Rude/ignorant passenger bin actions
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA USA (SFO/SJC)
Programs: 1K 2010, 1P in 2011, Plat for 2012,13,14,15 & 2016. Gold in 17 & 18, Plat since
Posts: 8,826
Rude/ignorant passenger bin actions
Last nights weather-delayed UA 225, IAD-SFO, was further delayed during boarding by something I haven't seen before-
Early-boarding passengers with seats towards the back of the plane (which doesn't make sense, does it?) placing their rollaboards in the first-available compartment they come to.
It was nuts; I've never seen anything like it, but I watched as several people boarding in front of me snagged the first-available overhead bin and kept on walking... even though the bins were empty at the back. I was in row 6, boarding in front of seating group #1, and had to use bins above row 13. It got worse for those boarding after me, and having to swim against the oncoming tide of passengers to get back to our seats made the boarding process painfully long.
We also had a number of people with obviously-too-large bags they were placing in lengthwise. No announcements were made about overhead protocol until the aisle was filled with people unable to find room for their bags. FAs were making comments about how "security" should have spotted the oversized bags, but they made no announcements about overhead bin issues until it was far too late, and they were definitely in a position to see passengers putting their gear in bins up front and walking back.
So I'm curious, why would people do this (put their gear up front when they're sitting in back and it's obvious there's space there), and wouldn't it make sense to enforce bin policies early on rather than waiting until it's a too-late issue?
Or was this a very strange flight and nobody's ever seen this happen before? If bins in F were full, sure, I can see overflow F baggage heading into Y, but that wasn't the case.
As for those who have to place a bag sideways in a 757 or any other properly-designed overhead (not the 767 obviously!), I say throw 'em off the plane.
Early-boarding passengers with seats towards the back of the plane (which doesn't make sense, does it?) placing their rollaboards in the first-available compartment they come to.
It was nuts; I've never seen anything like it, but I watched as several people boarding in front of me snagged the first-available overhead bin and kept on walking... even though the bins were empty at the back. I was in row 6, boarding in front of seating group #1, and had to use bins above row 13. It got worse for those boarding after me, and having to swim against the oncoming tide of passengers to get back to our seats made the boarding process painfully long.
We also had a number of people with obviously-too-large bags they were placing in lengthwise. No announcements were made about overhead protocol until the aisle was filled with people unable to find room for their bags. FAs were making comments about how "security" should have spotted the oversized bags, but they made no announcements about overhead bin issues until it was far too late, and they were definitely in a position to see passengers putting their gear in bins up front and walking back.
So I'm curious, why would people do this (put their gear up front when they're sitting in back and it's obvious there's space there), and wouldn't it make sense to enforce bin policies early on rather than waiting until it's a too-late issue?
Or was this a very strange flight and nobody's ever seen this happen before? If bins in F were full, sure, I can see overflow F baggage heading into Y, but that wasn't the case.
As for those who have to place a bag sideways in a 757 or any other properly-designed overhead (not the 767 obviously!), I say throw 'em off the plane.
#2
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 350
Within your own seating class, bin space is shared storage, putting items in a bin near your seat is an option (a courteous one) not a requirement.
As far as why you would, if you're sure you won't need it, it's the most convenient place to put it.
Also, IME, possibly because they're the ones with the opportunity, fliers with elite status are the most likely "offenders".
As far as why you would, if you're sure you won't need it, it's the most convenient place to put it.
Also, IME, possibly because they're the ones with the opportunity, fliers with elite status are the most likely "offenders".
#3
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,850
IMHO -- you need to use your assigned cabin bins
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Programs: Hyatt Diamond, Fairmont Platinum, Aeroplan Diamond, HHonors Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 18,686
Within your own seating class, bin space is shared storage, putting items in a bin near your seat is an option (a courteous one) not a requirement.
As far as why you would, if you're sure you won't need it, it's the most convenient place to put it.
Also, IME, possibly because they're the ones with the opportunity, fliers with elite status are the most likely "offenders".
As far as why you would, if you're sure you won't need it, it's the most convenient place to put it.
Also, IME, possibly because they're the ones with the opportunity, fliers with elite status are the most likely "offenders".
Seems to make a lot more sense if one should store their belongings in the vicinity.
#5
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central Virginia
Programs: UA 2MM
Posts: 1,231
Early-boarding passengers with seats towards the back of the plane (which doesn't make sense, does it?) placing their rollaboards in the first-available compartment they come to.
As for those who have to place a bag sideways in a 757 or any other properly-designed overhead (not the 767 obviously!), I say throw 'em off the plane.
As for those who have to place a bag sideways in a 757 or any other properly-designed overhead (not the 767 obviously!), I say throw 'em off the plane.
#7
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA USA (SFO/SJC)
Programs: 1K 2010, 1P in 2011, Plat for 2012,13,14,15 & 2016. Gold in 17 & 18, Plat since
Posts: 8,826
If you're in the first third of those boarding, and you're in the middle to rear of the plane, there's no need to grab the first-available overhead bin for your luggage.
Within your own seating class, bin space is shared storage, putting items in a bin near your seat is an option (a courteous one) not a requirement.
As far as why you would, if you're sure you won't need it, it's the most convenient place to put it.
Also, IME, possibly because they're the ones with the opportunity, fliers with elite status are the most likely "offenders".
As far as why you would, if you're sure you won't need it, it's the most convenient place to put it.
Also, IME, possibly because they're the ones with the opportunity, fliers with elite status are the most likely "offenders".
Last edited by Mike Jacoubowsky; Mar 11, 2011 at 7:38 pm Reason: merged replies
#8
In Memoriam
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
It's quite common, people get on the plane, and either feel the chance of them getting space in the back is like nothing or don't want to carry the bag all the way back and out again, so they grab the first space they can.
Of course, if enough people do it, the bins in the back stay empty so the people who board last (those sitting up front) have to put their bag all the way in the back, and then wait till everybody gets off to go back and get it.
There's not much you can do about it, it's just how some people are, and I guess it only takes once to get all the way to the back and not have any space and fight the line to get back to the front again to consider it.
Of course, if enough people do it, the bins in the back stay empty so the people who board last (those sitting up front) have to put their bag all the way in the back, and then wait till everybody gets off to go back and get it.
There's not much you can do about it, it's just how some people are, and I guess it only takes once to get all the way to the back and not have any space and fight the line to get back to the front again to consider it.
#10
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,358
I agree with you in principle. However, when we are on a 767, the bins are small and it is not possible to put a regulation size bag straight in. It must go on its side.
-
#11
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA USA (SFO/SJC)
Programs: 1K 2010, 1P in 2011, Plat for 2012,13,14,15 & 2016. Gold in 17 & 18, Plat since
Posts: 8,826
Agreed; I mentioned the 767 issue in my original post. Who designed those things? I guess it's obvious they're a lot better made than anything in your kitchen else there would have been plenty of opportunities to update. :-)
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA USA (SFO/SJC)
Programs: 1K 2010, 1P in 2011, Plat for 2012,13,14,15 & 2016. Gold in 17 & 18, Plat since
Posts: 8,826
#14
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,358
There are many good reasons passengers carry on their conforming size luggage.
I do not recall reading that the OP "insisted" he bring carry on luggage aboard. I assumed he is like many who fly, he prefers not to check his luggage which is a right of any passenger (cake or no cake).
Even if he selected a seat in the back of the airplane, there is no guaranty that he would find an open space in the overhead bins by the time he got to the back of the plane.
I think the OP assertions are logical and reasonable. However, to advise him to check his luggage or sit in the back of the aircraft is not reasonable.
-
#15
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SFO
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 5,270
Don't see how you could do much about it, being stuck 15 rows back in an aisle clogged with passengers