"Omni" versus "OMNI"
Oct 21, 2005, 9:53 pm
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saipan, MP 96950 USA (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands = the CNMI)
Programs: UA Silver, Hilton Silver. Life: UA .57 MM, United & Admirals Clubs (spousal), Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,039
"Omni" versus "OMNI"
Would it be possible to change the capitalization of the name of the forum, so that it matches the case of the other three forum categories to its left ("Miles & Points," "Travel & Dining," and "Community")?
The forum name is not an acronym or abbreviation, and there seems to be no valid reason to capitalize this one forum to the exclusion of all others. Indeed, it would seem to give unwarranted emphasis to Omni, when we know that the real reason this board exists is for Miles & Points.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ SPN
The forum name is not an acronym or abbreviation, and there seems to be no valid reason to capitalize this one forum to the exclusion of all others. Indeed, it would seem to give unwarranted emphasis to Omni, when we know that the real reason this board exists is for Miles & Points.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ SPN
Oct 21, 2005, 11:05 pm
#2
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
Ok, I'll pass this request on to the TalkBoard.
Oct 21, 2005, 11:27 pm
#3
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 68,927
"Omni" is not an English word, but rather Latin.
The generally accepted style for writing foreign words or phrases is to distinguish them but putting them in "quotations", by italizing them, to by writing them in bold face.
I can see where an acceptable alternative would be to write them in CAPITALS.
The generally accepted style for writing foreign words or phrases is to distinguish them but putting them in "quotations", by italizing them, to by writing them in bold face.
I can see where an acceptable alternative would be to write them in CAPITALS.
Oct 22, 2005, 12:31 am
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2000
Location: أمريكا
Posts: 26,763
No, I don't think writing them in capitals is an acceptable alternative, Dovster.
I'm in favor of maintaining the status quo, switching to title case, italic title case, changing the name to "Ominators" (prophets), or to "Omni-Genus" (of all sorts), or finally, I'd all find it acceptable to find a unanimously acceptable acroynm for which OMNI would stand.
I expect this topic and the candidates' positions on it, will be of keen interest to those FlyerTalk members who have not yet voted in the election.
I'm in favor of maintaining the status quo, switching to title case, italic title case, changing the name to "Ominators" (prophets), or to "Omni-Genus" (of all sorts), or finally, I'd all find it acceptable to find a unanimously acceptable acroynm for which OMNI would stand.
I expect this topic and the candidates' positions on it, will be of keen interest to those FlyerTalk members who have not yet voted in the election.
Oct 22, 2005, 12:37 am
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saipan, MP 96950 USA (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands = the CNMI)
Programs: UA Silver, Hilton Silver. Life: UA .57 MM, United & Admirals Clubs (spousal), Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,039
Originally Posted by Dovster
"Omni" is not an English word, but rather Latin.
The generally accepted style for writing foreign words or phrases is to distinguish them but putting them in "quotations", by italizing [sic] them, to by writing them in bold face [sic].
I can see where an acceptable alternative would be to write them in CAPITALS.
The generally accepted style for writing foreign words or phrases is to distinguish them but putting them in "quotations", by italizing [sic] them, to by writing them in bold face [sic].
I can see where an acceptable alternative would be to write them in CAPITALS.
While "omni" has a Latin etymology, the Latin word for "all" is omnis or omnes. "Omni-" as a prefix has become a standard part of English, listed in most dictionaries, and is not set apart from the remainder of the word by underlining or italicizing. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=omni
In any event, this background is no justification for capitalization.
Perhaps the capitalization was placed for emphasis, like the exclamation points in MilesBuzz! and CommunityBuzz!. However, when listed at the top of the page adjacent to the list of the four main groups of fora, it creates inconsistency. Also, it makes for usage problems, as referenced in a pointer-thread on this topic in Omni, so the users would be aware this issue had been raised in TalkBoard.
See "Omni" versus "OMNI" (Omni forum)
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=485106
Oct 22, 2005, 2:22 am
#6
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 15,978
What about a vote for "It ain't broke/don't fix ... ?" @:-)
Oct 22, 2005, 2:33 am
#7
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,735
Originally Posted by essxjay
What about a vote for "It ain't broke/don't fix ... ?" @:-)
Oct 22, 2005, 7:30 am
#8
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 44,553
It ain't broke, don't fix it.
Also, it's placement at the bottom of the list de-emphasizes its visibility, so this little stuff is all a wash. And if that's not enough de-emphasis, you can't even access it unless you've been around here a while.
TalkBoard should be addressing other things, IMHO.
Also, it's placement at the bottom of the list de-emphasizes its visibility, so this little stuff is all a wash. And if that's not enough de-emphasis, you can't even access it unless you've been around here a while.
TalkBoard should be addressing other things, IMHO.
Oct 22, 2005, 9:00 am
#9
Join Date: May 1998
Posts: 6,790
Originally Posted by apudme
here here!
Oct 22, 2005, 9:15 am
#10
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: IAH
Posts: 2,674
Originally Posted by SPN Lifer
Would it be possible to change the capitalization of the name of the forum, so that it matches the case of the other three forum categories to its left ("Miles & Points," "Travel & Dining," and "Community")?...
M8
Oct 22, 2005, 10:14 am
#11
Flyertalk Evangelist and Moderator: Coupon Connection and Travel Products
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Milton, GA USA
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite, Hyatt Discoverist, Radisson Elite
Posts: 19,040
Originally Posted by essxjay
What about a vote for "It ain't broke/don't fix ... ?" @:-)
Oct 22, 2005, 10:47 am
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Is something broken that this needs to be "fixed"?
If there's going to be a vote on this, can we have the Talkboard vote -- with a choice "for change", "against change" or "this change issue is a waste of time" -- rushed through before the election and get a published list of whom voted for which choice?
What's the next issue? Should GLBT Travelers have periods ( " . " ) in it (i.e., "GLBT Travelers vs G.L.B.T. Travelers)?
I think things are just fine the way they are.
If there's going to be a vote on this, can we have the Talkboard vote -- with a choice "for change", "against change" or "this change issue is a waste of time" -- rushed through before the election and get a published list of whom voted for which choice?
What's the next issue? Should GLBT Travelers have periods ( " . " ) in it (i.e., "GLBT Travelers vs G.L.B.T. Travelers)?
I think things are just fine the way they are.
Last edited by GUWonder; Oct 22, 2005 at 11:07 am
Oct 22, 2005, 8:47 pm
#13
Moderator: Hilton Honors forums
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marietta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 24,997
Originally Posted by SPN Lifer
Would it be possible to change the capitalization of the name of the forum, so that it matches the case of the other three forum categories to its left ("Miles & Points," "Travel & Dining," and "Community")?
The forum name is not an acronym or abbreviation, and there seems to be no valid reason to capitalize this one forum to the exclusion of all others. Indeed, it would seem to give unwarranted emphasis to Omni, when we know that the real reason this board exists is for Miles & Points.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ SPN
The forum name is not an acronym or abbreviation, and there seems to be no valid reason to capitalize this one forum to the exclusion of all others. Indeed, it would seem to give unwarranted emphasis to Omni, when we know that the real reason this board exists is for Miles & Points.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ SPN
What’s Your Point?
Oct 24, 2005, 10:51 am
#14
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Here! (Or there - I'm not sure)
Programs: Peon in all
Posts: 4,358
Originally Posted by SPN Lifer
Would it be possible to change the capitalization of the name of the forum, so that it matches the case of the other three forum categories to its left ("Miles & Points," "Travel & Dining," and "Community")?
Oct 24, 2005, 12:46 pm
#15
Founder of FlyerTalk
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 6,540
Just in from the did you know files:
The term OMNI as it is spelled and conceived was proposed and put forth by various members of the FlyerTalk in its earliest days. It was not included in the original version of FT nor was ever considered by myself. Changing the course of history that was originated by members themselves might be considered less than admirable. The point being - are you more right than they were? And while i am a bit fuzzy on the exact members involved, i seem to recall that PremEx might have suggested it? But i could be very wrong on that.
The term OMNI as it is spelled and conceived was proposed and put forth by various members of the FlyerTalk in its earliest days. It was not included in the original version of FT nor was ever considered by myself. Changing the course of history that was originated by members themselves might be considered less than admirable. The point being - are you more right than they were? And while i am a bit fuzzy on the exact members involved, i seem to recall that PremEx might have suggested it? But i could be very wrong on that.