FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Travel Technology (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travel-technology-169/)
-   -   CD ripping (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travel-technology/455397-cd-ripping.html)

windwalker Jul 22, 2005 7:56 pm

CD ripping
 
Just curious
What bit rate do most rip at for wma?
96, 128, other....

winkydink Jul 22, 2005 8:46 pm


Originally Posted by windwalker
Just curious
What bit rate do most rip at?

For mp3s, I usually choose the highest Variable Bit Rate setting.

shuuy Jul 22, 2005 9:28 pm

Why VBR?

skofarrell Jul 22, 2005 10:16 pm

320k for MP3
256k for WMA

All new stuff is ripped WMA.

I've picked higher rates so that some point X years from now, when all home stereo equipment is wireless, I don't have to worry about re-ripping my old stuff. The high quality file will sound great on my 19.1 hifi.

Having said that, I'm sure that X years from now, all content will be readily available on-line and on-demand, and I'll have needlessly filled up my disks with bloated bitrate files.

I'm also sure that X years form now, my hearing will have deteriorated so much, that a 64k bit rate would be fine.

I'm also sure that X years from now, Microsoft will have abandoned the WMA format for something more proprietary.

But for now I'm content with my far sightedness. :)

RLG Jul 25, 2005 7:48 pm

I store the original wav files using lossless compression (.ape or .flac) was well as encode using vbr. that way if i decide to use a different format or higher quality settings, i can easily re-encode my collection without manually inserting and removing the cd's again. unfortunately, this does use quite a bit of disk space.

MBM3 Jul 25, 2005 8:15 pm

I rip at the max in WMA.

skofarrell Jul 25, 2005 8:38 pm


Originally Posted by RLG
I store the original wav files using lossless compression (.ape or .flac) was well as encode using vbr. that way if i decide to use a different format or higher quality settings, i can easily re-encode my collection without manually inserting and removing the cd's again. unfortunately, this does use quite a bit of disk space.

No kidding! Are you looking at 400-500mb per CD?

RLG Jul 25, 2005 10:24 pm


Originally Posted by skofarrell
No kidding! Are you looking at 400-500mb per CD?

No. Usually a CD can be compressed about 50%, so it's more in the 200-300mb range. Disk drives are cheap nowadays.

winkydink Jul 26, 2005 10:21 am


Originally Posted by YYCOllie
Why VBR?

It's usually the best compromise between quality and compression.

skofarrell Jul 26, 2005 11:39 am


Originally Posted by RLG
No. Usually a CD can be compressed about 50%, so it's more in the 200-300mb range. Disk drives are cheap nowadays.

Do you rip it twice, or do you use a flac > something playable converter?

RLG Jul 26, 2005 10:46 pm

I rip it to a .wav file using a program called "exact audio copy".

then i compress it using "monkey's audio" to a .ape file.

i run "lame" to convert the .wav file into an mp3.

then i delete the .wav files.

producing the .ape and .mp3 files is very processor intensive, so i usually run those steps overnight.

LIH Prem Jul 27, 2005 2:18 am

I too rip everything to lossless flac files, and encode to mp3 at whatever bit rate I want, as needed. (or whatever format I need).

Disk space is very cheap these days.

-David

LIH Prem Jul 27, 2005 2:24 am


Originally Posted by skofarrell
Do you rip it twice, or do you use a flac > something playable converter?

There are various programs that support flac decoding. I use cdex with flac as an external encoder/decoder. cdex is very powerful, so you effectively get to skip a step as in RLG's method (but really, under the hood, the same is happening .. it reads the file in as a wav file and passes it to your external encoder using the command line options you specify, it's just easier this way since it's all done in a single "job".)

You can get flac plugins for winamp and other players, so you can play them natively using your favorite player.

Then I use dbpowereamp for converting from flac to anything else. dbpoweramp is a very handy program.

-David

skofarrell Jul 27, 2005 6:16 am


Originally Posted by RLG
I rip it to a .wav file using a program called "exact audio copy".

then i compress it using "monkey's audio" to a .ape file.

i run "lame" to convert the .wav file into an mp3.

then i delete the .wav files.

producing the .ape and .mp3 files is very processor intensive, so i usually run those steps overnight.

You may want to look at Easy CD-DA extractor.. It will rip directly to .flac or .ape. It will also convert form one format to another...

RLG Jul 27, 2005 2:47 pm


Originally Posted by skofarrell
You may want to look at Easy CD-DA extractor.. It will rip directly to .flac or .ape. It will also convert form one format to another...

EAC can do that as well.

I don't use that feature because it slows down the ripping process while it does the computation intensive compression. I prefer to have it do the part which requires manual intervention (inserting & removing CD's) quickly, then run the other part overnite when I'm sleeping.

I also use dbpoweramp for converting between formats. It's a great program.

LIH Prem Jul 27, 2005 3:48 pm

Personally, I can't fathom why anybody would choose wma as their native format, but to each their own, I guess. That's why we have choices. :)

-David

RLG Jul 27, 2005 5:29 pm


Originally Posted by LIH Prem
Personally, I can't fathom why anybody would choose wma as their native format, but to each their own, I guess. That's why we have choices. :)

-David

I vaguely recall that if you're going to extremely compress the files (i.e. very low bitrates), wma gives better quality for the same size than mp3. since i'm using a high bitrate, mp3 is better.

richarddd Jul 27, 2005 7:56 pm

http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/ is the FT of these types of audio issues.

skofarrell Jul 27, 2005 8:08 pm


Originally Posted by LIH Prem
Personally, I can't fathom why anybody would choose wma as their native format, but to each their own, I guess. That's why we have choices. :)

-David

Its higher quality at a lower bitrate than than mp3 and compatible with my player.

GregLeg Jul 27, 2005 9:50 pm


Originally Posted by RLG
I don't use that feature because it slows down the ripping process while it does the computation intensive compression. I prefer to have it do the part which requires manual intervention (inserting & removing CD's) quickly, then run the other part overnite when I'm sleeping.

I do exactly the same thing. Take a stack of CDs, copy them to WAV with EAC (which also does lots of error correction and the like in case a CD happens to have a scratch, as some of my 16 year old CDs now unfortunatley do), and then run a batch file to bulk encode them overnight.

Coathanger Aug 5, 2005 12:43 am

Am I the only one that uses Apple's Lossless codec? It does a pretty good job of sound preservation, though 40MB for a 3 min track is abit heavy on the memory.

I especially use Lossless for instrumental CD's.

UAVirgin Aug 5, 2005 7:22 am

My DAP directly supports FLAC so I RIP CD's directly to FLAC using jetAudio and then drag an drop them to the DAP.

pbjag Aug 13, 2005 7:05 pm

I just discovered a service that I wish I had known about sooner.

www.awaken.com will rip your CDs for you in your choice of several formats and bit rates and send them back to you with all your CDS in the chosen format organized on DVD. During the process, they'll repair scratches and organize by Artist, Title and genre

For a slightly higher fee, they'll also organize your CDs and cover art in a binder.

What a great idea! I still have about 150 CDs I haven't gotten around to ripping, so they are going off to them next week.

Fraser Aug 14, 2005 7:40 am

128kb.

Seems best compromise although with CDs being so cheap I should do it much higher :o


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:51 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.