FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Travel Technology (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travel-technology-169/)
-   -   Do laptops with 8gb of RAM exist? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travel-technology/838010-do-laptops-8gb-ram-exist.html)

yevlesh2 Jun 24, 2008 9:57 am

Do laptops with 8gb of RAM exist?
 
Do any of the major manufacturers make laptops with over 4 gb of RAM? Preferably ones which are still laptops, not 12 pound monstrosities .

Looks like the new Dell Latitude E series will have more RAM, but it doesn't look like there is a definite release date for it :(

Dodge DeBoulet Jun 24, 2008 10:55 am

My understanding is that newer Core 2 Duo laptops with the Santa Rosa chipset can support more than 4GB of RAM; the problem is currently the availability of SODIMMS larger the 2GB.

If you intend to run Windows, it will need to be a 64bit version to take advantage of more than 3.25GB of memory. And the 64bit version of Vista is a mess from what I hear.

yevlesh2 Jun 24, 2008 11:08 am

Yeah, I was thinking of using the 64-bit version of Vista. I guess 64-bit XP would be a better option then.


Originally Posted by PorkRind (Post 9930563)
My understanding is that newer Core 2 Duo laptops with the Santa Rosa chipset can support more than 4GB of RAM; the problem is currently the availability of SODIMMS larger the 2GB.

If you intend to run Windows, it will need to be a 64bit version to take advantage of more than 3.25GB of memory. And the 64bit version of Vista is a mess from what I hear.


msb0b Jun 24, 2008 11:15 am

The part certainly exists. This is a single 4GB module, when installed in pairs, will give the system 8 GB. The cost is still too prohibitive for the mass market still. Right now the aftermarket is the only option for this upgrade.

Someone installed these modules in a T61p and wrote about it.

bdjohns1 Jun 24, 2008 12:33 pm


Originally Posted by PorkRind (Post 9930563)
If you intend to run Windows, it will need to be a 64bit version to take advantage of more than 3.25GB of memory. And the 64bit version of Vista is a mess from what I hear.

I ran Vista32 for a year on my desktop before I went to x64. It's no different in terms of stability for me.

JadedTraveler Jun 24, 2008 1:54 pm

Related question came up recently. You can always put it as much memory as you want, but the laptop chipset and the OS variant must both support the 8Gb to utilize all of it. Adding memory to laptop.

Loren Pechtel Jun 24, 2008 2:17 pm


Originally Posted by JadedTraveler (Post 9931599)
Related question came up recently. You can always put it as much memory as you want, but the laptop chipset and the OS variant must both support the 8Gb to utilize all of it. Adding memory to laptop.

There are physical limits on what you can install. Most laptops have two sockets.

Dodge DeBoulet Jun 24, 2008 2:35 pm


Originally Posted by bdjohns1 (Post 9931133)
I ran Vista32 for a year on my desktop before I went to x64. It's no different in terms of stability for me.

I'm going by what I've read over at the ThinkPad forums. One of the admins there had plenty to say about Vista64. It's about 3 posts down, and at least one other poster agreed with him :)

sbm12 Jun 24, 2008 2:44 pm

Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8830/4.2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)


Originally Posted by PorkRind

Originally Posted by bdjohns1 (Post 9931133)
I ran Vista32 for a year on my desktop before I went to x64. It's no different in terms of stability for me.

I'm going by what I've read over at the ThinkPad forums. One of the admins there had plenty to say about Vista64. It's about 3 posts down, and at least one other poster agreed with him :)

The guy's comments are not specific to x64, they are specific to Vista. Putting aside some of the vitriol in that post, there are problems with explorer and a few other things in Vista. Some hotfixes and SP1 supposedly addressed some of that, but it still isn't perfect by any sense.

So if you don't want to run Vista you can run XP x64 instead and you'll get access to all the RAM.

Vista x64 really isn't any worse than Vista x32. There will still be driver issues and similar issues to overcome, but otherwise Vista is just Vista, x86 or x64.

JadedTraveler Jun 24, 2008 3:27 pm


Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel (Post 9931733)
There are physical limits on what you can install. Most laptops have two sockets.

Once again, I'd say go here for the final word. Note the Mobile 945GMS Chipset.

Dodge DeBoulet Jun 24, 2008 5:34 pm


Originally Posted by sbm12 (Post 9931899)
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8830/4.2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)



The guy's comments are not specific to x64, they are specific to Vista. Putting aside some of the vitriol in that post, there are problems with explorer and a few other things in Vista. Some hotfixes and SP1 supposedly addressed some of that, but it still isn't perfect by any sense.

So if you don't want to run Vista you can run XP x64 instead and you'll get access to all the RAM.

Vista x64 really isn't any worse than Vista x32. There will still be driver issues and similar issues to overcome, but otherwise Vista is just Vista, x86 or x64.

The guy did state Vista x64 specifically. Of course, if his comments are relevant to all versions of Vista, I'm sure glad I stuck with XP :D

Loren Pechtel Jun 24, 2008 8:46 pm


Originally Posted by JadedTraveler (Post 9932119)
Once again, I'd say go here for the final word. Note the Mobile 945GMS Chipset.

None of those support more than 2 chips.

lensman Jun 24, 2008 10:20 pm

I run XP, XP x64, and Vista x64. My wife runs XP and Vista.

I've noticed no difference between Vista and Vista x64, but XP x64 is definitely more troublesome than XP - though this has gotten better since the advent of Vista x64.

At any rate, I would not recommend XP x64.

Finally, for a notebook, I'd think carefully before installing a non-OEM OS on it. Make sure all drivers you'll need are available for the OS you select.

chrisi1024 Jun 25, 2008 12:18 pm

I think the only game in town right now is the Dell Precision M6300. It's an 8.5 pound laptop which can be configured with 8GB of RAM when ordered with a 64-bit operating system.

Upgrading to 8GB of RAM will set you back over $1000.

JadedTraveler Jun 25, 2008 2:54 pm


Originally Posted by lensman (Post 9933891)
Finally, for a notebook, I'd think carefully before installing a non-OEM OS on it. Make sure all drivers you'll need are available for the OS you select.

A good point. Other than the Dell mentioned, vendors will tell you "not supported" if you ask about it.

A workaround is to install VMWare, or VPC or VS, then install a server or 64 Bit OS on the virtual machine.

The original post said "ones which are still laptops...not 12 pound monstrosities . ". I would draw the line on laptops with mobile chipsets for this, as opposed to laptops with desktop chipsets.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.