![]() |
Put windows server on it. It can handle multiple connections.
|
Originally Posted by thegeneral
Put windows server on it. It can handle multiple connections.
|
Just OK
Here's an update: Using TightVNC Server and View works great at letting multiple people connect to one computer, all at the same time.
However, my colleagues (on a LAN) are complaining that it doesn't refresh enough. They will use a program (like Excel even) and scroll around or make changes, and not see it on the screen. Sometimes they'll open up a program and just see the outline of the window, but none of the content. As a result, they end up just logging in with GoToMyPC or LogMeIn, which both work great but only one person can use at a time. Anyone have a solution to this? Is there a better viewer? Or a different flavor of VNC that will allow multiple simultaneous connections? |
This likely occurs because the VNC server doesn't notice all the changes to the server's desktop. You might try changing the "capture method" in the VNC server settings to poll for changes rather than using hooks, if such an option is available. It is available in RealVNC; don't know about TightVNC but it's worth a look.
|
Windows Remote Desktop
Originally Posted by Capite
(Post 7430370)
...Anyone have a solution to this? Is there a better viewer? Or a different flavor of VNC that will allow multiple simultaneous connections?
http://sig9.com/articles/concurrent-remote-desktop Possible to view/control remote computer as well as share files and sound. Excellent solution without additional software. I find it much quicker than VNC. |
@ ttjoseph: hmm... no "capture settings" anywhere I can find on TightVNC. Maybe I'll find a different viewer.
@ driftings: WinXP simultaneous users on Remote Desktop is interesting; unfortunately I checked out the link and each connection must be logged in under a different Windows account - we are trying to be logged in and seeing the same thing on the screen. |
For remote application use, UltraVNC is much better than TightVNC. It does a much better job of seeing screen updates, since it actually uses a video driver to watch the screen.
|
Originally Posted by murphy
(Post 7462777)
For remote application use, UltraVNC is much better than TightVNC. It does a much better job of seeing screen updates, since it actually uses a video driver to watch the screen.
|
Originally Posted by Capite
(Post 7466687)
Thanks for that. I am testing out UltraVNC now. Do I have to enable some setting or plugin or something to use the video driver you talk about? Is it the "optional Mirror Driver"?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:02 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.