Sony FF NEX announcement tonight!
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: LAX
Posts: 1,849
Sony FF NEX announcement tonight!
OK guys, if you are not excited, something is wrong with you
Up-to-date info on sonyalpharumors.com
If those cameras are anything close to my RX1R and they work well
with wide rangefinder lenses, tonight might be the most significant
photography announcement in years. Can't wait!
Andrew
Up-to-date info on sonyalpharumors.com
If those cameras are anything close to my RX1R and they work well
with wide rangefinder lenses, tonight might be the most significant
photography announcement in years. Can't wait!
Andrew
#3
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Finland
Programs: Almost anything with six to twelve steps...
Posts: 1,033
I am somewhat excited but probably for a different reason than the OP.
With more FF cameras in different classes, the sales and thereby the production of FF sensors increases and the prices come down, benefiting everybody who wants an FF camera regardless of the form factor.
Cheers,
T.
With more FF cameras in different classes, the sales and thereby the production of FF sensors increases and the prices come down, benefiting everybody who wants an FF camera regardless of the form factor.
Cheers,
T.
#4
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DCA/IAD
Programs: most of them
Posts: 3,283
Not being called NEX since it's FF.
It will depend on how the lens line up shakes out. But the advantage of other mirrorless systems is the small size and weight of the kit. While you can use adapters for other lenses that adds one more piece to the puzzle so added size and weight.
I know Olympus is pushing the E-M1 with Full Frame shootout comparisons that show even blown up huge most people can't tell the difference between FF and shots from the E-M1. Of course those shots are models in bright lighting conditions. Low light, high ISO comparisons might not be quite so favorable.
It's great that Sony continues to push the technology though.
It will depend on how the lens line up shakes out. But the advantage of other mirrorless systems is the small size and weight of the kit. While you can use adapters for other lenses that adds one more piece to the puzzle so added size and weight.
I know Olympus is pushing the E-M1 with Full Frame shootout comparisons that show even blown up huge most people can't tell the difference between FF and shots from the E-M1. Of course those shots are models in bright lighting conditions. Low light, high ISO comparisons might not be quite so favorable.
It's great that Sony continues to push the technology though.
#5
Suspended
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 738
Not being called NEX since it's FF.
It will depend on how the lens line up shakes out. But the advantage of other mirrorless systems is the small size and weight of the kit. While you can use adapters for other lenses that adds one more piece to the puzzle so added size and weight.
I know Olympus is pushing the E-M1 with Full Frame shootout comparisons that show even blown up huge most people can't tell the difference between FF and shots from the E-M1. Of course those shots are models in bright lighting conditions. Low light, high ISO comparisons might not be quite so favorable.
It's great that Sony continues to push the technology though.
It will depend on how the lens line up shakes out. But the advantage of other mirrorless systems is the small size and weight of the kit. While you can use adapters for other lenses that adds one more piece to the puzzle so added size and weight.
I know Olympus is pushing the E-M1 with Full Frame shootout comparisons that show even blown up huge most people can't tell the difference between FF and shots from the E-M1. Of course those shots are models in bright lighting conditions. Low light, high ISO comparisons might not be quite so favorable.
It's great that Sony continues to push the technology though.
#6
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Finland
Programs: Almost anything with six to twelve steps...
Posts: 1,033
#7
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DCA/IAD
Programs: most of them
Posts: 3,283
Don't hold your breath on that one. The E-M5 is still almost $1k. And initial demand for the E-M1 has apparently been huge (or at least hugely beyond Oly's ability to fill orders). Don't expect a new $800 E-M1 for a long, long time.
#8
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K+K
Programs: *G
Posts: 4,867
they dont have the lens selection of MFT either. looking at the EM1 for xmas
#9
Suspended
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 738
In any case, it's a moot point for me right now - I just got an E-PL5, and I have a Panasonic G5, and together they meet my needs. Any body I buy in the future needs to be well behaved with both the Panasonic 20mm lens and the 7-14mm lens, and NONE of the Olympus bodies are.
BTW, I wasn't expecting that $800 price any time soon - I'm realistically talking a year to a year and a half down the road in any case. BTW, Refurb E-M5s with an Olympus warranty can be gotten for $700 nowadays, if I wanted one, which I don't. My E-PL5 and G5 together cost me only about $600.
#10
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DCA/IAD
Programs: most of them
Posts: 3,283
Maybe. But people who are invested in m43 infrastructure (lenses, etc) are likely the ones driving E-M1 demand rather than newcomers. Although I am sure there are some newcomers as well. So those folks might consider the Sony. But again the lenses aren't there yet and when they are they will be very expensive. (not that m43 lenses are all cheap, but there are enough relative bargains in the line up)
#11
Suspended
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 738
Maybe. But people who are invested in m43 infrastructure (lenses, etc) are likely the ones driving E-M1 demand rather than newcomers. Although I am sure there are some newcomers as well. So those folks might consider the Sony. But again the lenses aren't there yet and when they are they will be very expensive. (not that m43 lenses are all cheap, but there are enough relative bargains in the line up)
The fact is, for the next year or so, these Sonys are going to be mainly used as great Full Frame backs for use on a whole raft of legacy manual focus lenses - and they will be great at serving that limited role, I have no doubt. But that's how long it's going to take before there is anything approaching a comprehensive NEW lens offering for them that would serve any serious user.
#13
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: LAX
Posts: 1,849
maybe it's limited, maybe not. Thanks to NEX many people started using
their old lenses on modern digital cameras, now it's possible to do
on a modern FF digital camera.
I know some amazing lenses like my Voigtlander 125 APO macro
work by far the best on a NEX, can't wait to mount it on a FF NEX.
I also refused to buy a digital Leica camera because they are so bad
it's not even funny (no, I'm not saying "expensive", I'm saying "bad").
Now I can put my great Leica glass on a great camera without cropping.
I think this market is large enough for Sony to take into consideration
in the design process, all the news about micro-lenses etc clearly
are aimed at people like me. There is honestly only one bit of info
we are all waiting for - how well it's gonna work with wide rangefinder lenses.
#14
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Asia based now
Programs: AA 1MM, Hyatt Gold, SPG lifetime
Posts: 487
Just started using this little puppy - RX1R. Exactly what a traveler wants - compact, sharp and very good low light performance.
OK guys, if you are not excited, something is wrong with you
Up-to-date info on sonyalpharumors.com
If those cameras are anything close to my RX1R and they work well
with wide rangefinder lenses, tonight might be the most significant
photography announcement in years. Can't wait!
Andrew
Up-to-date info on sonyalpharumors.com
If those cameras are anything close to my RX1R and they work well
with wide rangefinder lenses, tonight might be the most significant
photography announcement in years. Can't wait!
Andrew
#15
Suspended
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 738
maybe it's limited, maybe not. Thanks to NEX many people started using
their old lenses on modern digital cameras, now it's possible to do
on a modern FF digital camera.
I know some amazing lenses like my Voigtlander 125 APO macro
work by far the best on a NEX, can't wait to mount it on a FF NEX.
I also refused to buy a digital Leica camera because they are so bad
it's not even funny (no, I'm not saying "expensive", I'm saying "bad").
Now I can put my great Leica glass on a great camera without cropping.
I think this market is large enough for Sony to take into consideration
in the design process, all the news about micro-lenses etc clearly
are aimed at people like me. There is honestly only one bit of info
we are all waiting for - how well it's gonna work with wide rangefinder lenses.
their old lenses on modern digital cameras, now it's possible to do
on a modern FF digital camera.
I know some amazing lenses like my Voigtlander 125 APO macro
work by far the best on a NEX, can't wait to mount it on a FF NEX.
I also refused to buy a digital Leica camera because they are so bad
it's not even funny (no, I'm not saying "expensive", I'm saying "bad").
Now I can put my great Leica glass on a great camera without cropping.
I think this market is large enough for Sony to take into consideration
in the design process, all the news about micro-lenses etc clearly
are aimed at people like me. There is honestly only one bit of info
we are all waiting for - how well it's gonna work with wide rangefinder lenses.
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad...o-reasons.html