Last edit by: nkedel
Some of the popular routers in this thread:
Edimax 6258NL (or via Amazon)
Asus wL-330nul
TP-Link WR702N
TP-LINK TL-WR710N (out of production, but superceded by similar models)
Edimax BR-6258n
Hootoo Tripmate Nano (TM-02)
GLi GL-AR300M
GL.iNet GL-AR750 Travel AC Router - a higher-powered dual band option; probably bigger than most people want, but if you need it... (has its own thread here)
Edimax 6258NL (or via Amazon)
Asus wL-330nul
TP-Link WR702N
TP-LINK TL-WR710N (out of production, but superceded by similar models)
Edimax BR-6258n
Hootoo Tripmate Nano (TM-02)
GLi GL-AR300M
GL.iNet GL-AR750 Travel AC Router - a higher-powered dual band option; probably bigger than most people want, but if you need it... (has its own thread here)
World's Smallest Wireless Router for Hotel Rooms
#571
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,277
What is the consensus these days on the best little router? Important things to me are the ability to route all traffic through a VPN (IPSec or OpenVPN) and that I can configure the router via wireless even if it doesn't have a wireless connection. I had a Hootoo Tripmate that I installed OpenWRT on, and if I took it to a new hotel, say, I'd have to connect to it via ethernet to configure it because if it couldn't connect to its most recent wireless WAN it would refuse to broadcast its wireless LAN network as well.
They also seem to keep on top of security updates pretty well. For example: https://www.gl-inet.com/forums/topic...masq-and-wpa2/
#572
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Somewhere in Florida
Posts: 2,619
#573
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,277
2 reasons I continue to use it: 1) Single sign-in, 2) Security. Don't underestimate how much simpler #1 makes life, especially if you're trying to use something like a Roku/FireTV stick on the road. The travel routers are so small that I'd never notice the weight savings of carrying/not carrying it, and they've become immensely helpful. I pressed ALL of mine into service after Hurricane Irma, using them to bridge hardwired LANs on clients' networks to cellular hotspots. I can't really come up with a good reason NOT to carry it.
#574
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2
One of my preferences is to have both WAN & LAN ports. Makes it more flexible and secure when required.
Another is for dual band. Sometimes the Wifi is so crowded, being able to connect on 2.4GHz and locally transmit on 5GHz seems a winner to me.
The Netgear PR2000 has dual ports but not dual band & has been on my travels the last few years. I found it and it's software more robust than on the TP-link MR3020 sitting in my drawer.
The PR2000 is a plug pack design, but can also be USB powered.
I've been monitoring the GL-iNet.com products for a while & that's what I'd buy if I were to buy a new one today. I was holding out for a small dual band version, however the dual band version recently released is a little on the large size. Still may be
Another dual band one is the TP-Link WR902AC. Only one LAN port though.
Onboard VPN is an advantage, however regular VPN's are frequently blocked (eg China's GFW) & in those cases better to use a PC or mobile client.
Another is for dual band. Sometimes the Wifi is so crowded, being able to connect on 2.4GHz and locally transmit on 5GHz seems a winner to me.
The Netgear PR2000 has dual ports but not dual band & has been on my travels the last few years. I found it and it's software more robust than on the TP-link MR3020 sitting in my drawer.
The PR2000 is a plug pack design, but can also be USB powered.
I've been monitoring the GL-iNet.com products for a while & that's what I'd buy if I were to buy a new one today. I was holding out for a small dual band version, however the dual band version recently released is a little on the large size. Still may be
Another dual band one is the TP-Link WR902AC. Only one LAN port though.
Onboard VPN is an advantage, however regular VPN's are frequently blocked (eg China's GFW) & in those cases better to use a PC or mobile client.
#576
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 19
Came across this post looking for a solution for a very similar use case - thanks for all the great info guys!
Basically I'm trying to have a set up whereby I have a 802.11ac router with its own SSID and OpenVPN config all ready to go, and simply need to repeat a WiFi signal when I'm visiting clients. Weight is not really an issue for me as I often spend a couple of weeks at on a client premises but I want to be able to "config and forget" my router for about 5 devices. So all I have to do each time is simply to get the router to repeat the signal of the client's WiFi.
Just to confirm my understanding - the GL-AR750 would be able to do that, wouldn't it?
Basically I'm trying to have a set up whereby I have a 802.11ac router with its own SSID and OpenVPN config all ready to go, and simply need to repeat a WiFi signal when I'm visiting clients. Weight is not really an issue for me as I often spend a couple of weeks at on a client premises but I want to be able to "config and forget" my router for about 5 devices. So all I have to do each time is simply to get the router to repeat the signal of the client's WiFi.
Just to confirm my understanding - the GL-AR750 would be able to do that, wouldn't it?
#577
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,277
Came across this post looking for a solution for a very similar use case - thanks for all the great info guys!
Basically I'm trying to have a set up whereby I have a 802.11ac router with its own SSID and OpenVPN config all ready to go, and simply need to repeat a WiFi signal when I'm visiting clients. Weight is not really an issue for me as I often spend a couple of weeks at on a client premises but I want to be able to "config and forget" my router for about 5 devices. So all I have to do each time is simply to get the router to repeat the signal of the client's WiFi.
Just to confirm my understanding - the GL-AR750 would be able to do that, wouldn't it?
Basically I'm trying to have a set up whereby I have a 802.11ac router with its own SSID and OpenVPN config all ready to go, and simply need to repeat a WiFi signal when I'm visiting clients. Weight is not really an issue for me as I often spend a couple of weeks at on a client premises but I want to be able to "config and forget" my router for about 5 devices. So all I have to do each time is simply to get the router to repeat the signal of the client's WiFi.
Just to confirm my understanding - the GL-AR750 would be able to do that, wouldn't it?
#578
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: YVR
Programs: Aeroplan, AAdvantage
Posts: 2,100
The GL-AR750 is way too big for this thread please see OpenWRT, USB powered, dual band multi RJ45 travel router instead.
#579
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 19
Is your GL-AR300M solid enough for 5-10 devices?
And once it's connected to the WiFi network of my choice, is there any reason why services shouldn't work? I mean will the OpenVPN tunnel insure that my navigation is completely untraceable from the host?
#580
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,277
Correct, possibly with some sort of kill switch to prevent leaks, albeit I understand the latest firmware forces you to input custom DNSs to prevent that (not quite a kill switch though)
Is your GL-AR300M solid enough for 5-10 devices?
And once it's connected to the WiFi network of my choice, is there any reason why services shouldn't work? I mean will the OpenVPN tunnel insure that my navigation is completely untraceable from the host?
Is your GL-AR300M solid enough for 5-10 devices?
And once it's connected to the WiFi network of my choice, is there any reason why services shouldn't work? I mean will the OpenVPN tunnel insure that my navigation is completely untraceable from the host?
#581
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco/Sydney
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Something, IHG Gold, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 8,152
#582
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,781
Do they have guest wifi, or only secured? In general, outside vendors would be on the guest wifi, and repeating that for their own VPN use wouldn't be a problem.
#583
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 19
Originally Posted by docbert
Do you have your clients permissions to do this? At many companies being caught doing that would be a quick way to be shown the door and never let back in...
Originally Posted by nkedel
In general, outside vendors would be on the guest wifi, and repeating that for their own VPN use wouldn't be a problem.
However, as weight is not really an issue for me, I'm still puzzled whether this is the most home-router-like solution
#584
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,781
Exactly right. I would be on their guest network where they've expressly authorised me to connect how I wish, albeit I usually sign a waiver form for illicit activities (which I'll be too busy to go for anyway).
However, as weight is not really an issue for me, I'm still puzzled whether this is the most home-router-like solution
However, as weight is not really an issue for me, I'm still puzzled whether this is the most home-router-like solution
#585
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 19
thanks!