Tumi vs Rimowa
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: BUD
Programs: MA Plat, OW Emerald
Posts: 34
Tumi vs Rimowa
my checked bag arrived broken this morning and this is third one in last 2 years
this time i want to buy Tumi or Rimowa, i have several tumi's as carry on but never got one as checked bag
what is more durable, can anybody recommend/ comment
i thought of Rimowa topas 82L or Tumi Expandable Alpha
appreciate help on this one.
this time i want to buy Tumi or Rimowa, i have several tumi's as carry on but never got one as checked bag
what is more durable, can anybody recommend/ comment
i thought of Rimowa topas 82L or Tumi Expandable Alpha
appreciate help on this one.
Last edited by MalevP; Dec 14, 10 at 9:49 am
#2
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, AY, LX, SQ, Shangri La Golden Circle
Posts: 52
I've recently bought a Rimowa Salsa Deluxe and I love it. Its very durable and so far after three flights with it it hasnt sustained any damages at all.
I believe on of the key differences between Rimowa and Tumi is that one is made in Europe and the other is made in China
I believe on of the key differences between Rimowa and Tumi is that one is made in Europe and the other is made in China
#3
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 47,631
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
Neither? Briggs And Riley is virtually indestructable and has a lifetime warranty including airline damage. Oh, and it is cheaper.
Neither? Briggs And Riley is virtually indestructable and has a lifetime warranty including airline damage. Oh, and it is cheaper.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: LAX
Posts: 10,744
A shiny hard shell will have plenty of scratches and look rather beaten up after a few trips so I would definitely stay away from those.
For checked bags get smth less expensive (and less attractive to thieves): kirkland or samsonite or delsey.
For checked bags get smth less expensive (and less attractive to thieves): kirkland or samsonite or delsey.
#5
Join Date: Aug 2009
Programs: SPG Gold, SQ Blue, OZ Diamond, JAVA and occasionally C
Posts: 5,563
Tumi is not worth the price you pay, neither quality or warranty wise. Rimowa might be more durable but it is also not value for money since it doesn't have a lifetime warranty.
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: BUD
Programs: MA Plat, OW Emerald
Posts: 34
and i do want it to be strong
#7
Join Date: Aug 2009
Programs: SPG Gold, SQ Blue, OZ Diamond, JAVA and occasionally C
Posts: 5,563
i like tumi as carry on and laptop case, i know this arguable and everybody prefer different bags, i have tumi since ages and some of them for over ten years so i'm happy with it. i never bought it as a checked bag because i always used hard shell, mainly Samsonite, but now my black label Samsonite broke and i have 500euro credit from airline so i'm shopping for something at this price range
and i do want it to be strong
and i do want it to be strong
#8
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Berlin and Buggenhagen, Germany
Posts: 3,509
i like tumi as carry on and laptop case, i know this arguable and everybody prefer different bags, i have tumi since ages and some of them for over ten years so i'm happy with it. i never bought it as a checked bag because i always used hard shell, mainly Samsonite, but now my black label Samsonite broke and i have 500euro credit from airline so i'm shopping for something at this price range
and i do want it to be strong
and i do want it to be strong
The Rimowa will look beat up pretty quickly. It won't break but it will look beat up. If you don't mind, perhaps you can try it.
Also, Rimowa looks like a million bucks. Meaning it looks expensive even if it is beat up. Which suitcase do you think they will check or steal from more? The fancy Rimowa or the simple black nylon?
I see you are in Budapest. If you can, follow Gadgetfreaks suggestion and get a Briggs Riley.
The main thing is that you get a suitcase that has a good warranty rather than betting on it not to break. There are no unbreakable suitcases. In the infamous elephant test, the soft models did better than the hard cases.
If looks are not so important I might add Eagle Creek to the list of considerations. This should even be available in Europe. Not sure for BR.
Till
#9
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Toronto
Programs: Aeroplan, Starwood, Marriott
Posts: 4

my checked bag arrived broken this morning and this is third one in last 2 years
this time i want to buy Tumi or Rimowa, i have several tumi's as carry on but never got one as checked bag
what is more durable, can anybody recommend/ comment
i thought of Rimowa topas 82L or Tumi Expandable Alpha
appreciate help on this one.
this time i want to buy Tumi or Rimowa, i have several tumi's as carry on but never got one as checked bag
what is more durable, can anybody recommend/ comment
i thought of Rimowa topas 82L or Tumi Expandable Alpha
appreciate help on this one.
#10
Join Date: Jul 2008
Programs: AA 2.7MM LTP, UA Gold, Marriott LTT, Nat'l Emerald Exec)
Posts: 305
I fly about 200K miles a year.
Have tried just about everything.
NOTHING holds up like Rimowa. Period.
I have the Salsa Deluxe, a big one for checking and a 21" for carry on.
Skip everything else and get the Rimowa. You will not be sorry.
Have tried just about everything.
NOTHING holds up like Rimowa. Period.
I have the Salsa Deluxe, a big one for checking and a 21" for carry on.
Skip everything else and get the Rimowa. You will not be sorry.
#11
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Programs: BAEC-GGL, GFL, *A Gold, Hilton Diamond , IHG Diamond/Ambassador
Posts: 221

As Eleanor says, Rimowa will last very well and protect your belongings. The polycarbonate shell looks fine even when scratched - the color is all the way through. Also weighs less than most other bags and fits inside the international luggage guages, which Tumi may not do.
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 47,631
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; U; CPU OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
If it doesn't have an unconditional lifetime warranty I would take that as a very big negative.
If it doesn't have an unconditional lifetime warranty I would take that as a very big negative.
#13
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: DL PM MM SC; GE; Bonvoy Titanium; IHG Diamond
Posts: 2,233
That's not been my experience. My Rimowa Salsa lasted through roughly a dozen trips (as checked luggage) before it cracked beyond repair. Fortunately, it was new enough to be covered by the warranty and Rimowa replaced it (although I was very disappointed that my color was no longer available and I didn't love the options they offered me). I'm fairly happy with it, but if it breaks again and is not still covered by the warranty, I will not buy another.
#14
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA area
Programs: SPG Plat, Priority Pass
Posts: 319
Rimowa for sure. I can't think of anything more durable for a checked bag, and still lightweight. I've been a nylon checked bag person for years and the bag just gets destroyed every time I pick it off another carousel, broken or missing zippers, broken handles, etc. I was sick of that and switched to a Rimowa Topas and while yes the aluminum shell scratches easily and quickly looks beat up, its lightweight and probably the toughest luggage I've ever had. The polycarbonate looks even lighter, and polycarbonate is essentially the toughest material for luggage out there right now.
Tumi I use for carry-ons, wallets, and briefcases, but its not even in the same league as Rimowa for durability as checked luggage.
I'll probably get death threats for having this opinion, but I think Briggs & Reilly are too heavy for checked luggage, and makes a better carry-on product. I see why people like them, but I'll take a stronger Rimowa which made out of aluminum or polycarbonate, doesn't need to be repaired under warranty as much as a nylon bag, and is lighter.
Here's my take on the 3 brands discussed in this thread.
Rimowa:
PROS: Toughest luggage, with excellent construction from Germany. Very lightweight for its size and durability. If you care about the status, it is a luxury brand.
CONS: Very expensive. Does go from shiny to cosmetically beat up looking pretty quick. Available in fewer retail outlets at decent prices in North America. Yes it can possibly make you or your luggage a target, depending on where you travel. And no it doesn't have a lifetime warranty, if you care.
Tumi:
PROS: Nice designs, very executive fashion focused. Built decently. Available in many places on the internet, or physical locations, even at closeout stores.
CONS: Heavier than Rimowa. Alot less durable than Rimowa. Slightly cheaper but for alot less value in my opinion.
Briggs & Reilly:
PROS: lifetime Warranty. Built solidly. Least expensive of the three.
CONS: Very heavy, in my opinion. Designs are pretty bland.
Tumi I use for carry-ons, wallets, and briefcases, but its not even in the same league as Rimowa for durability as checked luggage.
I'll probably get death threats for having this opinion, but I think Briggs & Reilly are too heavy for checked luggage, and makes a better carry-on product. I see why people like them, but I'll take a stronger Rimowa which made out of aluminum or polycarbonate, doesn't need to be repaired under warranty as much as a nylon bag, and is lighter.
Here's my take on the 3 brands discussed in this thread.
Rimowa:
PROS: Toughest luggage, with excellent construction from Germany. Very lightweight for its size and durability. If you care about the status, it is a luxury brand.
CONS: Very expensive. Does go from shiny to cosmetically beat up looking pretty quick. Available in fewer retail outlets at decent prices in North America. Yes it can possibly make you or your luggage a target, depending on where you travel. And no it doesn't have a lifetime warranty, if you care.
Tumi:
PROS: Nice designs, very executive fashion focused. Built decently. Available in many places on the internet, or physical locations, even at closeout stores.
CONS: Heavier than Rimowa. Alot less durable than Rimowa. Slightly cheaper but for alot less value in my opinion.
Briggs & Reilly:
PROS: lifetime Warranty. Built solidly. Least expensive of the three.
CONS: Very heavy, in my opinion. Designs are pretty bland.
#15
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 47,631
Rimowa for sure. I can't think of anything more durable for a checked bag, and still lightweight. I've been a nylon checked bag person for years and the bag just gets destroyed every time I pick it off another carousel, broken or missing zippers, broken handles, etc. I was sick of that and switched to a Rimowa Topas and while yes the aluminum shell scratches easily and quickly looks beat up, its lightweight and probably the toughest luggage I've ever had. The polycarbonate looks even lighter, and polycarbonate is essentially the toughest material for luggage out there right now.
Tumi I use for carry-ons, wallets, and briefcases, but its not even in the same league as Rimowa for durability as checked luggage.
I'll probably get death threats for having this opinion, but I think Briggs & Reilly are too heavy for checked luggage, and makes a better carry-on product. I see why people like them, but I'll take a stronger Rimowa which made out of aluminum or polycarbonate, doesn't need to be repaired under warranty as much as a nylon bag, and is lighter.
Here's my take on the 3 brands discussed in this thread.
Rimowa:
PROS: Toughest luggage, with excellent construction from Germany. Very lightweight for its size and durability. If you care about the status, it is a luxury brand.
CONS: Very expensive. Does go from shiny to cosmetically beat up looking pretty quick. Available in fewer retail outlets at decent prices in North America. Yes it can possibly make you or your luggage a target, depending on where you travel. And no it doesn't have a lifetime warranty, if you care.
Tumi:
PROS: Nice designs, very executive fashion focused. Built decently. Available in many places on the internet, or physical locations, even at closeout stores.
CONS: Heavier than Rimowa. Alot less durable than Rimowa. Slightly cheaper but for alot less value in my opinion.
Briggs & Reilly:
PROS: lifetime Warranty. Built solidly. Least expensive of the three.
CONS: Very heavy, in my opinion. Designs are pretty bland.
Tumi I use for carry-ons, wallets, and briefcases, but its not even in the same league as Rimowa for durability as checked luggage.
I'll probably get death threats for having this opinion, but I think Briggs & Reilly are too heavy for checked luggage, and makes a better carry-on product. I see why people like them, but I'll take a stronger Rimowa which made out of aluminum or polycarbonate, doesn't need to be repaired under warranty as much as a nylon bag, and is lighter.
Here's my take on the 3 brands discussed in this thread.
Rimowa:
PROS: Toughest luggage, with excellent construction from Germany. Very lightweight for its size and durability. If you care about the status, it is a luxury brand.
CONS: Very expensive. Does go from shiny to cosmetically beat up looking pretty quick. Available in fewer retail outlets at decent prices in North America. Yes it can possibly make you or your luggage a target, depending on where you travel. And no it doesn't have a lifetime warranty, if you care.
Tumi:
PROS: Nice designs, very executive fashion focused. Built decently. Available in many places on the internet, or physical locations, even at closeout stores.
CONS: Heavier than Rimowa. Alot less durable than Rimowa. Slightly cheaper but for alot less value in my opinion.
Briggs & Reilly:
PROS: lifetime Warranty. Built solidly. Least expensive of the three.
CONS: Very heavy, in my opinion. Designs are pretty bland.
But what makes you think B&R needs repaired often? That certainly isnt my experience. I also dont understand the logic of heavier carry ons than checked bags. I do love the look of Rimowa thought.