Bangkok-Stockholm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Singapore
Programs: SQ PPS, BA Gold Executive, United 1K, HHonors VIP Gold, Hyatt Diamond Passport
Posts: 70
Bangkok-Stockholm
Hi guys
Do you know if Thai flies the recently retrofitted aircraft for the business class cabin for flights to Stockholm? Am on a premium economy (U) ticket and have been assigned upperdeck seats. What sort of service differentiation from regular economy can I expect on a U-class ticket. Am I wishfully thinking that i'll get the newer planes or is it more likely to be an old aircraft with rickety seats?
Bests,
FG
Do you know if Thai flies the recently retrofitted aircraft for the business class cabin for flights to Stockholm? Am on a premium economy (U) ticket and have been assigned upperdeck seats. What sort of service differentiation from regular economy can I expect on a U-class ticket. Am I wishfully thinking that i'll get the newer planes or is it more likely to be an old aircraft with rickety seats?
Bests,
FG
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: WLG/BKK
Programs: TG*G, NZ*GE, QF G, Accor Gold
Posts: 10,200
Thai's flights to Scandanavia (ARN and CPH) use the older version of the 747-400, and sell seats to this (presumably) price sensitive market as follows:
Economy Class - older 747-400 economy seat (hundreds of 'em)
Premium Economy - older 747-400 business class seat (50 of them)
Business Class - older 747-400 first class seat (14 of them)
See pictures here: http://www.thaiairways.co.th/eng/TG/...00.php?mid=744
Discussed a bit, so try a search for more information.
Economy Class - older 747-400 economy seat (hundreds of 'em)
Premium Economy - older 747-400 business class seat (50 of them)
Business Class - older 747-400 first class seat (14 of them)
See pictures here: http://www.thaiairways.co.th/eng/TG/...00.php?mid=744
Discussed a bit, so try a search for more information.
#3
Join Date: Jun 2007
Programs: SQ AA TK
Posts: 1,438
Well, in U class, you get better pitch, wider seats, and of course PTV with something like 6 channels. Economy class has got no PTV. The rest is the same. You might enjoy a more private cabin on the 744 upper deck. That's about it.
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Singapore
Programs: SQ PPS, BA Gold Executive, United 1K, HHonors VIP Gold, Hyatt Diamond Passport
Posts: 70
Bangkok-Stockholm
Thanks all. Just as I thought. Cant expect new cabins for relatively cheap tickets. I have upperdeck seats with a semblance of business class ambience. And am ok with that. Cheers
#5
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CPH
Programs: SK Diamond (*G), HH Gold
Posts: 580
Enjoy your trip.
Cheers,
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,556
Basically, U is a good deal from Scandinavia. You normally get the non-retrofitted planes, so that you sit in the "old" business class seats. They are not up to the lie-flat standards, but much better pitch and recline than the new U seats on TG or any other airline. The seat pitch is 50" with personal TV (not AVOD).
#8
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Copenhagen
Programs: EBS
Posts: 729
Some passangers must be upgraded, even if I doubt being *S will help
Last edited by bjerregaard; Jul 19, 2007 at 11:59 am
#10
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Copenhagen
Programs: EBS
Posts: 729
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denmark
Programs: TK Elite
Posts: 11,846
Don't rely on op-upgrade on TG. According to several threads in this Forum, TG does not overbook the Eco class much and op-grades are rare. Paid upgrade to Premium Eco is USD 650 o/w which in my opinion is not a good deal. DKK 13.000 in U class is OK.
#12
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: GSE
Programs: TG Gold
Posts: 441
The price from ARN have been around 12500 SEK.
Flew mid June and like 80% full in PE but when i went home end June we were a total of 8 people in upper deck and none downstairs.Business(old F) was totally sold out.
Btw, the flight home was bad.Service, food.And they showed some murdercase-movie on the little tv-screen, only one problem... it was at least 2 parts and they only showed part 1... twice....
One more thing,there was lots of mosquitos in the cabin upstairs.Maybe because the aircraft wasn't parked at a gate?
Flew mid June and like 80% full in PE but when i went home end June we were a total of 8 people in upper deck and none downstairs.Business(old F) was totally sold out.
Btw, the flight home was bad.Service, food.And they showed some murdercase-movie on the little tv-screen, only one problem... it was at least 2 parts and they only showed part 1... twice....
One more thing,there was lots of mosquitos in the cabin upstairs.Maybe because the aircraft wasn't parked at a gate?
#13
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CPH
Programs: SK Diamond (*G), HH Gold
Posts: 580
The U-class from Scandinavia has been discovered by many companay travel departments as it is almost impossible to get C-class seats with short notice due to high demand for premium travel and a limited number of seats in the old F-section. Compared to SK who also fly the route from CPH and later this year also from ARN the TG premium economy product is IMO superior to SK eco-extra in all aspects including the price (ok, IFE might be better in SK as it is now AVOD).
According to TG announcements changing from F-C-Y to a C-PE-Y configuration on the Scandinavian routes has increased the yields. Before F was almost empty and C had decent loads (50%). Now C is almost sold out and PE has very good loads (70-80%). Selling more seats to a lower average price apparently makes good business.
During the *A meeting in CPH this year TG vice president Wallop Bhukkanasut revealed that TG is considering increasing/double the number of flights to CPH as they are unable to meet the high demand for travel. According to the him the CPH route is the second most important TG route to Europe. TG does not have any available a/c's at the moment but a short term solution would be to extend the ATH-route to CPH as the load factor to ATH is only around 50%. For more details (sorry, only in Danish):
http://www.standby.dk/4435.0.html?&tx_standbynews_pi1[showUid]=23615&cHash=412d93d66f
Cheers,
According to TG announcements changing from F-C-Y to a C-PE-Y configuration on the Scandinavian routes has increased the yields. Before F was almost empty and C had decent loads (50%). Now C is almost sold out and PE has very good loads (70-80%). Selling more seats to a lower average price apparently makes good business.
During the *A meeting in CPH this year TG vice president Wallop Bhukkanasut revealed that TG is considering increasing/double the number of flights to CPH as they are unable to meet the high demand for travel. According to the him the CPH route is the second most important TG route to Europe. TG does not have any available a/c's at the moment but a short term solution would be to extend the ATH-route to CPH as the load factor to ATH is only around 50%. For more details (sorry, only in Danish):
http://www.standby.dk/4435.0.html?&tx_standbynews_pi1[showUid]=23615&cHash=412d93d66f
Cheers,
Last edited by BHIL; Jul 19, 2007 at 10:04 pm
#15
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CPH
Programs: SK Diamond (*G), HH Gold
Posts: 580
Unless TG decides to copy this PE product to other routes I agree that it is highly unlikely that the number of seats in old F will be changed. But as a C-class pax demanding flexiblity it is unsatisfying not to be able to get a confirmed seat unless you book 1 week in advance.
I my company we now use PE when travelling on TG between Scandinavia and BKK as we can no longer be sure to get C tickets with short notice. Luckily TG seats Scandinavian PE passengers in J on connecting flights from BKK which makes it acceptable.