Carry-on Bags Costing TSA Millions a Year
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Biloxi, MS (GPT)
Programs: AA Gold, DL FO, HH Diamond
Posts: 1,278
#2
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LIS/ATL/other
Programs: UA 1K, Avis PC, Hertz PC, Sixt Plat, Marriott Gold, HH Silver
Posts: 1,983
Huh? I thought all luggage was screened these days: carry-on and checked luggage alike.
#3
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 736
Since they are busy looking in carry ons for things like toothpaste and shampoo, I don't have much sympathy.
#4
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,680
#5
In Memoriam
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
I don't get it.
At most airports since the airlines started putting in fees, they have not added security screening lanes, it's the same machine, the same person watching it, etc. They may be looking at more bags when before they were twiddling their thumbs because nothing was coming through the machine, but don't see how that's costing them more money.
If they opened more lanes that would be a different story....
At most airports since the airlines started putting in fees, they have not added security screening lanes, it's the same machine, the same person watching it, etc. They may be looking at more bags when before they were twiddling their thumbs because nothing was coming through the machine, but don't see how that's costing them more money.
If they opened more lanes that would be a different story....
#6
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LIS/ATL/other
Programs: UA 1K, Avis PC, Hertz PC, Sixt Plat, Marriott Gold, HH Silver
Posts: 1,983
I don't get it.
At most airports since the airlines started putting in fees, they have not added security screening lanes, it's the same machine, the same person watching it, etc. They may be looking at more bags when before they were twiddling their thumbs because nothing was coming through the machine, but don't see how that's costing them more money.
If they opened more lanes that would be a different story....
At most airports since the airlines started putting in fees, they have not added security screening lanes, it's the same machine, the same person watching it, etc. They may be looking at more bags when before they were twiddling their thumbs because nothing was coming through the machine, but don't see how that's costing them more money.
If they opened more lanes that would be a different story....
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Sunshine State
Programs: Deltaworst Peon Level, TSA "Layer 21 Club", NW WP RIP
Posts: 11,370
I have a bone to pick with this thread title and the title of the linked original article. I mantain it is impossible to "cost TSA any money". TSA has no money of it's own. It is allowed by Congress to spend allocated funds which are the Taxpayer's Money. The correct title is "TSA claims carrry-on bags waste tax dollars."
/soapbox
/soapbox
#8
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PDX
Programs: Delta 360, Alaska Gold, Hilton Gold, Marriot Gold
Posts: 92
The extra money comes from extra work. Since it takes way longer to screen all of the passengers with all of the baggage, they need more lines, more machines, and more people. TSA has been lobbying Congress to get a "fee" increase (that us passengers pay). This is just PR to help bring awareness.
I wonder how much more money the airlines make by carrying commercial cargo, in the holds, instead of passengers bags?
I wonder how much more money the airlines make by carrying commercial cargo, in the holds, instead of passengers bags?
#9
Moderator Hilton Honors, Travel News, West, The Suggestion Box, Smoking Lounge & DiningBuzz
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,027
Please follow the discussion here
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...-millions.html
cblaisd
Moderator, Newsstand
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...-millions.html
cblaisd
Moderator, Newsstand