks!!! 15 years priors AF447!!! So Boeing safer in 15 years early!!! See?
What you think?
Computers flying is like Terminator "HELLO PILOT I CORRECT - YOU WRONG", but Pilot flying is like human in control all the time.
Pitot on AF 447 have burrs inside. Burrs get ice. Ice cause computers crash. No throttle see from pilot at zero on Airbus. See? Throttle look 100%. No feedbacks see from pilot by hand on Airbus. See? Control sticks like toy.
Also no "MUST DO" bulletins from Airbus urgent replace. AF one year later starts replace but too late everyone dies. Next day pilots say "MUST DO!" All AF pitots changed. This happen after incidents but plane safety land! Also many years after Aeroperu. Why Airbus no give "MUST DO"?
AF replace all pitots one plane each time!!! Stupid!! Not replace one pitot each plane so balance!!! Why? So some plane 3 pitot good other plane all pitot bad. Not Safety!!!
Aero peru 757 was static point not pitot!!! Also no need to crash, just confusion readout Altitude! Can fix by other plane watch and reports! No Terminator computer drive plane into sea, see?
Birgen pilot not listen to stick feedbacks!!! 15 years priors AF447!!! So Boeing safer in 15 years early!!! See?
What you think?
Jul 16, 2011, 6:21 am
#36
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Am I the only one getting visions of Meerkats selling car insurance?
Jul 16, 2011, 6:47 am
#37
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Alabama
Programs: DL GM
Posts: 158
Yes but not about comforts. I know comforts is First class every time. This about safety. Which is the safety?
Computers flying is like Terminator "HELLO PILOT I CORRECT - YOU WRONG", but Pilot flying is like human in control all the time.
Pitot on AF 447 have burrs inside. Burrs get ice. Ice cause computers crash. No throttle see from pilot at zero on Airbus. See? Throttle look 100%. No feedbacks see from pilot by hand on Airbus. See? Control sticks like toy.
Also no "MUST DO" bulletins from Airbus urgent replace. AF one year later starts replace but too late everyone dies. Next day pilots say "MUST DO!" All AF pitots changed. This happen after incidents but plane safety land! Also many years after Aeroperu. Why Airbus no give "MUST DO"?
AF replace all pitots one plane each time!!! Stupid!! Not replace one pitot each plane so balance!!! Why? So some plane 3 pitot good other plane all pitot bad. Not Safety!!!
Aero peru 757 was static point not pitot!!! Also no need to crash, just confusion readout Altitude! Can fix by other plane watch and reports! No Terminator computer drive plane into sea, see?
Birgen pilot not listen to stick feedbacks!!! 15 years priors AF447!!! So Boeing safer in 15 years early!!! See?
What you think?
Computers flying is like Terminator "HELLO PILOT I CORRECT - YOU WRONG", but Pilot flying is like human in control all the time.
Pitot on AF 447 have burrs inside. Burrs get ice. Ice cause computers crash. No throttle see from pilot at zero on Airbus. See? Throttle look 100%. No feedbacks see from pilot by hand on Airbus. See? Control sticks like toy.
Also no "MUST DO" bulletins from Airbus urgent replace. AF one year later starts replace but too late everyone dies. Next day pilots say "MUST DO!" All AF pitots changed. This happen after incidents but plane safety land! Also many years after Aeroperu. Why Airbus no give "MUST DO"?
AF replace all pitots one plane each time!!! Stupid!! Not replace one pitot each plane so balance!!! Why? So some plane 3 pitot good other plane all pitot bad. Not Safety!!!
Aero peru 757 was static point not pitot!!! Also no need to crash, just confusion readout Altitude! Can fix by other plane watch and reports! No Terminator computer drive plane into sea, see?
Birgen pilot not listen to stick feedbacks!!! 15 years priors AF447!!! So Boeing safer in 15 years early!!! See?
What you think?
To be able to fly passengers, ALL aircraft designs must pass many rigorous government specifications and tests. Even with such requirements, flaws do pass through. For example, the 737 rudder issue that came up a number of years ago or the icing problem with the ATR72. Some issues require work on the airplane and some require a change in the acceptable operating parameters. We, the passengers, just end up safer in the long run.
Jul 16, 2011, 6:50 am
#38
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 634
Oh, and by the way, Simples!
Jul 16, 2011, 7:23 am
#39
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Jul 16, 2011, 1:23 pm
#40
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: europe, heart of
Posts: 16
No I seek truth!!! What is safety!!!?? I have knowledge theory from reading AF447 crash but what is true?, what not? - I must learn. I am not pilot of Airbus and Boeing, see?
So what you think?
So what you think?
Jul 16, 2011, 3:05 pm
#41
Join Date: Jan 2011
Programs: Delta, UA
Posts: 127
Co si myslím, že byste měli používat Google Translate vyrobit nějaký srozumitelné angličtiny.
Jul 16, 2011, 3:49 pm
#42
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
I think this is a big pile of BS. Please let's shut this thread down.
Jul 16, 2011, 4:53 pm
#43
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: europe, heart of
Posts: 16
Friends much dissapointed. I want debate to see bestist! Safety bestist! Not for personal attacks, or deflect important debates, or take sides!
This real serious debate topics! Many people who fly only two arms, two legs, one head, one life - much important for safety!
So what you afraid?
This real serious debate topics! Many people who fly only two arms, two legs, one head, one life - much important for safety!
So what you afraid?
Jul 16, 2011, 5:02 pm
#44
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Away offshore
Programs: UA Silver, HH Diamond, peasant elsewhere
Posts: 247
OP, ever heard of airliners.net? This is the kind of mangled-English, amateur-hour stuff they love over there...
Jul 16, 2011, 6:00 pm
#45
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974