Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Photography
Reload this Page >

Most vital DSLR accessories?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Most vital DSLR accessories?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 29, 2013, 2:38 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 184
Question Most vital DSLR accessories?

I recently wrote an article online on the most vital DSLR accessories for new owners, but the list was rather short (8) so I wanted to know some more. Please keep your items to under $200 apiece since these are beginners.

Here's the original list
msit is offline  
Old May 29, 2013, 4:42 pm
  #2  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 738
An assistant to carry my gear
flyboy60 is offline  
Old May 29, 2013, 6:40 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 30,987
I stopped reading at item 1. Sorry to be rude, but advising the purchase of a $10 UV filter is about the worst advice you could give a newbie.
CPRich is offline  
Old May 29, 2013, 7:21 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DCA/IAD
Programs: most of them
Posts: 3,283
I kind of have to agree with CPRich. I would say a circular polarizer is a much more important tool than a UV filter.

I also prefer carbon fiber tripods which are usually a bit lighter but just as strong as aluminum. Of course you also need a head to go with the tripod and that's not on your list.

I also have to wonder what kind of quality a $20 fisheye lens has.
glennaa11 is offline  
Old May 29, 2013, 7:58 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Earth. Residency:HKG formerly:YYZ
Programs: CX, DL, Nexus/GE, APEC
Posts: 10,684
Written like a camera store salesman on commission, triple spiff on accessories!
tentseller is offline  
Old May 29, 2013, 8:51 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
Originally Posted by CPRich
I stopped reading at item 1. Sorry to be rude, but advising the purchase of a $10 UV filter is about the worst advice you could give a newbie.
What's so terrible about the idea of keeping a cheap filter always on your expensive glass as protection??
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old May 29, 2013, 8:53 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Earth. Residency:HKG formerly:YYZ
Programs: CX, DL, Nexus/GE, APEC
Posts: 10,684
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
What's so terrible about the idea of keeping a cheap filter always on your expensive glass as protection??
For protection, maybe.

The cheap filter then becomes the weakest link in the optical path.
tentseller is offline  
Old May 29, 2013, 10:14 pm
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 738
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
What's so terrible about the idea of keeping a cheap filter always on your expensive glass as protection??
I use lens caps for that.
flyboy60 is offline  
Old May 29, 2013, 10:24 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: Krisflyer
Posts: 183
I never use filters, I don't like the extra piece of glass which can increase, or even create flare in images.
ozdude is offline  
Old May 30, 2013, 8:17 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central California
Programs: Former UA Premex, now dirt
Posts: 6,531
I only agree with a couple of your "essentials" but everyone has their own sense of what is important. I would correct some misinformation though. On a consumer-grade DSLR with crop sensor, the fast-50 neither "mirrors the human eye" nor creates wide-angle shots. Unless used on a full-frame DSLR or film SLR, the 50 mm is a short telephoto. "Normal range" for crop-sensor DSLRs is 30-35 mm.

I'd agree with others that a UV filter isn't really very useful for digital photography. In the film days it had its place but for protection on a digital camera, a super-clear protection filter is far better. Better yet is NO filter, relying instead on the lens hood and cap to protect the lens.

You didn't mention lens hoods. I assume you include that as part of the lens but many beginners make the mistake of leaving it off - or in the reversed travel configuration all the time. The hood must be on and in the proper configuration to do the job and is far more important than any filter.

Although not really a "beginner" item, the most used filter in my camera bag is a circular polarizer. You need to know when and how to use it, though.

I'd add extra memory card(s) to your list, along with something to clean lens surfaces - a lens cloth, brush, or my preference, a lens pen. Small and easy to carry around, with a brush on one end and cleaning pad on the other.



.
abmj-jr is offline  
Old May 30, 2013, 8:47 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 66
The "nifty fifty" is a decent lens for the price. As others have mentioned, on a crop sensor, it's a short telephoto. For something this cheap, skip the filter.

A cheap UV filter becomes the weakest link. If you're spending $$$$ on expensive lenses, get high quality filters (preferably B&W, or Hoya). Otherwise, just use the lens hood for protection.

The only filters I use these days are circular polarizer and neutral density filters.

Tripods. Quality tripods and ballheads are expensive. Don't buy the junk stuff that is weak or is susceptible to vibrations.
iliopsoas is offline  
Old May 30, 2013, 8:59 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 642
If I am going to a really dirty, dusty place, I use Nikon NC (Neutral Clear) filters. I worry about dust particles scratching my lenses as I try to clean them in a rush.

Nothing wrong with a high quality clear filter for protection when needed.
tlott is offline  
Old May 30, 2013, 5:29 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 218
I use a two axis bubble level quite a bit. Helps avoid leaning people, downhill roads that don't, fake leaning towers etc. cost? about $20. And very useful with tripods.

Another tool: remote shutter release. goes well with a tripod, good for shake free long exposures etc. non-canon work and are cheap on amazon, b&H etc.

finally, the cheapest and most useful of all: a baggie and rubber band. Starting to drizzle? tear a hole in the bag for the lens to stick through. Rubber band in place. Put your hand through the big hole or work through the bag. Protects cameras quite well while you get that glistening shot.
klevin99 is offline  
Old May 30, 2013, 10:36 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,983
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
What's so terrible about the idea of keeping a cheap filter always on your expensive glass as protection??
The glass is expensive for specific reasons. A cheap filter in front of it defeats one or more of those reasons.

A better investment is a lens hood.
pnsnkr is offline  
Old May 30, 2013, 11:42 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: Krisflyer
Posts: 183
Originally Posted by klevin99
I use a two axis bubble level quite a bit. Helps avoid leaning people, downhill roads that don't, fake leaning towers etc. cost? about $20. And very useful with tripods.

Another tool: remote shutter release. goes well with a tripod, good for shake free long exposures etc. non-canon work and are cheap on amazon, b&H etc.

finally, the cheapest and most useful of all: a baggie and rubber band. Starting to drizzle? tear a hole in the bag for the lens to stick through. Rubber band in place. Put your hand through the big hole or work through the bag. Protects cameras quite well while you get that glistening shot.
All great ideas, completely agree.
ozdude is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.