Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel News
Reload this Page >

Airways Magazine: The beginning of the end - first two A380s scrapped

Airways Magazine: The beginning of the end - first two A380s scrapped

Old May 8, 19, 4:40 pm
  #1  
Moderator: American AAdvantage, TAP, Mexico, Technical Support and Feedback, and The Suggestion Box
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,606
Airways Magazine: The beginning of the end - first two A380s scrapped

At the young age of 12, the first two Airbus A380s have been scrapped at Tarles, France, after being returned to their lessor at the end of lease by Singapore Airkines and stored temporarily. It had been hoped these aurcraft would find new owners in the secondary market, but as they did not they are being parted out and prepared for final scrapping. Empty engine cowls...

Link to article by Airways Magazine.
Attached Images  
SanDiego1K likes this.
JDiver is offline  
Old May 15, 19, 9:31 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Proud Charter Member of the OUM
Posts: 22,438
Very sad, though I don't know what an airkine is.

Hard to believe that these wouldn't be useful as cargo planes.
DenverBrian is offline  
Old May 16, 19, 9:57 pm
  #3  
Moderator: American AAdvantage, TAP, Mexico, Technical Support and Feedback, and The Suggestion Box
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,606
Originally Posted by DenverBrian View Post
Very sad, though I don't know what an airkine is.

Hard to believe that these wouldn't be useful as cargo planes.
Da airline kine. 😉

Most airliners have to go through heavy conversion to serve as freighters, and I think the problem with the A380 is there may be no practical way to remove the upper deck and modify it with a swing nose for heavy cargo.

The freight handlers sure love the A300-330 and DC-10 / MD-11, though.
JDiver is offline  
Old May 17, 19, 1:44 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: 42.1% in PDX , 49.9% in PVG & 8% in the air somewhere
Programs: Marriott Ambassador Elite, UA 1K, AS MVP GLD 75K, DL Pt
Posts: 1,064
Oh how did Airbus misscalculate on this one, who'd have predicted the direction of long distance travel was going to be super fuel efficient point to point of the latest twin engines from BA and AB.
hhdl likes this.
chipmaster is offline  
Old May 18, 19, 12:28 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: HNL
Programs: AS MVPG, Marriott Plat, UA Gold
Posts: 192
I can't say I'll miss them that much. A great technical achievement, but not pleasing to the eye. They never looked quite right to me. Then again, nothing has really measured up to the 747.
DenverBrian likes this.
finlandia is offline  
Old Jul 1, 19, 7:48 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Charlottesville, Va. USA
Posts: 1,566
In mt view airbus was trying so hard to one up Boeing they horribly miss judged the market for these planes. If i remember correctly Boeing opted out of building a direct competitor. Instead they went for more fuel efficient point to point aircraft. Seems they were right.
JDiver likes this.
jmj9905 is offline  
Old Jul 29, 19, 12:11 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 7
this is sad
trixcia001 is offline  
Old Dec 24, 19, 9:06 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brexile in ADB
Programs: BA, TK, HHonours, Le Club, Best Western Rewards
Posts: 6,710
Originally Posted by jmj9905 View Post
In mt view airbus was trying so hard to one up Boeing they horribly miss judged the market for these planes. If i remember correctly Boeing opted out of building a direct competitor. Instead they went for more fuel efficient point to point aircraft. Seems they were right.
The 737 MAX was right?
Worcester is online now  
Old Dec 24, 19, 12:06 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 3,132
Originally Posted by Worcester View Post
The 737 MAX was right?
787 Dreamliner was the right decision (although that one was also plagued with problems with its batteries, but it was the right decision in that it's what people want to fly). The MAX was an absolute debacle.
STS-134 is offline  
Old Dec 24, 19, 1:24 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Charlottesville, Va. USA
Posts: 1,566
Totaly agree STS-134.
jmj9905 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search Engine: