FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Travel Technology (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travel-technology-169/)
-   -   GPS during flight. A question... (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travel-technology/840979-gps-during-flight-question.html)

Steph3n Jul 20, 2008 2:45 pm

Just FYI the person with the iphone 3g question, no there is no real GPS in the iphone 3g, just access to the AGPS tower based triangulation.

you don't get a real satlock so you can't use it inflight, as it won't have any GPS means in airplane mode.

redshift27 Jul 20, 2008 2:53 pm


Originally Posted by Steph3n (Post 10064411)
Just FYI the person with the iphone 3g question, no there is no real GPS in the iphone 3g, just access to the AGPS tower based triangulation.

you don't get a real satlock so you can't use it inflight, as it won't have any GPS means in airplane mode.

Just plain wrong: iPhone 3G has a real GPS.

Quokka Jul 20, 2008 3:28 pm


Originally Posted by college_is_expensive (Post 10058535)
This past Feb/March, I was flying DL from ATL to DXB. [...] I basically gave up because the inflight entertainment on our Boeing 777 had a map of our location with airspeed, head/tail wind speed, altitude, ATL time, DXB time, and a few other things. [...] Pretty cool from 55,000ft.

No. What would be pretty cool is if you were actually on a DL 777 at 55,000 ft. :rolleyes:

ScottC Jul 20, 2008 3:37 pm


Originally Posted by Steph3n (Post 10064411)
Just FYI the person with the iphone 3g question, no there is no real GPS in the iphone 3g, just access to the AGPS tower based triangulation.

you don't get a real satlock so you can't use it inflight, as it won't have any GPS means in airplane mode.

Not correct :)

Read this article on aGPS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-GPS

Essentially, it's REAL GPS but with extra assistance from other sources. The phone can contact a server and get updated location tables of where satellites should be, which greatly increases the fix speed. In airplane mode, it loses the A portion, unless it has an up to date location table loaded.

alanh Jul 20, 2008 8:35 pm

Gpsinformation.net keeps a list of airlines that allow and disallow consumer GPS units.

Steph3n Jul 20, 2008 9:26 pm


Originally Posted by ScottC (Post 10064577)
Not correct :)

Read this article on aGPS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-GPS

Essentially, it's REAL GPS but with extra assistance from other sources. The phone can contact a server and get updated location tables of where satellites should be, which greatly increases the fix speed. In airplane mode, it loses the A portion, unless it has an up to date location table loaded.

ok interesting, I used to sale cell phones, and the GPS at that time was not accurate and called AGPS as well, I got stuck in old terminology I guess :D
This is more what it was: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiolocation

redshift27 Jul 21, 2008 12:35 am

1st generation iPhone did not have GPS (or AGPS), it used radiolocation as per your link. iPhone 3G has GPS and AGPS.

threeatms Jul 22, 2008 12:05 am

When GPS first came out I used my Garmin iQue all the time without any hassle or 'interference'. In fact, many FA's thought it was nice to see where we were and our ETA.

I always liked looking at our speed since 500mph isn't so common in my car:D

dgwright99 Jul 22, 2008 12:25 am


Originally Posted by CessnaJock (Post 9978332)
A controversy over this flared up a few months ago. A few "belt-and-suspenders" personalities suggested that the interference with flight systems was a finite possibility, but they were effectively shouted down by the "you don't know what you're talking about - the hell with safety concerns" types.

Those "belt and suspenders" people are, at least in theory, correct (I speak as someone with significant RF/Wireless EMI expertise and 20+ years experience). Some such receivers do have a habit of radiating on frequencies of concern, and given just how weak GPS signals are, such concerns should not be dismissed out of hand. There are well documented cases of certain XM receivers interfering with GPS for similar reasons.

The chances of this cauisng interference with the AC main GPS are low, but should not be dismissed out of hand.


Originally Posted by bocastephen (Post 10056073)
Nonsense. A device which only *receives* a signal is not a threat to any avionics system - it is receiving a signal which is already present. TVs, radios, GPS, etc., all fall into that category - although all airlines ban TVs, radios, etc.

This is a common misconception; as noted above, depending on the receiver architecture, unintentional radiation on the LO, IF, etc frequencies is a potential threat to other receivers, though with modern receiver architectures much less so than in the past. It would be better if you left such aparently definitive statements to those fully qualified to make them.

jackal Aug 22, 2008 12:27 am


Originally Posted by ScottC (Post 10064577)
Not correct :)

Read this article on aGPS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-GPS

Essentially, it's REAL GPS but with extra assistance from other sources. The phone can contact a server and get updated location tables of where satellites should be, which greatly increases the fix speed. In airplane mode, it loses the A portion, unless it has an up to date location table loaded.

According to the article you linked above, some devices require the "A" portion of A-GPS and others don't:


Some A-GPS solutions require an active connection to a cell phone (or other data) network to function, in others it simply makes positioning faster and more accurate, but is not required.

As an additional benefit, it can reduce both the amount of CPU and programming required for a GPS Phone by offloading most of the work onto the assistance server.
It appears that the iPhone requires the "A" portion in order to secure the satellite lock and do the necessary calculations--so either the iPhone does not have the location tables loaded locally (as ScottC said) or Apple chose to have the Assistance Server do most of the calculations required instead of the local processor (which, since the iPhone contains a 400-MHz processor, I don't quite understand--maybe it's for power saving). In any case, I [surreptitiously] tried the iPhone on a couple of flights last week (on a carrier that specifically prohibits them...which shall remain nameless ;)), and it was unable to secure a satellite lock either in the Maps app or the Here I Am app (which surprised me, as I thought more GPS satellites would be visible to the device from 36,000 feet). Now I understand why. Still seems strange...

(FWIW, I tried it with airplane mode both on and off, just in case airplane mode shuts the GPS receiver down. Not sure if it does or if the Location Services switch operates separately from the airplane mode switch...)

pdxer Aug 23, 2008 7:18 am


Originally Posted by jackal (Post 10241787)
According to the article you linked above, some devices require the "A" portion of A-GPS and others don't:

and the iphone is among the ones that don't.


It appears that the iPhone requires the "A" portion in order to secure the satellite lock and do the necessary calculations--so either the iPhone does not have the location tables loaded locally (as ScottC said) or Apple chose to have the Assistance Server do most of the calculations required instead of the local processor (which, since the iPhone contains a 400-MHz processor, I don't quite understand--maybe it's for power saving). In any case, I [surreptitiously] tried the iPhone on a couple of flights last week (on a carrier that specifically prohibits them...which shall remain nameless ;)), and it was unable to secure a satellite lock either in the Maps app or the Here I Am app (which surprised me, as I thought more GPS satellites would be visible to the device from 36,000 feet). Now I understand why. Still seems strange...

(FWIW, I tried it with airplane mode both on and off, just in case airplane mode shuts the GPS receiver down. Not sure if it does or if the Location Services switch operates separately from the airplane mode switch...)
getting a gps fix in a plane is not that easy, even with a dedicated gps unit. the gps in the iphone is not as sensitive as say, a garmin 60csx with a sirfstar iii chip. if you weren't holding the iphone up to the window, it's not at all surprising that it didn't get a fix, and even then, i suspect it won't work that well.

jackal Aug 23, 2008 7:26 am


Originally Posted by pdxer (Post 10247759)
getting a gps fix in a plane is not that easy, even with a dedicated gps unit. the gps in the iphone is not as sensitive as say, a garmin 60csx with a sirfstar iii chip. if you weren't holding the iphone up to the window, it's not at all surprising that it didn't get a fix, and even then, i suspect it won't work that well.

Actually, I did hold it up to the window for a good three or four minutes during a couple of my tests, and still nothing.

holeinone Aug 24, 2008 6:42 am


Originally Posted by Quokka (Post 10064546)
No. What would be pretty cool is if you were actually on a DL 777 at 55,000 ft. :rolleyes:

It's the new DL777-SR71 :)

MG-PDX Aug 24, 2008 7:26 am

Airlines which OFFICIALLY APPROVE the use of GPS receivers during CRUISE
 
Found this online and thought I'd post it.

http://gpsinformation.net/airgps/airgps.htm

Thanks for the FOM reference. I may have to play with this on my next flight....


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:54 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.