FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   TravelBuzz (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz-176/)
-   -   freight trains? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz/1104913-freight-trains.html)

moondog Jul 13, 2010 4:06 pm


Originally Posted by davef139 (Post 14293707)
I work in logistics so I can tell you trains are used quite often on long haul routes. The most common useage to most is by UPS/FDX which ground packages going cross country use. Think CACH / Hodgkins.
Since rail is cheap compared to 53' trucks, containers are a big winner here, I know we get containers delviered from a rail yard every so often as it travels from Dallas to Chicago. Trains are a bit cheaper but the biggest problem is timing of shipments.

Thanks for your info. Just out of curiosity, how do 18 wheelers fit into the FedEX UPS game plan? (I think all of us understand the purpose of the cargo vans, but based on your comments, one would think the cargo vans could bring parcels directly to facilities that are tied to rail yards.)

davef139 Jul 13, 2010 4:22 pm

I suppose thats false as the most common useage is bulk material and heavy material, the old GM plant here had quite a bit trained in. But the most common useage someone would know about are things like UPS/FedEx. I belive semis are used on a local transport while trains are used from major distribution centers going cross country.

You may be surprised but I would guess that quite a few consumer goods are shipped via rail to massive dc's from plants. A good example would be Pringles, as they are made in 1 place in the US in Jackson, TN. I would guess that they get loaded on trains to go out west as most midwest are truckable being a day away.

beckoa Jul 14, 2010 3:27 am

I was always amused when I saw some brand new 737 fuselages outside of Frys Electronics in SEA a few years ago... they had to ride the rail before they graced the sky. :cool:

In Alaska we get the bulk of our goods by ship 3x a week and from there some is distributed by the Alaska Railroad to FAI... The AKRR also transports quite a bit of raw materials including coal and fuel. Most of ANC's Jet-A came from a refinery near FAI (and I think still does).

BryanIAH Jul 14, 2010 4:30 am


Originally Posted by N965VJ (Post 14291218)
Hop on this one and you might earn some miles. :D

Is it just me or did someone write "NWA" on the door? I would take miles from a defunct Pan-Am over SkyPesos.

jackal Jul 14, 2010 5:27 am


Originally Posted by moondog (Post 14290205)
This topic is borderline OMNI, but since it is theoretically possible for us to jump on freight trains and I want everyone to get proper post credit, I'm placing it here.

I've always wondered where the freight trains I see every day go. My hunch is that their routes are relatively boring.

From PDX? Most likely SEA, OAK, LAX, or ORD. There are major tracks belonging to UP heading south to the Bay Area and Los Angeles and west to the entire Midwest (following the Columbia River Gorge) as well as major tracks belonging to BNSF heading north to Seattle and west to Chicago (via Spokane also along the Columbia River Gorge--BNSF owns the tracks on the Washington side while UP owns the tracks on the Oregon side).

There are also some shortlines running smaller loads along lower-traffic, shorter-distance routes, such as the PNWR out towards Astoria (Tongue Point), the WPRR to various farming areas in the Willamette Valley and out to Newport on the Oregon Coast, and even the CORP heading down to Coos Bay. Those routes are probably lucky to see one medium-length train per day, though, so I doubt you're seeing those. You're most likely seeing the big UP or BNSF boys heading hundreds or thousands of miles away.

Check these maps out:
http://www.uprr.com/aboutup/maps/sysmap.shtml
http://www.bnsf.com/customers/where-...ditional-maps/


Originally Posted by moondog (Post 14290205)
Secondly, about once every two weeks, I get held up at a particular intersection in SE Portland for ~20 minutes because an enormous train passes by at around 10:10a. Since the road in question is fairly busy, I always wonder why the train company doesn't reschedule it to run at a less inconvenient time, and who I could possibly complain to about its shear existence.

Who to complain to? Probably your city councilman or the mayor. The railroad's operations department probably won't care about an individual complaint from someone stuck in traffic, but it might not hurt to try. First you'll need to identify which railroad to complain to. Arrive at your crossing early enough to see the locomotives on the front. While that's not a completely foolproof way to check, since railroads often do have "trackage rights" on their competitors' tracks and even borrow locomotives from one another, it's a start. Then, check their website for contact options and go from there. You'll of course need to be able to describe which crossing is being blocked--the best way would be to look for a sign near the crossing gates about reporting an emergency and seeing if it has any identifying information; failing that, name the street you're on and perhaps take note of the nearest cross street, since other tracks belonging to that railroad may cross your street at different places.

Train scheduling is largely done without regard to local issues, though--for one, the tracks were usually there first, and second, the railroads have a much bigger logistical picture to be aware of. Not only do they have to factor other traffic (for example, your 10:10 train may be scheduled for a slot on the transcontinental line to Kansas City in between a 9:55 train taking lumber, propane, grain, and other goods to Walla Walla and a 10:30 intermodal train coming down from the Port of Seattle headed to Chicago. All three need to use the same track east of Portland, and like airplanes, they need to be spaced apart enough to allow them to travel safely. Delaying your 10:10 affects the 10:30 transcon to Chicago, which can have repercussions ranging from tangling with Wyoming coal train traffic to blocking major crossings in Chicago right at the 8:00am rush hour to having goods arrive in Chicago too late for their customers' cutoffs.


Originally Posted by choster (Post 14291466)
For bulk cargo, nothing on land will beat trains for efficiency.

Absolutely. Take a peek at the tables in this Wikipedia article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_ef...transportation

You can see how much more fuel efficient rail travel is compared to truck travel and especially air freight.


Originally Posted by sbm12 (Post 14292252)
More likely, however, is that the train is scheduled based on when it can get on the tracks and when it can get between the places it needs to be in a timely manner with very little attention paid to the impact on road crossings at any point along the way.

And as I mentioned above, "the places it needs to be" can be thousands of miles from you. When looking at a picture that big, the little inconveniences along the way don't look all that important. ;)


Originally Posted by cordelli (Post 14292803)
In many areas, the freight shares the same rail as passenger rail, so they need to schedule around those. It could also have something to do with the dock workers schedule or whatever, bridge opening and closing times up the line, there's probably hundreds of things that go into it. Pretty sure once they get something that works, they don't want to change it.

Absolutely. Many, many factors go into planning the train schedules (not even counting "extras" that are called as need arises). Crossing blockages are not high up on the priority list.

The Alaska Railroad recently announced a special site for people affected by the movements of gravel trains:

http://www.alaskarailroad.com/corpor...9/Default.aspx

From that site:


Gravel Scheduling

A number of factors influence gravel train scheduling:

Noise Ordinance: Some gravel/rock production facilities cannot unload gravel trains between 10:00 pm and 6:00 am due to a city noise ordinance. A daytime unloading schedule is used for these customers. A night-time unloading schedule may be used at facilities that are not subject to a noise ordinance. This day/night cycle is not always possible if one customer requires two gravel trains per day.

Passenger / Freight Train Schedules: Activity on the track increases in the summer with the addition of daily passenger and gravel trains, as well as work trains and heavy equipment used for track maintenance. Between South Anchorage and the Mat-Su area, up to 30 different types of train movements can occur on any given day. This poses a daily challenge, because changing the train movement schedule at one location directly impacts the time the same train passes through at another location. Gravel trains must frequently pull into sidings to allow other trains to pass. The Alaska Railroad strives to meet train customer needs, while minimizing negative impacts to the traveling public. Even so, some conflicts are inevitable and unavoidable.

Cost-efficiency: The capital cost to purchase one 86-car gravel train consist is about $9 million. To be cost-effective, it is essential for each gravel train to cycle twice per day. Inefficient single-cycle gravel operations would lead to higher costs to our customers and ultimately to the public consumers.
I find it interesting that the railroad lays the blame for daytime crossing blockages squarely at the feet of local noise ordinances. (A well-intentioned ordinance by some overzealous local assemblyman has, as always happens in government, unintended consequences.) It also does a pretty good job of explaining why that has to happen (it takes just about 12 hours to take the train out to the quarries in Palmer and Wasilla, load them with gravel, bring the train back into Anchorage, and dump the gravel at the local processing facilities).

The one thing I'd add to your quote above is that the railroads--particularly UP--pay little attention to passenger train scheduling. They own the tracks, and they're obviously interested in making the most money they can with their own movements. Despite a federal mandate (created when Amtrak was formed in 1971) giving passenger trains priority, the railroads have historically treated Amtrak as the red-headed stepchild of the transportation industry. Next time your Amtrak train is late, you'll know who to blame.


Originally Posted by davef139 (Post 14293707)
I work in logistics so I can tell you trains are used quite often on long haul routes. The most common useage to most is by UPS/FDX which ground packages going cross country use. Think CACH / Hodgkins.
Since rail is cheap compared to 53' trucks, containers are a big winner here, I know we get containers delviered from a rail yard every so often as it travels from Dallas to Chicago. Trains are a bit cheaper but the biggest problem is timing of shipments.

Only thing I'd mention about the above is that, unless contracts have been renegotiated in the last year (I haven't paid attention since then), UPS uses rail transport heavily while FedEx chooses to use team-driven trucks. It's the rare case, if ever, when FedEx goods travel by rail. UPS, in contrast, is one of the largest customers of the rail industry. Ultra-high-priority trains like the ZLACWSP ("hot," high-priority Z train from Los Angeles, California to Willow SPrings, IL, near UPS's giant CACH (Chicago Area Consolidated Hub) on the historic and important AT&SF Transcon route paralleling I-40 and the reverse ZWSPLAC) are virtually dedicated to UPS's important ground operation and are scheduled precisely to depart from and arrive at the given sorting hubs just in time for their respective sort operations. Check out this thread for some potentially interesting info from the train nuts over at TrainOrders:

http://www.trainorders.com/discussion/read.php?1,185021

According to a UPS official, UPS will try to move goods moving more than 700 miles away by rail. Shorter movements are generally better done by truck.

More cool info about how UPS works with CACH here:

http://www.trains.com/trn/default.aspx?c=a&id=549

And an interesting article about the modern state of intermodal freight transport:

http://www.worldtrademag.com/Article...00000000726114


Originally Posted by moondog (Post 14294326)
Thanks for your info. Just out of curiosity, how do 18 wheelers fit into the FedEX UPS game plan? (I think all of us understand the purpose of the cargo vans, but based on your comments, one would think the cargo vans could bring parcels directly to facilities that are tied to rail yards.)

See above. Semi-trucks are used on shorter but denser hauls (under 400-700 miles). For example, if you drop off a shipment in St. Cloud, Minnesota destined for Sacramento, California, your shipment would probably follow a route like this:

VAN: St. Cloud to Minneapolis
18-WHEELER: Minneapolis to Chicago (CACH)
TRAIN (ZWSPRIC): Chicago to Richmond, CA (Bay Area)
18-WHEELER: Richmond to Sacramento
VAN: Sacramento to your recipient

If you were shipping from St. Cloud to Lincoln, NE, you may see something more like this:
VAN: St. Cloud to Minneapolis
18-WHEELER: Minneapolis to Omaha
18-WHEELER: Omaha to Lincoln
VAN: Lincoln to recipient

If there were enough traffic between Minneapolis and Lincoln, you might even see an 18-wheeler go directly between the two, skipping Omaha.


Originally Posted by beckoa (Post 14297111)
I was always amused when I saw some brand new 737 fuselages outside of Frys Electronics in SEA a few years ago... they had to ride the rail before they graced the sky. :cool:

In Alaska we get the bulk of our goods by ship 3x a week and from there some is distributed by the Alaska Railroad to FAI... The AKRR also transports quite a bit of raw materials including coal and fuel. Most of ANC's Jet-A came from a refinery near FAI (and I think still does).

Correct. In the summer, a full train (100 cars per day) heads north from Anchorage filled with lumber, chemicals processed out of state, and even construction equipment (shovels, tractors, etc.) and all kinds of raw goods. Most of these arrive either on the container ships docking in Anchorage or the specialized rail barges docking in Whittier, which actually bring entire railcars pre-stocked with goods up from the Lower 48 (the railcars are then offloaded directly onto the Alaska Railroad's tracks in Whittier and taken through the Anton Anderson Memorial Tunnel to Anchorage for sorting and then onto Fairbanks in the northbound daily freight. At the same time as the freight is going north, a 100-car train of tankers is bringing Jet-A and unleaded fuel south from the North Pole Refinery just outside of Fairbanks (of course, 12 hours later, those trains are heading back the opposite way empty). It takes two tank cars to fill a 747 (which, as participants in the http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/commu...14-2010-a.html know, is by far the most common aircraft at ANC; ANC is a major refueling point for TransPac cargo flights, and cargo represents 75% of the airport's revenue), and each tank car can carry the equivalent of three tanker trucks. That's a lot of gas! In addition, in the summertime, the ARR runs a daily northbound and daily southbound passenger train to Fairbanks, a daily round-trip passenger to Seward, and three to four daily gravel trains between Anchorage and the Mat-Su Valley. In addition, there's a once- or twice-weekly coal train from the Usibelli coal mine near Denali National Park to the port in Seward, where it is loaded onto ships bound for South Korea. That's not counting the numerous local trains delivering anywhere from one to ten cars to individual customers along the railway. (In the winter, that traffic drops down to one combined daily fuel/freight and one weekly passenger train.) That volume pales in comparison, though, to a major rail terminal like PDX!

Sweet Willie Jul 14, 2010 8:51 am


Originally Posted by DJ Bitterbarn (Post 14290488)
..... it's amazing how when you get just off that road the whole landscape changes..

exactly !! I even love watching the world move by taking a short commuter train into Chicago and would love to have the time to put more train travel into our trips.

I do recall my buddies & I hopping into an open freight railcar of a train that was stopped near our regular crossing. We thought we'd ride it for a bit when the train started up, then hop off before it got going too fast. Too bad for us that this was a short train and got up to speed very quickly. Thankfully it had to stop for something else about 20 miles away and VERY thankfully there was a parent willing to come pick us up. WHEW:)

sbm12 Jul 14, 2010 8:57 am


Originally Posted by jackal (Post 14297368)
From PDX? Most likely SEA, OAK, LAX, or ORD. ...

Need a handkerchief for that foam coming off your mouth?? ;) :p

vtmike Jul 14, 2010 9:44 am


Originally Posted by jackal (Post 14297368)
Only thing I'd mention about the above is that, unless contracts have been renegotiated in the last year (I haven't paid attention since then), UPS uses rail transport heavily while FedEx chooses to use team-driven trucks. It's the rare case, if ever, when FedEx goods travel by rail. UPS, in contrast, is one of the largest customers of the rail industry. Ultra-high-priority trains like the ZLACWSP ("hot," high-priority Z train from Los Angeles, California to Willow SPrings, IL, near UPS's giant CACH (Chicago Area Consolidated Hub) on the historic and important AT&SF Transcon route paralleling I-40 and the reverse ZWSPLAC) are virtually dedicated to UPS's important ground operation and are scheduled precisely to depart from and arrive at the given sorting hubs just in time for their respective sort operations. Check out this thread for some potentially interesting info from the train nuts over at TrainOrders:

http://www.trainorders.com/discussion/read.php?1,185021

According to a UPS official, UPS will try to move goods moving more than 700 miles away by rail. Shorter movements are generally better done by truck.

More cool info about how UPS works with CACH here:

http://www.trains.com/trn/default.aspx?c=a&id=549

And an interesting article about the modern state of intermodal freight transport:

http://www.worldtrademag.com/Article...00000000726114

Thanks for the links. Some interesting reads there. I worked for UPS as a loader back in high school at the Chantilly, VA facility. For part of my time there each night, I loaded most of two 24 foot rail trailers bound for CACH as well as about a quarter of a 50 foot trailer bound for LA. If I remember correctly these trailers along with a bunch of other non rail ones we loaded went to Burtonsville, MD Hub to be filled some. From there they would more before getting loaded on a train in case rail trailers or driven else where in the case of road trailers.

For anyone that is curious as they are passing by UPS semi, you can tell the difference between a rail trailer and road trailer. The rail trailer has a flat bottom while the road trailer has a pit in it. The road trailers were far easier to load as they have rollers built in and don't require a step stool to load all the way the ceiling, unlike rail trailers.

UPS was big on promoting from within and one the things they always benefits brought up about driving the 18 wheelers for them was that the driver never overnighted anywhere. Always out and back on the same shift. Hence the reason why you rarely see a UPS semi with a sleeper cab, where as a lot of Fedex Ground semis do. Without there heavy use rails they probably wouldn't be able to effectively offer this benefit.

jackal Jul 14, 2010 4:30 pm


Originally Posted by sbm12 (Post 14298311)
Need a handkerchief for that foam coming off your mouth?? ;) :p

:p

beckoa Jul 20, 2010 3:14 am


Originally Posted by sbm12 (Post 14298311)
Need a handkerchief for that foam coming off your mouth?? ;) :p

He tends to do that around trains ;)

jackal Jul 20, 2010 3:24 am


Originally Posted by beckoa (Post 14331377)
He tends to do that around trains ;)

:rolleyes:

I'm quite normal in comparison to some of the people out there who do silly things like pay for a Trainorders.com membership. Me? I just like to ride 'em... ;)

beckoa Jul 22, 2010 12:09 am


Originally Posted by jackal (Post 14331409)
:rolleyes:

I'm quite normal in comparison to some of the people out there who do silly things like pay for a Trainorders.com membership. Me? I just like to ride 'em... ;)

Wow... I thought airliners.net was $$ :eek:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:49 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.