Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel News
Reload this Page >

Jet Explosion Reported over Indonesia

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Jet Explosion Reported over Indonesia

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2010, 9:37 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: YOW
Programs: AC Elite (waddya mean it's expired?), HHonours Gold, bunch of other stuff
Posts: 859
Jet Explosion Reported over Indonesia

Globe and Mail reports this minutes ago, sketchy report that is is a Quantas 'Airbus 383', still circling, some debris found. Sounds odd that so little info yet debris found.

Any other reports?

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle1785044/

"Police and witnesses say they heard an explosion as a commercial airliner was flying over western Indonesia and found debris from the plane scattered near a shopping mall.

Police Colonel Eka Yudha told TVOne the plane was a Qantas Airbus, which was flying from Singapore to Australia when it had to dump fuel.

He was quoted as telling the station it had made an emergency landing, but later told The Associated Press the jetliner was apparently still circling the sky.

The report could not be independently confirmed.

Large pieces of debris – including panels painted white and red – were found on the Indonesian island of Batam, where witnesses reported hearing the loud bang early Thursday.
"
AC110 is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2010, 9:43 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SAN
Posts: 2,426
Qantas confirms A380.
schwarm is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2010, 9:45 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HH Diamond, Marriott Gold, IHG Gold, Hyatt something
Posts: 33,539
Q-A-N-T-A-S

Wow, guess Rainman was wrong, after all.

I hope this turns out to be wrong, as the human damage will be immense, if it crashes! Indonesia has had so much bad stuff happening lately, I hate to have anything else happen.

Hopefully it's just an engine, and all are safe.
Jaimito Cartero is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2010, 9:58 pm
  #4  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
Qantas plane made emergency landing - no crash

TVNZ Article


Qantas says the plane, flying from Singapore to Sydney, experienced engine problems.

"Qantas flight QF32 was enroute from Singapore to Sydney, the number two engine has shut down, so as a precautionary measure we are taking it back to Singapore," a Qantas spokeswoman said.

Earlier there were reports the plane had crashed. But Qantas has denied that, saying a passenger flight had experienced engine trouble and was returning to Singapore airport.

"There has not been a crash," a Qantas spokeswoman said, adding that flight QF32 had been forced to shut down one engine and was expected to land in Singapore around 0400 GMT.


Deep breath, folks.
Spiff is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2010, 10:22 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: YOW
Programs: AC Elite (waddya mean it's expired?), HHonours Gold, bunch of other stuff
Posts: 859
Originally Posted by Spiff
Qantas plane made emergency landing - no crash
Nice to hear.

Will be interesting to hear the whole story if the debris reports hold true - engine failures do not seem likely to drop debris like that.
AC110 is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2010, 10:27 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 85
Photo allegedly of the wing:
http://yfrog.com/f/0quh4dj/
walter82 is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2010, 11:55 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 31,008
CPRich is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2010, 4:34 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,605
I'm surprised - no-one has done the "Well that's why I only fly Boeing" line yet
alanR is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2010, 5:03 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ORD MDW
Programs: AA, UA, DL , IHG Plat, Bonvoy Gold - 2009 FT Fantasy Football Champion
Posts: 6,854
Originally Posted by alanR
I'm surprised - no-one has done the "Well that's why I only fly Boeing" line yet
or Amtrak, although flying Amtrak is quite difficult.
sobore is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2010, 6:03 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 12,242
Msnbc.com's story - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40000040...ws-asiapacific
wr_schwab is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2010, 6:06 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,605
Originally Posted by sobore
or Amtrak, although flying Amtrak is quite difficult.
You'd get wet going to Sydney
alanR is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2010, 7:31 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: AA EXP 3MM
Posts: 496
Originally Posted by alanR
I'm surprised - no-one has done the "Well that's why I only fly Boeing" line yet
Maybe the better line would be "I fly only GE or Pratt & Whitney" since the engine that suffered an uncontained turbine failure is a Rolls-Royce (and there are lots of Boeings equipped with big Rolls-Royce engines). The picture of the wing shows some substantial punches through, so it's good that no wing tanks were ignited!
altaskier is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2010, 8:00 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PEK
Programs: A3*G, UA Gold EY Silver
Posts: 8,956
Interesting, Quantas recently had a 747 have an uncontained engine failure departing from SFO. The two incidents are probably not related, but this is quite unusual. A problem with maintenance procedures, maybe?

QF34 was carrying 433 passengers and 26 crew, all of whom were evacuated by a step ladder in an operation that lasted two hours.
WHY did it take 2 hrs? Or is it 2 hrs from landing?

Last edited by Palal; Nov 4, 2010 at 8:11 am
Palal is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2010, 8:12 am
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Under an ORD approach path
Programs: DL PM, MM. Coffee isn't a drug, it's a vitamin.
Posts: 12,935
Originally Posted by Palal
WHY did it take 2 hrs?
F has 8 giant doors, but the 4,000 people in steerage all had to exit through a single CRJ style over-wing door.

Seriously, Qantas has grounded all six of their 380's until they figure this out.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20101104/...ingapore_plane

"It appears from the images of the plane that one of the engines has experienced a failure and it looks to be a fairly massive internal failure at that," said Peter Marosszeky at the University of New South Wales' aviation department.

"This failure has caused some of the engine ducting known as bypass ducting to depart from the engine. This type of incident has been seen previously but it was a long time ago and with much older planes than the A380."
Gargoyle is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2010, 8:17 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 599
Ugly failure, hope they find the cause (preferably soon)
bubb1 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.