A lot of carriers have a 22x14x9 limit - is this absolutely strict?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2
A lot of carriers have a 22x14x9 limit - is this absolutely strict?
I'm looking at the new Rimowa Cabin carry-ons, and they're basically 22x16x9. So it would seem the width is slightly larger than what's allowed.
Is this strictly enforced? Can anyone report carrying on their Rimowa Cabin on any airline with no issue?
I was picking between the Arlo Skye black aluminum carry-on, which is exactly 22x14x9, or this. After consideration I think I'd rather have the Rimowa, but only if I can actually carry it on to most airlines.
Is this strictly enforced? Can anyone report carrying on their Rimowa Cabin on any airline with no issue?
I was picking between the Arlo Skye black aluminum carry-on, which is exactly 22x14x9, or this. After consideration I think I'd rather have the Rimowa, but only if I can actually carry it on to most airlines.
#2
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: gggrrrovvveee (ORD)
Programs: UA Pt, Marriott Ti, Hertz PC
Posts: 6,091
Depends on the carrier, as well as sometimes the gate agent, the type of ticket or boarding group (e.g., they tend to be more strict with latter boarding groups or those on "basic" or highly restricted budget fare classes).. Where do you typically fly and what do you mean by "most airlines?" Which are your typical carriers? If anywhere outside North America, my general experience is that 22" carry-ons are considered large.
#3
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,374
No, it's not strict. I have a bag that's just within the 22x14x9 limit, and on literally every flight, I see passengers carry noticeably larger bags.
Having said that, if you fly frequently enough, a by-the-book agent is going to catch up to you. While I agree with @gobluetwo I've noticed GAs (especially on American Airlines) be stricter with the early boarding groups. Gate agents will get the first few folks to size their bags. Then, as the line grows longer and more passengers get anxious to scan their BPs, the GAs drop the schtick.
With an oversize bag, the worst case is you'll be forced to check the bag and pick it up at baggage claim. So just be sure you can quickly grab any essentials out of the bag, if it comes to that.
Edit to add. Some years ago at PHL, I was stopped in the ticketing area -- as I was walking to the TSA line -- by an AA agent who demanded I size my bag. It fit, and I was on my way, but it very much felt like a sting operation.
Having said that, if you fly frequently enough, a by-the-book agent is going to catch up to you. While I agree with @gobluetwo I've noticed GAs (especially on American Airlines) be stricter with the early boarding groups. Gate agents will get the first few folks to size their bags. Then, as the line grows longer and more passengers get anxious to scan their BPs, the GAs drop the schtick.
With an oversize bag, the worst case is you'll be forced to check the bag and pick it up at baggage claim. So just be sure you can quickly grab any essentials out of the bag, if it comes to that.
Edit to add. Some years ago at PHL, I was stopped in the ticketing area -- as I was walking to the TSA line -- by an AA agent who demanded I size my bag. It fit, and I was on my way, but it very much felt like a sting operation.
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2
Depends on the carrier, as well as sometimes the gate agent, the type of ticket or boarding group (e.g., they tend to be more strict with latter boarding groups or those on "basic" or highly restricted budget fare classes).. Where do you typically fly and what do you mean by "most airlines?" Which are your typical carriers? If anywhere outside North America, my general experience is that 22" carry-ons are considered large.
I've been carrying a Filson Medium duffel bag as my main travel bag that I carry on. Never stuffed to the brim but I've never had any issues with this bag. I guess it's harder to instantly gauge the size of a duffel versus hard luggage.
#5
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: California
Posts: 463
Enforcement is very rare within the US so you should be fine domestically.
But 22x14x9 is too large for most non-US carriers - so keep this in mind if you plan to fly internationally on foreign airlines. This is especially relevant for LCCs or even legacy carriers' 'hand baggage only' fares where part of the airline's revenue by design comes from catching people with oversized bags and charging them a hefty fee for checking the bag at the gate.
Also, don't Rimowas have a reputation for being heavy bags even when empty? Some carriers have quite strict weight limitations for carry-ons, and Rimowas are easy to target due to their distinctive appearance.
But 22x14x9 is too large for most non-US carriers - so keep this in mind if you plan to fly internationally on foreign airlines. This is especially relevant for LCCs or even legacy carriers' 'hand baggage only' fares where part of the airline's revenue by design comes from catching people with oversized bags and charging them a hefty fee for checking the bag at the gate.
Also, don't Rimowas have a reputation for being heavy bags even when empty? Some carriers have quite strict weight limitations for carry-ons, and Rimowas are easy to target due to their distinctive appearance.
Last edited by Agneisse; Jan 3, 2019 at 12:11 am
#6
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: FRA, ATL, IAD, CLT, CHS
Programs: M/M
Posts: 147
I liked the comment I heard from one flight attendant on an LCC, "Let's be real, we all know your designer carry-on is fake or you are living outside your means, because if that wasn't the case, you wouldn't be flying (said LCC) and this would never be an issue flying first class on a legacy airline."
The only carriers I've encountered with strict weight limits for carry-ons were LCCs. If you can't afford to check the heavy RIMOWA or another high-end piece of luggage, you should have never bought it in the first place.
Also known as, cost of ownership.
The only carriers I've encountered with strict weight limits for carry-ons were LCCs. If you can't afford to check the heavy RIMOWA or another high-end piece of luggage, you should have never bought it in the first place.
Also known as, cost of ownership.
#7
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: Marriot Am, MU Pt
Posts: 3,092
Depends on many factors: Airline, class of service, how full is aircraft, mood of check-in/gate agents.
I have a 26" Tumi (26x18x10) that I brought onto several flights simply because I was too late to the airport to do baggage drop and I already checked in on my phone. I was flying F so they put it in a closet for me.
I have a 26" Tumi (26x18x10) that I brought onto several flights simply because I was too late to the airport to do baggage drop and I already checked in on my phone. I was flying F so they put it in a closet for me.
#8
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New York City + Vail, CO
Programs: American Airlines Executive Platinum, Marriott Bonvoy Ambassador Elite
Posts: 3,226
Last year I was in DFW carrying an extra carry on for my mom who was already on the other side of security. There was an AAgent wearing a blue vest who attempted to stop me from getting into the security line saying "two bags only." I ignored her, and got into line, she tried persisting, and I told her to get a law enforcement officer if she wanted me to leave the line, she then left me alone.
#11
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: YVR
Programs: Aeroplan, AAdvantage
Posts: 2,100
I liked the comment I heard from one flight attendant on an LCC, "Let's be real, we all know your designer carry-on is fake or you are living outside your means, because if that wasn't the case, you wouldn't be flying (said LCC) and this would never be an issue flying first class on a legacy airline."
Also, I vividly remember when Air Canada used to weigh carry ons at the business check in. (That was so monumentally stupid they stopped it quick but still.)
So, no, there are many levels of wealth and this sort of generalization is like "if you don't like it, rent a private jet".
Last edited by chx1975; Jan 21, 2019 at 6:48 pm
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Programs: Aeroplan, IHG, Enterprise, Avios, Nexus
Posts: 8,355
It is not absolutely strict right up until the moment the airline decides to enforce it which they will do occasionally. I've gone to a B&R Commuter which is slightly smaller than the maximum dimensions and even when the gate dragons are on the prowl it has never been stopped anywhere including Europe and Asia. I might not have as much stuff but it always stays with me.
#13
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,785
I'm looking at the new Rimowa Cabin carry-ons, and they're basically 22x16x9. So it would seem the width is slightly larger than what's allowed.
Is this strictly enforced? Can anyone report carrying on their Rimowa Cabin on any airline with no issue?
I was picking between the Arlo Skye black aluminum carry-on, which is exactly 22x14x9, or this. After consideration I think I'd rather have the Rimowa, but only if I can actually carry it on to most airlines.
Is this strictly enforced? Can anyone report carrying on their Rimowa Cabin on any airline with no issue?
I was picking between the Arlo Skye black aluminum carry-on, which is exactly 22x14x9, or this. After consideration I think I'd rather have the Rimowa, but only if I can actually carry it on to most airlines.