Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Community > TalkBoard Topics
Reload this Page >

a Spirit Airlines forum, it's time

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

a Spirit Airlines forum, it's time

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 18, 2013, 8:05 pm
  #106  
Moderator Hilton Honors, Travel News, West, The Suggestion Box, Smoking Lounge & DiningBuzz
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,023
All in favor?
.
.
.
.
.
Thought so
cblaisd is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2013, 8:13 pm
  #107  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
Originally Posted by gkbiiii
I think it is around the right time for their to be another vote, on the question of Spirit Airlines having its own forum. Thus I request a new discussion & vote on the above question.:-:
What has changed regarding the discussion of Spirit on FlyerTalk since the last time you made this request?

There has been no increased demonstrated need that I'm aware of. There have been no significant improvements to their FF program. I see few proponents of Spirit.

There should not be votes held just because one or a small number of people say "I want!"
Spiff is online now  
Old Jun 19, 2013, 7:03 pm
  #108  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Miami Beach, Florida
Programs: AA Plat, Sixt Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Platinum, Avis First, Caesars TR Diamond, Mlife Gold
Posts: 4,928
Forum Trial Period

As I said in the Ryan forum debate, if this has been discussed for over a half a decade, perhaps its time, to give Spirit its own forum. Why can't it at least have a year trial period; which seems fair for something that has been discussed for seven years???
gkbiiii is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2013, 7:25 pm
  #109  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SGF
Programs: AS, AA, UA, AGR S (former 75K, GLD, 1K, and S+, now an elite peon)
Posts: 23,194
Originally Posted by gkbiiii
As I said in the Ryan forum debate, if this has been discussed for over a half a decade, perhaps its time, to give Spirit its own forum. Why can't it at least have a year trial period; which seems fair for something that has been discussed for seven years???
Discussed for seven years...by how many people?
jackal is offline  
Old Jun 20, 2013, 10:13 am
  #110  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
Originally Posted by gkbiiii
As I said in the Ryan forum debate, if this has been discussed for over a half a decade, perhaps its time, to give Spirit its own forum. Why can't it at least have a year trial period; which seems fair for something that has been discussed for seven years???
Definitely not.

"I want!" is not "discussed".
Spiff is online now  
Old Jun 20, 2013, 12:05 pm
  #111  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,042
Originally Posted by gkbiiii
As I said in the Ryan forum debate, if this has been discussed for over a half a decade, perhaps its time, to give Spirit its own forum. Why can't it at least have a year trial period; which seems fair for something that has been discussed for seven years???
Just because one or two people discuss it for a long period of time does not mean there is widespread interest.

I'm not on TalkBoard, nor do I have any interest in these airlines, but here's a suggestion for you: Use the criteria the TalkBoard has developed for new forums, and make your case, politely, answering those questions, and do the legwork of figuring out how many threads discussing Spirit there have been in the last week, month, and 6 months or so. Use facts to make your case.

The following are qualitative criteria that the TalkBoard believes are useful to consider when evaluating proposals to create, close, split, or move forums. Whenever a forum change is discussed on the TalkBoard Topics, the TalkBoard encourages posters to fully address these criteria in addition to any other reasons supporting or opposing the change.

1. Will the forum be (or is it now) beneficial to FlyerTalk?

2. Will the new forum benefit a relationship with FlyerTalk? E.g., does the forum provide value for FT members, such as a friendly ear highly placed in the company

3. Is FT the best place to discuss this subject?

4. Is there a passionate following? This is essential in order to provide dedicated expert helpers to get questions answered.

5. Is a critical mass of posts and readers anticipated or existing? We need adequate traffic to keep everyone visiting frequently. One living forum is more valuable than two mostly dead ones.

6. Is this the best place on FlyerTalk for this subject? This is the classification issue. The answer depends primarily on achieving and maintaining critical mass. It also depends on whether or where the discussion might (or does) occur in the absence of the forum.

7. For proposals to split a forum, is the split expected to improve the signal to noise ratio? Why?
kipper is offline  
Old Jun 20, 2013, 8:17 pm
  #112  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Miami Beach, Florida
Programs: AA Plat, Sixt Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Platinum, Avis First, Caesars TR Diamond, Mlife Gold
Posts: 4,928
Originally Posted by kipper
Just because one or two people discuss it for a long period of time does not mean there is widespread interest.

I'm not on TalkBoard, nor do I have any interest in these airlines, but here's a suggestion for you: Use the criteria the TalkBoard has developed for new forums, and make your case, politely, answering those questions, and do the legwork of figuring out how many threads discussing Spirit there have been in the last week, month, and 6 months or so. Use facts to make your case.

You know, I used this advice and founded the Avianca/Taca forum!
gkbiiii is offline  
Old Jun 20, 2013, 8:58 pm
  #113  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,042
Originally Posted by gkbiiii
You know, I used this advice and founded the Avianca/Taca forum!
So, why not try it with this?
kipper is offline  
Old Jun 20, 2013, 9:27 pm
  #114  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 15,351
We could easily have a vote, but I'm not sure that, absent evidence or more support, it would pass.

I did some digging. We voted this down, 6-3, in February 2012. But the players on the TB are different now and I voted for it then, so...
RichMSN is online now  
Old Jun 21, 2013, 9:40 am
  #115  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,107
Originally Posted by kipper
Just because one or two people discuss it for a long period of time does not mean there is widespread interest.

I'm not on TalkBoard, nor do I have any interest in these airlines, but here's a suggestion for you: Use the criteria the TalkBoard has developed for new forums, and make your case, politely, answering those questions, and do the legwork of figuring out how many threads discussing Spirit there have been in the last week, month, and 6 months or so. Use facts to make your case.
kipper, I haven't seen a new case made by gbkiiii to justify a Spirit forum and not seen a lot of change since last year when this came up for a vote.

TB needs to know that a forum can sustain itself rather than be a rarely-populated forum. So looking at #s re: Spirit threads in the ONSAA forum:

June '13 (to date): 7
May '13: 5
Apr '13: 1
Mar '13: 2
Feb '13: 3
Jan '13: 0
Dec '12: 2
Nov '12: 4
Oct '12: 4
Sep '12: 3
Aug '12: 8
July '12: 9
Jun '12: 1
May '12: 3
Apr '12: 5
Mar '12: 3
Feb '12: 9
Jan '12: 8
Dec '11: 6
Nov '11; 4
Oct '11: 10
Sept '11: 2
Aug '11: 3
July '11: 6
June '11: 9
May '11; 2
Apr '11: 1
Mar '11: 5
Feb '11: 4
Jan '11: 6
Dec '10: 5
Nov '10: 2
Oct '10: 0
Sep '10: 3
Aug '10: 4
July '10: 4
June '10: 5
May '10: 3
Apr '10: 6
Mar '10: 6
Feb '10: 1
Jan '10: 1

Averaging all that out, it's approximately 3 threads a month for '13 (to date), just under 5 threads a month for '12 & 11, & a little over 3 threads a month for '10.

Based on the above, I'd be a no vote as I'm not seeing a forum that would generate enough traffic to be self-sustaining, vs Spirit threads staying in the current forum.

For the record, I don't hate Spirit, Easy Jet, Ryan Air or any of the other low cost carriers. I'm saving my ill feelings for Smi$ek.

Cheers.
SkiAdcock is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2013, 10:05 am
  #116  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 15,351
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
kipper, I haven't seen a new case made by gbkiiii to justify a Spirit forum and not seen a lot of change since last year when this came up for a vote.

TB needs to know that a forum can sustain itself rather than be a rarely-populated forum. So looking at #s re: Spirit threads in the ONSAA forum:

June '13 (to date): 7
May '13: 5
Apr '13: 1
Mar '13: 2
Feb '13: 3
Jan '13: 0
Dec '12: 2
Nov '12: 4
Oct '12: 4
Sep '12: 3
Aug '12: 8
July '12: 9
Jun '12: 1
May '12: 3
Apr '12: 5
Mar '12: 3
Feb '12: 9
Jan '12: 8
Dec '11: 6
Nov '11; 4
Oct '11: 10
Sept '11: 2
Aug '11: 3
July '11: 6
June '11: 9
May '11; 2
Apr '11: 1
Mar '11: 5
Feb '11: 4
Jan '11: 6
Dec '10: 5
Nov '10: 2
Oct '10: 0
Sep '10: 3
Aug '10: 4
July '10: 4
June '10: 5
May '10: 3
Apr '10: 6
Mar '10: 6
Feb '10: 1
Jan '10: 1

Averaging all that out, it's approximately 3 threads a month for '13 (to date), just under 5 threads a month for '12 & 11, & a little over 3 threads a month for '10.

Based on the above, I'd be a no vote as I'm not seeing a forum that would generate enough traffic to be self-sustaining, vs Spirit threads staying in the current forum.

For the record, I don't hate Spirit, Easy Jet, Ryan Air or any of the other low cost carriers. I'm saving my ill feelings for Smi$ek.

Cheers.
Fair enough. I really can't argue with your no vote.

As I mentioned in the private forum, I wonder how much activity there is across all these terrible, low-cost (in theory) airlines and whether the idea to split them away into a subforum makes sense. I'm away for the weekend, so I won't be doing *that* research anytime quickly.
RichMSN is online now  
Old Jun 21, 2013, 10:40 am
  #117  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
kipper, I haven't seen a new case made by gbkiiii to justify a Spirit forum and not seen a lot of change since last year when this came up for a vote.

TB needs to know that a forum can sustain itself rather than be a rarely-populated forum. So looking at #s re: Spirit threads in the ONSAA forum:

June '13 (to date): 7
May '13: 5
Apr '13: 1
Mar '13: 2
Feb '13: 3
Jan '13: 0
Dec '12: 2
Nov '12: 4
Oct '12: 4
Sep '12: 3
Aug '12: 8
July '12: 9
Jun '12: 1
May '12: 3
Apr '12: 5
Mar '12: 3
Feb '12: 9
Jan '12: 8
Dec '11: 6
Nov '11; 4
Oct '11: 10
Sept '11: 2
Aug '11: 3
July '11: 6
June '11: 9
May '11; 2
Apr '11: 1
Mar '11: 5
Feb '11: 4
Jan '11: 6
Dec '10: 5
Nov '10: 2
Oct '10: 0
Sep '10: 3
Aug '10: 4
July '10: 4
June '10: 5
May '10: 3
Apr '10: 6
Mar '10: 6
Feb '10: 1
Jan '10: 1

Averaging all that out, it's approximately 3 threads a month for '13 (to date), just under 5 threads a month for '12 & 11, & a little over 3 threads a month for '10.

Based on the above, I'd be a no vote as I'm not seeing a forum that would generate enough traffic to be self-sustaining, vs Spirit threads staying in the current forum.

For the record, I don't hate Spirit, Easy Jet, Ryan Air or any of the other low cost carriers. I'm saving my ill feelings for Smi$ek.

Cheers.
I'm in agreement with Sharon on this including being a "no" vote (and for saving my ill will for $misek but that's for another forum )
goalie is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2013, 11:18 am
  #118  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,107
Originally Posted by RichMSN
Fair enough. I really can't argue with your no vote.

As I mentioned in the private forum, I wonder how much activity there is across all these terrible, low-cost (in theory) airlines and whether the idea to split them away into a subforum makes sense. I'm away for the weekend, so I won't be doing *that* research anytime quickly.
FWIW - when the EJ/RA came up for discussion, I looked at a lot of the forums where the various LCC threads might be located & from a quick view of several of them, I didn't see a huge preponderance of threads re: them & they seemed to be ok in the current forums. We also have a Budget Travel forum, so perhaps it's as simple as moving threads to that forum if it's an issue. I'm inclined to think this is a solution in search of a problem.

Have a good weekend Rich - hopefully you'll be somewhere where it's not in the 90s & humid!

Cheers.
SkiAdcock is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2013, 11:27 am
  #119  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,446
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
We also have a Budget Travel forum, so perhaps it's as simple as moving threads to that forum if it's an issue. I'm inclined to think this is a solution in search of a problem.
Fully agree and would much rather utilize the forums we have available now before creating new ones though that's just MHO.
tcook052 is offline  
Old Jun 23, 2013, 6:20 pm
  #120  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Miami Beach, Florida
Programs: AA Plat, Sixt Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Platinum, Avis First, Caesars TR Diamond, Mlife Gold
Posts: 4,928
So why does Spirit and others deserve to be put into the "budget travel section"? There are more Spirit flights than Virgin America and others, yet it is just "budget"? There are much more posts about this airline that seem to be noticed by the TalkBoard body.
gkbiiii is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.