![]() |
Google as Document backup
I have a number of files (100mg or so) that I keep on file server - mostly documents, copies of fiancial records, etc. As hard drives are suspectable to backup, I was thinking of backing these online.
Can I just use Google Documents to back up the documents - I only have about 200, and they are all either Word, Excel, PDF, or JPG. |
Gone.
|
I use google docs for short-term backups and use Mozy.com for longer term backups. I don't put personal financial info out of google docs and it's encrypted on my hard drive.
|
mozy.com is supposed to be good. unlimited for $5 or something ridiculously cheap like that.
|
Do you really want to store financial records on a server that you don't control? For just 100 MB of data, I'd burn a CD and store it in a safe place.
Isn't your file server backed up regularly? |
Store them in a Truecrypt file and sync them with your off-site backup service of choice. I prefer Sugarsync, but you can pick from 100's of options.
|
I've been using Dropbox and have been fairly happy with it. It's in an invitation-only beta (or was the last I looked)--if you'd like an invite, PM me, I have 10 left, I think.
|
For that amount I would just burn them to CD on a regular basis.
|
Originally Posted by BNA_flyer
(Post 9995403)
I've been using Dropbox and have been fairly happy with it. It's in an invitation-only beta (or was the last I looked)--
http://www.getdropbox.com/#signup |
Originally Posted by chrisi1024
(Post 9994486)
Do you really want to store financial records on a server that you don't control? For just 100 MB of data, I'd burn a CD and store it in a safe place.
Isn't your file server backed up regularly? mozy.com is supposed to be good. unlimited for $5 or something ridiculously cheap like that. |
Originally Posted by pred02
(Post 9996144)
Yes - RAID1.
It helps protect against a drive failure but will not protect against write errors on the drive or catastrophic failure of a system. I've experienced lost data on RAID1 and RAID5 volumes. Backup onto a different volume/media is critcal if you really want to protect your data. |
[QUOTE=pred02;9996144]Yes - RAID1.[QUOTE]
In that case the answer is "No." |
Originally Posted by lin821
(Post 9995870)
|
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 9996279)
RAID != backup.
It helps protect against a drive failure but will not protect against write errors on the drive or catastrophic failure of a system. I've experienced lost data on RAID1 and RAID5 volumes. Backup onto a different volume/media is critcal if you really want to protect your data. |
Originally Posted by pred02
(Post 9999149)
I run Acronis every night from Workstations to the File server. The file server is RAID1.
On another, I backup a pair of SATA RAID 0 drives to a huge internal EIDE using an oldie that I love - Powerquest Drive Image 7. Symantec bought this and subsequently killed it as it competed with their Ghost product, a real shame as it was very much superior for backing up drives (though I still use Ghost to clone small drives to larger ones). |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:39 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.