Are we All Suckers for Using Expensive Phones When a Cheap $40 Will Work Fine?
#31
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: AA, DL, Avis, Enterprise, National, IHG, HH, SPG/MR
Posts: 1,852
Why are larger phones obnoxious? I can't read well without reading glasses. A larger phone (I just got a Note 8) lets me send and receive texts, read emails, write notes, check my calendar, and a whole range of other things without having to fumble for glasses.
The Note 8 is, technically, a "phablet," a cross between a phone and a tablet and has the features of both. I certainly don't think it's obnoxious.
The Note 8 is, technically, a "phablet," a cross between a phone and a tablet and has the features of both. I certainly don't think it's obnoxious.
They take up way too much space, barely fit in a pocket and when they do, it doesn't leave space for anything else. It's difficult to use one handed because one key ends up being half a football field away from a key on the otherside of the keyboard. Just a complete mess.
I get why they do it. People want larger screens for media consumption.
Me? I'll use my laptop with a much nicer and larger display for movies and my phone for communicating, thanks.
#32
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Exclusively OMNI/PR, for Reasons
Posts: 4,188
It's difficult to use one handed because one key ends up being half a football field away from a key on the otherside of the keyboard. Just a complete mess.
I get why they do it. People want larger screens for media consumption.
Me? I'll use my laptop with a much nicer and larger display for movies and my phone for communicating, thanks.
Me? I'll use my laptop with a much nicer and larger display for movies and my phone for communicating, thanks.
#33
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,277
Besides better cameras, one of the biggest differences with flagship phones is performance. They're MUCH faster, with every new model that comes out. All the time waiting for apps to load or web pages to render adds up. Does it add up enough that spending $800-$1000 vs. $40 is worth it? That's up to you to decide for yourself. But it can be very significant.
I'm still on an "old" Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge. I kinda want the Note 8 (it's actually not that much bigger than my S6!) but mine still performs well enough that I haven't found the need, yet.
I'm still on an "old" Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge. I kinda want the Note 8 (it's actually not that much bigger than my S6!) but mine still performs well enough that I haven't found the need, yet.
#34
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,555
And once a new round of phones are out, developers start taking advantage of the latest performance. New apps often don't run as well on older phones.
My own personal sweet spot has settled on "last year's flagship". My current device is a GS7, a bought in fall 2016 when various promos dropped it down into the $300 range.
I went through a phase where I was experimenting with midrange-to-cheap phones. Bought my daughter and mom Moto G4's, and we had nothing but problems with them. They simply couldn't run a variety of different applications, even when they were brand new. Plus the camera performed poorly, which is one of the must-haves on any smartphone. My daughter has decided to go the iPhone route (kids these days... ), but she actually wanted the small phone so we got her a $75 iPhone 5 and she's been happy ever since. When it dies, we'll bump her up to the 6...
#36
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,555
Yes, approximately this:
https://swappa.com/listing/MWL772/view
Had a few minor nicks on the back and corners but a good screen and no functional issues. Bought it about 5 months ago. It is still working well.
https://swappa.com/listing/MWL772/view
Had a few minor nicks on the back and corners but a good screen and no functional issues. Bought it about 5 months ago. It is still working well.
#37
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: 42.1% in PDX , 49.9% in PVG & 8% in the air somewhere
Programs: Marriott Ambassador Elite, UA 1K, AS MVP GLD 75K, DL Pt
Posts: 1,086
I've been a Nexus/Pixel user.
I just sold my Pixel, and started using a $40 phone for a while (at least until the new Pixel comes out.) I bought this prepaid Verizon E4:
https://www.walmart.com/ip/Verizon-M...paid/953073971
No Walmart near me, so I price-matched the $40 price at Target. Once I got the phone, I paid $2 for an unlock code on Ebay, and popped in my T-mobile postpaid SIM.
OK, the camera doesn't hold a candle to a flagship phone. But, it has 16 GB built in memory, space for an SD card, and a battery that pops out. And, the screen is not as good as a flagship, but very nice and readable. Videos are very watachable. There was some Verizon crapware but I disabled those apps in settings and they are no longer visible.
I don't need a case - if I drop it and break the screen, I can get a new phone for $40, less than the deductible for Applecare.
I may well buy another flagship for the camera. But, an Iphone certainly does not have 17.5 times the functionality of this phone, but it does cost 17.5 times as much for the base model.
I just sold my Pixel, and started using a $40 phone for a while (at least until the new Pixel comes out.) I bought this prepaid Verizon E4:
https://www.walmart.com/ip/Verizon-M...paid/953073971
No Walmart near me, so I price-matched the $40 price at Target. Once I got the phone, I paid $2 for an unlock code on Ebay, and popped in my T-mobile postpaid SIM.
OK, the camera doesn't hold a candle to a flagship phone. But, it has 16 GB built in memory, space for an SD card, and a battery that pops out. And, the screen is not as good as a flagship, but very nice and readable. Videos are very watachable. There was some Verizon crapware but I disabled those apps in settings and they are no longer visible.
I don't need a case - if I drop it and break the screen, I can get a new phone for $40, less than the deductible for Applecare.
I may well buy another flagship for the camera. But, an Iphone certainly does not have 17.5 times the functionality of this phone, but it does cost 17.5 times as much for the base model.
ONe can make that argument about car, house/neighborhood, flying economy or business, Motel 6 or St Regis etc. etc.
For the record I have two iPhones a 7Plus and a 6Plus and will likely upgrade my family to iPhoneX but my last four car purchases have been 3 years + used and I shoot a D5/D810 ( oh, both bought used too )
#38
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
It's difficult to use one handed because one key ends up being half a football field away from a key on the otherside of the keyboard. Just a complete mess.
I get why they do it. People want larger screens for media consumption.
[/quote]Me? I'll use my laptop with a much nicer and larger display for movies and my phone for communicating, thanks.[/QUOTE]My Note 8 makes a very serviceable computer with the Dex doc, a USB monitor, and a bluetooth mouse and keyboard.
#39
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,781
Why are larger phones obnoxious? I can't read well without reading glasses. A larger phone (I just got a Note 8) lets me send and receive texts, read emails, write notes, check my calendar, and a whole range of other things without having to fumble for glasses.
The Note 8 is, technically, a "phablet," a cross between a phone and a tablet and has the features of both. I certainly don't think it's obnoxious.
The Note 8 is, technically, a "phablet," a cross between a phone and a tablet and has the features of both. I certainly don't think it's obnoxious.
I'm lucky enough not to have vision problems with smaller (ish) phones although having had 2.8" and 3.5" screens far enough back I'm glad that's inconceivably small now... I can't thumb type on smaller phones and even the difference between 5.7" to 5.9" is enough to help with my lack of dexterity.
For that matter, LTE is the same on both, just different bands. Having bands for all of them is probably less common than having CDMA + GSM/HSPA for the 3G/2G fallback, and there are still a decent number of phone with enough bands to be usable.
I've had exactly the opposite experience. I've been using PCs since 1982. I don't want to get into the whole Mac vs. PC thing, so I'll just say that the few times I've had to work with Macs, I found them extremely frustrating because the kinds of things that I routinely do on PC couldn't be done on Mac because the OS hid so many functions from the user.
For that matter, having had to go back to Windows 3.x briefly for something recently (converting some really old documents in multiple steps) I realized just how little modern Windows has in common with the pre-Win95 GUI.
They take up way too much space, barely fit in a pocket and when they do, it doesn't leave space for anything else. It's difficult to use one handed because one key ends up being half a football field away from a key on the otherside of the keyboard. Just a complete mess.
And, as I said, it just depends on your pockets. Too big would be too big to hold one handed to read, which my 8" tablet kind of was but was just manageable, and too wide to read as a single column of text which my 8" tablet wasn't. So I'd totally just take one of those (especially a newer/lighter one than my now rather dated Tab3 8") with a proper phone/LTE modem in it... compared to that, my 6" phone is quite small.
#40
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SEA or BGR, Lower Earth Orbit
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 17,217
I've used some cheap phones before. You definitely get what you pay for. They're good for basic things, but they're overall pretty much crap.
The bigger "suckers" would be upgrading to the newest flagship every year.
The bigger "suckers" would be upgrading to the newest flagship every year.
#41
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: AA, DL, Avis, Enterprise, National, IHG, HH, SPG/MR
Posts: 1,852
#42
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,781
Because of the declining size of bezels, old 5" screen phones can easily be as big as 5.5" phones today, and the 6" phones I've owned (Nexus 6 and Huawei Mate 9 -- actually 5.9" but close enough) are both not effectively larger in footprint than Apple's first big screen phone (6 Plus, 5.5")
It looks like the 8 Plus is still rather porky relative to its screen size:
Huawei Mate 9 (5.9" 16:9 1920x1080) : 156.9 x 78.9 x 7.9 mm (6.18 x 3.11 x 0.31 in)
iPhone 8 Plus (5.5" 16:9 1920x1080) : 6.24 inches (158.4 mm) x 3.07 inches (78.1 mm) x 0.30 inch (7.5 mm)
Galaxy S8+ (6.2" 18.5:9 2960x1440) 159.5 x 73.4 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.32 in)
The running trend with the newest phones is narrower and longer (2:1 or even 21:9, vs. the older 16:9 or even 16:10 or 4:3 on old enough phones... at the same time many Android tables have gone back to the 4:3 which iPad never left)... which isn't super for me but seems popular with a lot of people.
It looks like the 8 Plus is still rather porky relative to its screen size:
Huawei Mate 9 (5.9" 16:9 1920x1080) : 156.9 x 78.9 x 7.9 mm (6.18 x 3.11 x 0.31 in)
iPhone 8 Plus (5.5" 16:9 1920x1080) : 6.24 inches (158.4 mm) x 3.07 inches (78.1 mm) x 0.30 inch (7.5 mm)
Galaxy S8+ (6.2" 18.5:9 2960x1440) 159.5 x 73.4 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.32 in)
The running trend with the newest phones is narrower and longer (2:1 or even 21:9, vs. the older 16:9 or even 16:10 or 4:3 on old enough phones... at the same time many Android tables have gone back to the 4:3 which iPad never left)... which isn't super for me but seems popular with a lot of people.
#43
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,555
I'm still in the small(er) screen camp, but I have to admit the Note 8 is a pretty glorious-looking device. I've never actually owned a phone that size so I'm not sure how I'd like it on a day-in-day-out basis. It does look a bit bulky for pockets...that'd be my main hesitation.
#44
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: TPA
Programs: Hilton Gold, DL DIrt Medallion
Posts: 38,267
The Note 8 is an incredible device. Samsung seems to have finally worked out its UI lag with a combination of software tweaks and brute force (6 GB RAM). I have read that there are still frame drops in the UI, but I can't see them for whatever that's worth. I don't know if that's because I have imperfect vision of if using Nova Prime eliminates any of the frame drops.
#45
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
The biggest improvement is the ability to run apps full-screen. Samsung's Galaxy store has a [small] number of Dex-compatible apps, but the biggest news is that the Dex software can run most Nougat-compatible apps in full-screen, even if they don't take advantage of the Dex APIs.
As I mentioned in an earlier post, the availability of VPN (built into the Note 8, as it is with most contemporary Android phones), and VNC apps that will run full-screen under Dex, means I can easily access my remote computers and, if necessary, run my Windows apps from my Note 8. The availability of an Android Display Link driver means that I'm not tied to a bulky HDMI-equipped monitor, but can use my very light and portable Asus 15" USB monitor at 1920 x 1080.
The Note 8 is an incredible device. Samsung seems to have finally worked out its UI lag with a combination of software tweaks and brute force (6 GB RAM). I have read that there are still frame drops in the UI, but I can't see them for whatever that's worth. I don't know if that's because I have imperfect vision of if using Nova Prime eliminates any of the frame drops.