FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Technical Support and Feedback (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/technical-support-feedback-386/)
-   -   "Report Bad Post" Function Working? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/technical-support-feedback/332171-report-bad-post-function-working.html)

cactuspete Jun 25, 2004 10:50 am

"Report Bad Post" Function Working?
 
Is the "Report Bad Post" function working? I have reported several bad posts over the past few days, and have yet to receive a response.

dan at WebFlyer Jun 25, 2004 10:52 am


Originally Posted by cactuspete
Is the "Report Bad Post" function working? I have reported several bad posts over the past few days, and have yet to receive a response.

The feature does work... we receive and handle them on this end. If it requires a response, then we respond.

cblaisd Jun 25, 2004 1:00 pm


Originally Posted by dan at WebFlyer
... If it requires a response, then we respond.

Same, of course, with other boards. It's working fine and it's a good tool for the members and moderators to have for those posts that are truly "bad."

longing4piedmont Jun 25, 2004 4:31 pm

I reported one this afternoon and few moments the poster was banned. I have no idea if the report post function was what triggered it since it seemed to happen very quickly, but it appears to have helped.

cactuspete Jun 25, 2004 6:59 pm


Originally Posted by dan at WebFlyer
If it requires a response, then we respond.

Which, of course, begs the question of what requires a response. I trust that all of the helpful moderators would give the "reporter" at least the courtesy of a response, no? Thanks for your help, nonetheless.

myefre Jun 25, 2004 7:35 pm


Originally Posted by cactuspete
Which, of course, begs the question of what requires a response. I trust that all of the helpful moderators would give the "reporter" at least the courtesy of a response, no? Thanks for your help, nonetheless.


I gave you a 5, so cheer up.

SMessier Jun 26, 2004 9:50 am


Originally Posted by cactuspete
Last edited by cactuspete : Today at 1:03 am. Reason: To note that my 4 stalkers apparently didn't approve of the thread - they each gave it a 1-star rating :(

At least there's no reason to worry about the crybaby function which is obviously working fine. :rolleyes:

cactuspete Jun 26, 2004 10:01 am


Originally Posted by SMessier
At least there's no reason to worry about the crybaby function which is obviously working fine. :rolleyes:

One stalker revelaed. Do the other three also wish to come forward publicly?

SMessier Jun 26, 2004 10:44 am


Originally Posted by cactuspete
One stalker revelaed. Do the other three also wish to come forward publicly?

I think you might possibly be insane. No, really. :(

robb Jun 26, 2004 12:18 pm


Originally Posted by cactuspete
One stalker revelaed. Do the other three also wish to come forward publicly?

Not this kind of crap again! :rolleyes:

cblaisd Jun 27, 2004 10:03 am

This all seems very strange to me. I'm wondering if somehow, like with the whole reputation thing, if some votes somehow count more than others? Does the "weight" of a vote on a thread rating depending on who is the rater? It's strange that even if those 4 votes were 1's that the 13 other votes wouldn't bring it up more?

alanw Jun 27, 2004 10:09 am


Originally Posted by cblaisd
This all seems very strange to me. I'm wondering if somehow, like with the whole reputation thing, if some votes somehow count more than others? Does the "weight" of a vote on a thread rating depending on who is the rater? It's strange that even if those 4 votes were 1's that the 13 other votes wouldn't bring it up more?

Sometimes, the simplest answer is the best one.

cactuspete Jun 28, 2004 10:55 am


Originally Posted by cblaisd
This all seems very strange to me. I'm wondering if somehow, like with the whole reputation thing, if some votes somehow count more than others? Does the "weight" of a vote on a thread rating depending on who is the rater? It's strange that even if those 4 votes were 1's that the 13 other votes wouldn't bring it up more?

Who knows? More likely, it's just another "silly" game being played by the clique. I made the comment about the ratings thing because on 2 threads that I started that day, both had 4 ratings (each 1-star) within minutes of the thread being posted - -yet the forum page only showed 1 "view" on each thread (even after refreshing the page). Odd.

As for the Report Bad Post, I still have not heard from any of the moderators (there are 4 in the forum), having reported the bad posts 4 and 5 days ago, repsectively.

cactuspete Jun 28, 2004 11:02 am


Originally Posted by SMessier
I think you might possibly be insane. No, really. :(

Do the FT general TOS apply to posts in the Technical Issues forum?

myefre Jun 29, 2004 8:42 am


Originally Posted by cblaisd
This all seems very strange to me. I'm wondering if somehow, like with the whole reputation thing, if some votes somehow count more than others? Does the "weight" of a vote on a thread rating depending on who is the rater? It's strange that even if those 4 votes were 1's that the 13 other votes wouldn't bring it up more?


Right now it is 18 votes and 1.44 rating. I gave him a 5 and someone else, probably himself gave a 5. The other 16 are ones. That is 26 points divided by 18 votes = 1.44.

Kinda amazing how he got piled onto by everyone. :confused:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:39 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.