Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel News
Reload this Page >

PDX-SJC Lost engine on Flight 406 12/19

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

PDX-SJC Lost engine on Flight 406 12/19

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2006, 9:41 pm
  #1  
RKG
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Home
Posts: 2,707
PDX-SJC Lost engine on Flight 406 12/19

Alaska's Flight 406, PDX - SJC was forced to return to Portland today due to losing the port engine about 10-15 minutes into the flight. I was seated in row 2 when we felt 4 big thumps. The plane noticeably slowed and we went into a couple of gentle turns. As we slowly lost altitude the pilot announced that we lost the port engine and we were returning to Portland. We arrived about 15 minutes later. There were many emergency vehicles ready and waiting for us. Thankfully, they were not needed. The landing was quite smooth! Kudos to the two great pilots!

-RKG
RKG is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2006, 9:43 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: PDX
Programs: UA Nobody, HH Silver, PC Platinum
Posts: 996
Glad to hear that everything went so well!
Kate
kykate is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2006, 10:29 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shuttling between LA and Tokyo
Programs: UA Lifetime Gold / BA GGL&CCR
Posts: 2,484
Everytime I read "lost engine" I always think of a plane physically losing an engine. Like you look out and you don't see an engine that's supposed to be there. But oh well. Glad to hear everything turned out well.
globetrekker84 is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2006, 10:35 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: QLA
Programs: SBUX Gold
Posts: 14,507
Glad to hear you arrived on terra firma safely.
IceTrojan is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2006, 10:39 pm
  #5  
RKG
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Home
Posts: 2,707
Originally Posted by globetrekker84
Everytime I read "lost engine" I always think of a plane physically losing an engine. Like you look out and you don't see an engine that's supposed to be there. But oh well. Glad to hear everything turned out well.
I understand what you are saying. I did not know how else to describe it. The engine was certainly still attached and upon landing, I did not see any damage or signs of smoke or fire damage. I just used the words of the pilot.

By the way, the aircraft was an MD80 and the registration number is N949AS. I had taken the short trip to Portland and back to San Jose to qualify for Platinum on NW. I must admit, in the middle of this experience, there was a moment or two when I thought that NW Gold Elite wouldn't be so bad after all...
RKG is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2006, 10:54 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: OOL Australia
Programs: QFF (Gold), Skywards, Rapid Rewards,United, Velocity, Hilton Silver
Posts: 2,440
Originally Posted by RKG
I understand what you are saying. I did not know how else to describe it. The engine was certainly still attached and upon landing, I did not see any damage or signs of smoke or fire damage. I just used the words of the pilot.

By the way, the aircraft was an MD80 and the registration number is N949AS. I had taken the short trip to Portland and back to San Jose to qualify for Platinum on NW. I must admit, in the middle of this experience, there was a moment or two when I thought that NW Gold Elite wouldn't be so bad after all...
Do you get the extra miles?
Lonely Flyer is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2006, 10:55 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: QLA
Programs: SBUX Gold
Posts: 14,507
Originally Posted by Lonely Flyer
Do you get the extra miles?
Wouldn't PDX-PDX = 0 miles. (Of course, then the 500 minimum kicks in )
IceTrojan is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2006, 10:58 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: OOL Australia
Programs: QFF (Gold), Skywards, Rapid Rewards,United, Velocity, Hilton Silver
Posts: 2,440
Originally Posted by IceTrojan
Wouldn't PDX-PDX = 0 miles. (Of course, then the 500 minimum kicks in )
Love those minimums
Lonely Flyer is offline  
Old Dec 20, 2006, 1:34 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shuttling between LA and Tokyo
Programs: UA Lifetime Gold / BA GGL&CCR
Posts: 2,484
Originally Posted by RKG
I understand what you are saying. I did not know how else to describe it.
Engine failure, engine malfunction, in-flight engine shutdown...

I know what you meant though.
globetrekker84 is offline  
Old Dec 20, 2006, 10:33 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,184
"Lost an engine" is how we refer to an engine failure. When you use a term frequently enough you forget that the specific usage is not universally understood.

There have been a number of incidents and accidents where the engines have litterally been lost. The engine pylons are designed to have a weak link so that a seriously damaged engine will come loose instead of transmitting extreme forces to the airframe. Three incidents come immediately to mind though I'm sure that there have been more. AA191 departing ORD in the late 1970s is one example. At least one B727 had an engine depart the airframe during cruise on the southwest US. A cargo B747 had an engine break lose near Anchorage.

A failed engine is an emergency (in a two-engined airplane at least) but it is one of the most practiced emergency procedures and should not cause an accident unless there are aggravating factors. The airplanes are designed to do it.
LarryJ is offline  
Old Dec 20, 2006, 11:10 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shuttling between LA and Tokyo
Programs: UA Lifetime Gold / BA GGL&CCR
Posts: 2,484
Originally Posted by LarryJ
"Lost an engine" is how we refer to an engine failure. When you use a term frequently enough you forget that the specific usage is not universally understood.
So what would a completely fallen off or separated engine be called?
globetrekker84 is offline  
Old Dec 20, 2006, 11:55 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,184
There isn't a common usage term for a separated engine as it is not a common event.
LarryJ is offline  
Old Dec 20, 2006, 1:29 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shuttling between LA and Tokyo
Programs: UA Lifetime Gold / BA GGL&CCR
Posts: 2,484
Originally Posted by LarryJ
There isn't a common usage term for a separated engine as it is not a common event.
Hm. I figured there'd be a name for it. Oh well.
globetrekker84 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.