![]() |
Originally Posted by davef139
(Post 14293707)
I work in logistics so I can tell you trains are used quite often on long haul routes. The most common useage to most is by UPS/FDX which ground packages going cross country use. Think CACH / Hodgkins.
Since rail is cheap compared to 53' trucks, containers are a big winner here, I know we get containers delviered from a rail yard every so often as it travels from Dallas to Chicago. Trains are a bit cheaper but the biggest problem is timing of shipments. |
I suppose thats false as the most common useage is bulk material and heavy material, the old GM plant here had quite a bit trained in. But the most common useage someone would know about are things like UPS/FedEx. I belive semis are used on a local transport while trains are used from major distribution centers going cross country.
You may be surprised but I would guess that quite a few consumer goods are shipped via rail to massive dc's from plants. A good example would be Pringles, as they are made in 1 place in the US in Jackson, TN. I would guess that they get loaded on trains to go out west as most midwest are truckable being a day away. |
I was always amused when I saw some brand new 737 fuselages outside of Frys Electronics in SEA a few years ago... they had to ride the rail before they graced the sky. :cool:
In Alaska we get the bulk of our goods by ship 3x a week and from there some is distributed by the Alaska Railroad to FAI... The AKRR also transports quite a bit of raw materials including coal and fuel. Most of ANC's Jet-A came from a refinery near FAI (and I think still does). |
|
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 14290205)
This topic is borderline OMNI, but since it is theoretically possible for us to jump on freight trains and I want everyone to get proper post credit, I'm placing it here.
I've always wondered where the freight trains I see every day go. My hunch is that their routes are relatively boring. There are also some shortlines running smaller loads along lower-traffic, shorter-distance routes, such as the PNWR out towards Astoria (Tongue Point), the WPRR to various farming areas in the Willamette Valley and out to Newport on the Oregon Coast, and even the CORP heading down to Coos Bay. Those routes are probably lucky to see one medium-length train per day, though, so I doubt you're seeing those. You're most likely seeing the big UP or BNSF boys heading hundreds or thousands of miles away. Check these maps out: http://www.uprr.com/aboutup/maps/sysmap.shtml http://www.bnsf.com/customers/where-...ditional-maps/
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 14290205)
Secondly, about once every two weeks, I get held up at a particular intersection in SE Portland for ~20 minutes because an enormous train passes by at around 10:10a. Since the road in question is fairly busy, I always wonder why the train company doesn't reschedule it to run at a less inconvenient time, and who I could possibly complain to about its shear existence.
Train scheduling is largely done without regard to local issues, though--for one, the tracks were usually there first, and second, the railroads have a much bigger logistical picture to be aware of. Not only do they have to factor other traffic (for example, your 10:10 train may be scheduled for a slot on the transcontinental line to Kansas City in between a 9:55 train taking lumber, propane, grain, and other goods to Walla Walla and a 10:30 intermodal train coming down from the Port of Seattle headed to Chicago. All three need to use the same track east of Portland, and like airplanes, they need to be spaced apart enough to allow them to travel safely. Delaying your 10:10 affects the 10:30 transcon to Chicago, which can have repercussions ranging from tangling with Wyoming coal train traffic to blocking major crossings in Chicago right at the 8:00am rush hour to having goods arrive in Chicago too late for their customers' cutoffs.
Originally Posted by choster
(Post 14291466)
For bulk cargo, nothing on land will beat trains for efficiency.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_ef...transportation You can see how much more fuel efficient rail travel is compared to truck travel and especially air freight.
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 14292252)
More likely, however, is that the train is scheduled based on when it can get on the tracks and when it can get between the places it needs to be in a timely manner with very little attention paid to the impact on road crossings at any point along the way.
Originally Posted by cordelli
(Post 14292803)
In many areas, the freight shares the same rail as passenger rail, so they need to schedule around those. It could also have something to do with the dock workers schedule or whatever, bridge opening and closing times up the line, there's probably hundreds of things that go into it. Pretty sure once they get something that works, they don't want to change it.
The Alaska Railroad recently announced a special site for people affected by the movements of gravel trains: http://www.alaskarailroad.com/corpor...9/Default.aspx From that site: Gravel Scheduling A number of factors influence gravel train scheduling: Noise Ordinance: Some gravel/rock production facilities cannot unload gravel trains between 10:00 pm and 6:00 am due to a city noise ordinance. A daytime unloading schedule is used for these customers. A night-time unloading schedule may be used at facilities that are not subject to a noise ordinance. This day/night cycle is not always possible if one customer requires two gravel trains per day. Passenger / Freight Train Schedules: Activity on the track increases in the summer with the addition of daily passenger and gravel trains, as well as work trains and heavy equipment used for track maintenance. Between South Anchorage and the Mat-Su area, up to 30 different types of train movements can occur on any given day. This poses a daily challenge, because changing the train movement schedule at one location directly impacts the time the same train passes through at another location. Gravel trains must frequently pull into sidings to allow other trains to pass. The Alaska Railroad strives to meet train customer needs, while minimizing negative impacts to the traveling public. Even so, some conflicts are inevitable and unavoidable. Cost-efficiency: The capital cost to purchase one 86-car gravel train consist is about $9 million. To be cost-effective, it is essential for each gravel train to cycle twice per day. Inefficient single-cycle gravel operations would lead to higher costs to our customers and ultimately to the public consumers. The one thing I'd add to your quote above is that the railroads--particularly UP--pay little attention to passenger train scheduling. They own the tracks, and they're obviously interested in making the most money they can with their own movements. Despite a federal mandate (created when Amtrak was formed in 1971) giving passenger trains priority, the railroads have historically treated Amtrak as the red-headed stepchild of the transportation industry. Next time your Amtrak train is late, you'll know who to blame.
Originally Posted by davef139
(Post 14293707)
I work in logistics so I can tell you trains are used quite often on long haul routes. The most common useage to most is by UPS/FDX which ground packages going cross country use. Think CACH / Hodgkins.
Since rail is cheap compared to 53' trucks, containers are a big winner here, I know we get containers delviered from a rail yard every so often as it travels from Dallas to Chicago. Trains are a bit cheaper but the biggest problem is timing of shipments. http://www.trainorders.com/discussion/read.php?1,185021 According to a UPS official, UPS will try to move goods moving more than 700 miles away by rail. Shorter movements are generally better done by truck. More cool info about how UPS works with CACH here: http://www.trains.com/trn/default.aspx?c=a&id=549 And an interesting article about the modern state of intermodal freight transport: http://www.worldtrademag.com/Article...00000000726114
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 14294326)
Thanks for your info. Just out of curiosity, how do 18 wheelers fit into the FedEX UPS game plan? (I think all of us understand the purpose of the cargo vans, but based on your comments, one would think the cargo vans could bring parcels directly to facilities that are tied to rail yards.)
VAN: St. Cloud to Minneapolis 18-WHEELER: Minneapolis to Chicago (CACH) TRAIN (ZWSPRIC): Chicago to Richmond, CA (Bay Area) 18-WHEELER: Richmond to Sacramento VAN: Sacramento to your recipient If you were shipping from St. Cloud to Lincoln, NE, you may see something more like this: VAN: St. Cloud to Minneapolis 18-WHEELER: Minneapolis to Omaha 18-WHEELER: Omaha to Lincoln VAN: Lincoln to recipient If there were enough traffic between Minneapolis and Lincoln, you might even see an 18-wheeler go directly between the two, skipping Omaha.
Originally Posted by beckoa
(Post 14297111)
I was always amused when I saw some brand new 737 fuselages outside of Frys Electronics in SEA a few years ago... they had to ride the rail before they graced the sky. :cool:
In Alaska we get the bulk of our goods by ship 3x a week and from there some is distributed by the Alaska Railroad to FAI... The AKRR also transports quite a bit of raw materials including coal and fuel. Most of ANC's Jet-A came from a refinery near FAI (and I think still does). |
Originally Posted by DJ Bitterbarn
(Post 14290488)
..... it's amazing how when you get just off that road the whole landscape changes..
I do recall my buddies & I hopping into an open freight railcar of a train that was stopped near our regular crossing. We thought we'd ride it for a bit when the train started up, then hop off before it got going too fast. Too bad for us that this was a short train and got up to speed very quickly. Thankfully it had to stop for something else about 20 miles away and VERY thankfully there was a parent willing to come pick us up. WHEW:) |
Originally Posted by jackal
(Post 14297368)
From PDX? Most likely SEA, OAK, LAX, or ORD. ...
|
Originally Posted by jackal
(Post 14297368)
Only thing I'd mention about the above is that, unless contracts have been renegotiated in the last year (I haven't paid attention since then), UPS uses rail transport heavily while FedEx chooses to use team-driven trucks. It's the rare case, if ever, when FedEx goods travel by rail. UPS, in contrast, is one of the largest customers of the rail industry. Ultra-high-priority trains like the ZLACWSP ("hot," high-priority Z train from Los Angeles, California to Willow SPrings, IL, near UPS's giant CACH (Chicago Area Consolidated Hub) on the historic and important AT&SF Transcon route paralleling I-40 and the reverse ZWSPLAC) are virtually dedicated to UPS's important ground operation and are scheduled precisely to depart from and arrive at the given sorting hubs just in time for their respective sort operations. Check out this thread for some potentially interesting info from the train nuts over at TrainOrders:
http://www.trainorders.com/discussion/read.php?1,185021 According to a UPS official, UPS will try to move goods moving more than 700 miles away by rail. Shorter movements are generally better done by truck. More cool info about how UPS works with CACH here: http://www.trains.com/trn/default.aspx?c=a&id=549 And an interesting article about the modern state of intermodal freight transport: http://www.worldtrademag.com/Article...00000000726114 For anyone that is curious as they are passing by UPS semi, you can tell the difference between a rail trailer and road trailer. The rail trailer has a flat bottom while the road trailer has a pit in it. The road trailers were far easier to load as they have rollers built in and don't require a step stool to load all the way the ceiling, unlike rail trailers. UPS was big on promoting from within and one the things they always benefits brought up about driving the 18 wheelers for them was that the driver never overnighted anywhere. Always out and back on the same shift. Hence the reason why you rarely see a UPS semi with a sleeper cab, where as a lot of Fedex Ground semis do. Without there heavy use rails they probably wouldn't be able to effectively offer this benefit. |
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 14298311)
Need a handkerchief for that foam coming off your mouth?? ;) :p
|
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 14298311)
Need a handkerchief for that foam coming off your mouth?? ;) :p
|
Originally Posted by beckoa
(Post 14331377)
He tends to do that around trains ;)
I'm quite normal in comparison to some of the people out there who do silly things like pay for a Trainorders.com membership. Me? I just like to ride 'em... ;) |
Originally Posted by jackal
(Post 14331409)
:rolleyes:
I'm quite normal in comparison to some of the people out there who do silly things like pay for a Trainorders.com membership. Me? I just like to ride 'em... ;) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:49 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.