Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel News
Reload this Page >

B797 - True Or False

B797 - True Or False

Old Jan 2, 2008, 12:43 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MUC (home), DUS (office), XXX (customer)
Programs: LH, AB, SPG, CC, Sixt, EC
Posts: 6,334
Originally Posted by fly2w

The new 797 is in direct response to the Airbus A380 which has racked up 159 orders, but has not yet flown any passengers.

Is this true?
No
supermasterphil is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2008, 12:49 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: EWR
Programs: UA, DL
Posts: 630
Originally Posted by supermasterphil
No
And I was getting all excited.
fly2w is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2008, 12:52 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MUC (home), DUS (office), XXX (customer)
Programs: LH, AB, SPG, CC, Sixt, EC
Posts: 6,334
Originally Posted by fly2w
And I was getting all excited.
supermasterphil is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2008, 12:54 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: EWR
Programs: UA, DL
Posts: 630
Originally Posted by supermasterphil
I was looking forward to fly on those cool looking planes.
fly2w is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2008, 2:04 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MUC (home), DUS (office), XXX (customer)
Programs: LH, AB, SPG, CC, Sixt, EC
Posts: 6,334
Originally Posted by fly2w
I was looking forward to fly on those cool looking planes.
My "no" was based on the statement that the A380 hasn't carried any pax yet. It's in scheduled service since end of October 07
supermasterphil is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2008, 2:11 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PEK
Programs: A3*G, UA Gold EY Silver
Posts: 9,010
It wouldn't be wise for Boeing to compete with the A380..... the market is pretty limited for these large birds...the 787 will be much more popular than the 797 over the course of its life (as you've seen with the 747 in recent years)
Palal is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2008, 2:29 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: EWR
Programs: UA, DL
Posts: 630
Originally Posted by supermasterphil
My "no" was based on the statement that the A380 hasn't carried any pax yet. It's in scheduled service since end of October 07
Sorry. I was asking if the B797 is true.
fly2w is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2008, 4:40 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Massachusetts, USA; AA Plat, DL GM and Flying Colonel; Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 24,294
Originally Posted by supermasterphil
My "no" was based on the statement that the A380 hasn't carried any pax yet. It's in scheduled service since end of October 07
Just one of several hints that the undated fake e-mail is from at least a few months ago. Another is the outdated order total for the A380, which was up to 193 (177 firm) when I last checked. (Still a good way from its 400+ break-even point, but that's a different topic.)

Also, the blended wing/body (BWB) concept is not exactly a secret. It was first used in 1929 in the Junkers G-38. (Photos on this page; third one down shows it best.) McDonnell-Douglas demonstrated a 1/16 scale model in July 1997. (Press release here.) An April 1999 article in Wings talked about how Boeing, which had acquired MD in the meantime, was studying it. If the potential advantages cited in the e-mail were not offset by more serious drawbacks, it would be in use by now.
Efrem is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2008, 7:50 pm
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Programs: Bar Alliance Gold
Posts: 16,271
The BWB is most likely first to enter service as a freighter - likely a military one to replace the C-5 Galaxy.
SEA_Tigger is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2018, 12:03 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: PHX Sky Harbor
Posts: 392
I originally posted this on wrong thread....I will try again, sorry:...... Can I put my 2 cents worth into the discussion. Boeing has current narrow bodies that has the capacity up to 220 seats (737MAX10's) and Wide bodies from 260 seats (787-800's). The "797's appear not to have a clear position (nitch) anywhere in either narrow or wide category. The only question is whether its an aircraft for international or domestic usage (a 757 replacement basically being a domestic aircraft) or international usage (a 767 replacement is the international aircraft). So, that being said, Boeing would receive a lot more satisfied customers by building a smaller international wide body aircraft at or just larger the the current 737MAX10 - in the neighborhood of 230 seat up to 260 seat aircraft. Now, that being said, can Boeing build such an aircraft and get it economical enough to use on (I guess) on the TATL routes exclusively? Maybe I'm way off base on my thinking - please give feedback, I'm all ears.
ChamplinAl is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2018, 8:42 pm
  #26  
Moderator Hilton Honors, Travel News, West, The Suggestion Box, Smoking Lounge & DiningBuzz
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,092
Because the original post is 12 years old, and the last prior activity 10 years ago, and because per the current practice there is no link to a published "general travel news story," I'm going to close this.

If [MENTION=887223]ChamplinAl[/MENTION] would like to re-post a new thread with a link to a published news story about the 797, that would be great.

Thank you,

cblaisd, Moderator, Travel News
cblaisd is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.