Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Technology
Reload this Page >

Why Don't more travelers use remote desktop.

Why Don't more travelers use remote desktop.

Old Feb 5, 2011, 7:27 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: DL NWA UA
Posts: 177
Why Don't more travelers use remote desktop.

A few years ago after getting sick of the small keyboard and no numerical keypad I got a real desktop computer and my laptop is a dumb computer that just connects via remote desktop to my office computer

If I lose my laptop or have it stolen it's just a hardware loss, no files

A good friend of mine had his laptop stolen on a trip which begged me to ask, if you travel so much why would you keep important files on a laptop that can be stolen?

Anyone else a fellow remote desktopper around here?
FL2009 is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2011, 7:59 pm
  #2  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
Because it can be slow

Because it will only work if you are online, you can lose eight hours of work on a plane if they don't have internet you could be doing stuff

Because some companies don't allow remote access to their desktops

Because many people have enough problems without trying to use remote access

There are other ways to protect your files besides remote access.
cordelli is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2011, 9:20 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: PHX/SFO/LAX
Programs: AA-EXP (1.7MM), BA-Slvr, HH-Diamond
Posts: 7,784
Originally Posted by FL2009
if you travel so much why would you keep important files on a laptop that can be stolen?

Anyone else a fellow remote desktopper around here?
I use it on occasion when I need to do something on my server, but I don't use it as a replacement for my laptop.

If you're that concerned about losing files, then a cloud based backup solution may be better for you.
ByrdluvsAWACO is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2011, 10:29 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TYO / WAS / NYC
Programs: American Express got a hit man lookin' for me
Posts: 4,595
I use Dropbox to store documents and Google Chrome to sync browser plugins/history/bookmarks across the four computers that I regularly use. Works like a charm even when one of them is offline.
joejones is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2011, 1:23 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Programs: No single airline or hotel chain is of much use to me anymore.
Posts: 3,278
We have had a pilot project combined with iPad's, extremely mixed results. We also have some bandwidth problems in a couple locations that make it rather agonizing.
Error 601 is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2011, 9:09 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: DSM
Programs: "I COME FROM Des Moines. Somebody had to." -- Bill Bryson
Posts: 1,135
I use VNC on an iPad within my own home but there can be issues (security and connectivity) when I am not at home so I don't do it off my own private network. The reality is that most people are not always connected and when they are you often encounter networks that block the ports needed to remotely connect to a home computer or network.
UAVirgin is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2011, 8:40 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: UA 1K, H.H. Gold, Hyatt GP Plat, SPG Gold, Enterprise Plat, Avis Pres Club
Posts: 248
Originally Posted by joejones
I use Dropbox to store documents and Google Chrome to sync browser plugins/history/bookmarks across the four computers that I regularly use. Works like a charm even when one of them is offline.
Dropbox is great. I had used Windows live before that, but it is no longer functional. I use DB for my 5 computers also, and share files with all 5 other employees in our company.
SEABrad is offline  
Old Feb 7, 2011, 8:54 pm
  #8  
Moderator Hilton Honors, Travel News, West, The Suggestion Box, Smoking Lounge & DiningBuzz
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,018
I use a combination of the free versions of Logmein, Syncplicity, and Xmarks. Pretty well covers my needs.
cblaisd is offline  
Old Feb 7, 2011, 9:43 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 317
I just use dropbox and flash drives. I don't know why, but remote desktop feels more like a "security risk."
godlovesugly is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2011, 9:06 am
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Programs: DL SM, UA MP.
Posts: 12,729
I've been using screen sharing programs for years.

But what I don't get are services like Go To My PC which charge monthly for the service.

Are they offering more than simple screen control?

The various screen-sharing programs on the iPad are among the most expensive.

Some hotel wifi networks are too poor for screen sharing, which is saying something because I used to be able to do it over dialup.
wco81 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2011, 9:15 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,229
Originally Posted by godlovesugly
I just use dropbox and flash drives. I don't know why, but remote desktop feels more like a "security risk."
I tend to agree with this assessment...I figure it's safe enough if you disable/rename the local administrator account and have a good strong password. But I just feel better with public key SSH.
gfunkdave is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2011, 9:34 am
  #12  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
Originally Posted by wco81
But what I don't get are services like Go To My PC which charge monthly for the service.

Are they offering more than simple screen control?
Back in the day they offered significant advantages over the free versions, things like FTP, more screen resolutions to pick from, remote printing, the ability to run under any user and not just the administrator, things like that.

When I first started using remote access, Go to my PC was significantly different than things like logmein that one was usable and worth it to pay for, the other was really not worth the effort of trying to get it to work.

Another huge advantage to things like gotomypc is if it's in corporate environment is you can get site licenses, track use, etc.

That was then, this is now, and things like the Microsoft Mesh product do pretty much everything I need for free.
cordelli is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2011, 1:42 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,154
Originally Posted by godlovesugly
I just use dropbox and flash drives. I don't know why, but remote desktop feels more like a "security risk."
While I don't necessarily disagree with that last part, I do find it a little ironic, given that with dropbox you've now allowed some company to have access to your files, and you never really know exactly what they might do with it.

I'm just not quite trusting enough of dropbox to use it for anything I'd consider sensitive.
piper28 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2011, 3:58 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SNA, LAX
Posts: 418
Originally Posted by piper28
I'm just not quite trusting enough of dropbox to use it for anything I'd consider sensitive.
You could always put your file in a zip or even a TrueCrypt container with a good strong password. Not unbreakable, but pretty secure.
whitearrow is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2011, 5:26 pm
  #15  
Used to be 'Travelergcp'
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Orleans
Programs: AA Plat, Marriott Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,826
Terrible performance over high-latency 3G or hotel internet.
TravelerMSY is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.