Nas advice
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: source of weird and eccentric ideas
Posts: 38,674
Nas advice
I run a few macs and iPads and an iphone and a roku 3 at home. I want to be able to stream and view documents on the network. I don't care so much about access from outside the firewall. I do care a lot about security. I would like a box that can accommodate several hard drives with USB three. That lets me connect a few drives out and needs them available on the network. I noticed a lot of NAS devices that require hard drives. But I have the hard drives already. Is there a magic box I can plug into my router that will let me access several hard drives internally using USB three connections.
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 37,486
I use (and love) this one: http://www.netgear.com/business/prod...#tab-techspecs
Are your drives already inside external enclosures, and you don't want to open up the enclosures and place them inside a NAS? Have you considered a new router?
This Asus router is rock solid, and has two USB 3.0 ports built in:
https://www.asus.com/us/Networking/RTAC68U/
Are your drives already inside external enclosures, and you don't want to open up the enclosures and place them inside a NAS? Have you considered a new router?
This Asus router is rock solid, and has two USB 3.0 ports built in:
https://www.asus.com/us/Networking/RTAC68U/
#3
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 460
The performance of storage devices hanging off routers' USB ports is typically very poor compared to purpose-built NAS hardware though there are a few exceptions. Take note of the effect of hard drive formatting in the article referenced below:
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wirel...owall=&start=1
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wirel...owall=&start=1
#4
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SIN / SFO
Programs: UA GS, SQ PPS, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, Accor Gold
Posts: 1,215
I understand wanting to use your existing USB3 external drives, but as unmesh notes, this will significantly cut performance. The good news, though, is that you can easily pull the drives out of their enclosures and throw them into a NAS, preserving all existing data and eliminating the need to buy new drives.
Personally, I'm a big fan of Synology's products: they are reliable, have lots of features (media servers, backup support, etc.), and affordable.
Take a look at the Synology DiskStation DS411slim—it has slots for four drives, so you'd be able to add more space if you need it later.
Personally, I'm a big fan of Synology's products: they are reliable, have lots of features (media servers, backup support, etc.), and affordable.
Take a look at the Synology DiskStation DS411slim—it has slots for four drives, so you'd be able to add more space if you need it later.
#5
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ORD / DUB / LHR
Programs: UA 1K MM; BA Silver; Marriott Plat
Posts: 8,243
On Synology devices the preparation process also includes loading the OS onto the primary hard drive.
#6
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 460
Is this true? I'm pretty sure it's not on Synology NASes; it will reformat the hard drive during the installation process. There may be other devices that don't require this reformatting.
On Synology devices the preparation process also includes loading the OS onto the primary hard drive.
On Synology devices the preparation process also includes loading the OS onto the primary hard drive.
One thing the OP could consider is buying a single slot Synology such as the DS114, add a small internal hard drive to it to get it up and running and then attach his USB drives and share them on the network without reformatting. The NAS has only 2 USB 3.0 ports but Richard's use case might not suffer too much even if he has to use a USB 3.0 hub to expand the number of ports.
In the longer run, Scifience's advice to go with internal drives is very sound.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: source of weird and eccentric ideas
Posts: 38,674
This is exactly what I needed, thank you so much. Thinking know about either the four bay or the one-bay Synology.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,230
Just another vote for Synology. Good price, reliable, and the company is very responsive to support and feature requests.
#9
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London
Programs: AA EXP, SPG Plt
Posts: 2,607
Wirelessly posted (Blackberry8700c: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; HTC6525LVW Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.99 Mobile Safari/537.36)
I love my synology ds411j+. I've stuffed it with 4tb drives and will probably move to all 6tb once they reach mass market availability. It's super reliable and I can stream multiple hd streams over my Lan via the gigabit ethernet port.
I love my synology ds411j+. I've stuffed it with 4tb drives and will probably move to all 6tb once they reach mass market availability. It's super reliable and I can stream multiple hd streams over my Lan via the gigabit ethernet port.
#10
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SIN / SFO
Programs: UA GS, SQ PPS, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, Accor Gold
Posts: 1,215
Thanks for the correction—I didn't realize this as I'd purchased all new drives. Just assumed it would be the case as long as you didn't care about things like configuring a RAID array since external drives work fine without reformatting.
#12
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: City of Angels
Programs: DL Kettle| HH Pot
Posts: 525
+1 for Synology. I have the 213j running at home with a 3TB drive, one bay is still empty.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,781
There's something to be said for building your own NAS with a small PC and software; you have to do more work, but you also have a lot more control, and a lot more ability to repair problems, and do more interesting things (deduplication, streaming, private cloud.)
Cost (eta: without drives) is comparable to a premium home NAS solution without drives, say around $300 for a 4-6 drive capable box (using various Linux versions, either general purpose or NAS-specific, or FreeNAS which is FreeBSD-based)... not hard if you know what what's involved with building your own PC.
There are several online forums intended for home server builders. Biggest downside, besides having to develop some expertise, is that even a system built to be particularly thrifty with electricity will probably a bit use more electricity than a purpose-build NAS device at least until you get into the serious professional stuff.
(My own setup is well beyond this, now, but I started with a cheapy Shuttle XPC system and two mirrored drives just over a decade ago.)
Cost (eta: without drives) is comparable to a premium home NAS solution without drives, say around $300 for a 4-6 drive capable box (using various Linux versions, either general purpose or NAS-specific, or FreeNAS which is FreeBSD-based)... not hard if you know what what's involved with building your own PC.
There are several online forums intended for home server builders. Biggest downside, besides having to develop some expertise, is that even a system built to be particularly thrifty with electricity will probably a bit use more electricity than a purpose-build NAS device at least until you get into the serious professional stuff.
(My own setup is well beyond this, now, but I started with a cheapy Shuttle XPC system and two mirrored drives just over a decade ago.)
Last edited by nkedel; May 15, 2014 at 2:32 am
#14
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: NYC
Programs: AA 2MM, Bonvoy LTT, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 14,635
Synology can also function as a VPN server in reference to the other thread on hulu/Netflix/China blocking access.
#15
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 460
Password based authentication in OpenVPN is very easy to set up through the GUI though it takes a little bit of command shell work to get client certificates working.