FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   TravelBuzz (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz-176/)
-   -   B 747 Upper deck (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz/1184183-b-747-upper-deck.html)

AndyPatterson Feb 14, 2011 9:14 pm

B 747 Upper deck
 
The B 747 upper deck sure looks spacious when it is empty!

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...4200928/4.html

This photo was too good not to share, although I suspect that UA/CO are far from ordering the 747-800, alas.

nycr Feb 14, 2011 9:17 pm

748 has a larger upper deck than 744...

flyinbob Feb 14, 2011 9:17 pm

This is the new 747, which I understand has a larger upper deck than the UA 744s.

SFflyer123 Feb 14, 2011 9:18 pm

nice photos!
 
Great to see. It seems that Boeing could have almost just extended the upper deck all the way to the back and make their own super-jumbo!

AndyPatterson Feb 14, 2011 9:19 pm


Originally Posted by flyinbob (Post 15865601)
This is the new 747, which I understand has a larger upper deck than the UA 744s.

Indeed, the upper deck seems to be almost twice as long...

Kurt Feb 14, 2011 10:03 pm

Great photos. Much prettier than the A380! Please, please, please let UA order this aircraft! (Although I know it is not likely, I can still dream.)

tkruger206 Feb 14, 2011 10:16 pm


Originally Posted by Kurt (Post 15865802)
Great photos. Much prettier than the A380!

Agreed, the A380s look... well... fat. The 74 has a regal look to it (IMO). Being from Seattle i'm also a little biased.

And I wouldn't want a full upper deck, I like the exclusiveness of the UD. Can't wait to see the interior of a new 787 or 748 first hand.

SQ421 Feb 15, 2011 12:52 am

Love the aircraft, not so much the red colour though. IMHO, the 787 blue would've looked great on this frame too...

AlphaDelta Feb 16, 2011 11:35 pm


Originally Posted by SQ421 (Post 15866257)
Love the aircraft, not so much the red colour though. IMHO, the 787 blue would've looked great on this frame too...

I thought the same when I first saw it, but i'm starting to warm up to it. The upper deck on the 747-8i is apparently suposed to hold 31 more pax than the 744 (http://www.seattlepi.com/business/251973_air14.html).

TrojanHorse Feb 17, 2011 4:41 am


Originally Posted by tkruger206 (Post 15865849)
Agreed, the A380s look... well... fat. The 74 has a regal look to it (IMO). Being from Seattle i'm also a little biased.

And I wouldn't want a full upper deck, I like the exclusiveness of the UD. Can't wait to see the interior of a new 787 or 748 first hand.

do you guys really care how "pretty" the plane looks from the outside LOL?

rjw242 Feb 17, 2011 9:03 am


Originally Posted by TrojanHorse (Post 15880825)
do you guys really care how "pretty" the plane looks from the outside LOL?

Sure. There's not much else to look at while hanging out in an airport lounge.

uncertaintraveler Feb 17, 2011 9:12 am

The plane looks "stubby" to me. Like something a child would draw or the kind of soft/plush toy plane you'd buy at a store. It just looks too fat at the nose, which makes the plane look too short overall.

wilp888 Feb 17, 2011 2:21 pm

The overhead bins look larger than the current useless ones.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:23 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.