If the main use case for the Smokers Lounge is to have very short threads with wiki-like posts rather than having active discussion threads, why can't the information for different locations/hotels/airports/etc. be collected and maintained in a wiki post in a larger and more frequented forum instead of having a separate forum?
As tcook052 pointed out, the more forums there are, the more fractured FT becomes. A separate "eating at JFK" forum targeted at a niche group and with individual threads for each restaurant would probably generate the same wiki-like threads as the Smokers Lounge. Separate niche forums for "eating at JFK", "eating at EWR", etc. would probably generate just as much traffic as the smokers lounge forum, and quite possibly even more traffic, but that doesn't mean that such forums should be started since the information can be collected in wiki posts in larger forums. The same applies to the wiki-like posts in the Smokers Lounge. Why not have a single wiki instead of a separate forum if the main intent is to inform rather than discuss? |
The forum reads as a rolodex of different locations/venues so perhaps if the format was loosened it might encourage greater discussion. Having a dedicated forum can instil a sense of community but I am wondering if the prescribed format (which works perfectly as thread wikis) is impeding the forum’s growth.
I think when a forum is created as place to encourage discussion and the anticipated discussion between members is not forthcoming then any questions concerning the forum’s future viability as well as alternatives should be considered. |
Originally Posted by Prospero
(Post 27013229)
I think when a forum is created as place to encourage discussion and the anticipated discussion between members is not forthcoming then any questions concerning the forum’s future viability as well as alternatives should be considered. The only discussion involved would be if a place which formerly allowed/disallowed smoking had a change in policy, in which case we hope that someone would update the thread to reflect this. (It is also helpful, in the case of an old thread, to announce that the hotel has not changed its policy.) Not only was no discussion expected, very little would be possible. The forum, if I recall correctly, does not permit discussion of the pros or cons of smoking, hence there is very little to discuss. If you let me know that I can grab a smoke between flights while connecting at a particular airport or what hotel in the city I am about to visit has smoking rooms, you have done me a great service. In return, I try to provide that service to other members of the community. It can even be a big service to those non-smokers who want to be certain of avoiding smoke. A wiki, in theory, might be able to handle this but they have never worked out as well as a separate forum on FT -- perhaps this is simply because most of us are used to, and like, the forum format. This is truly a case of "it ain't broken, so don't fix it". True, by its nature, it does not encourage a large exchange of views so the post count is low, but the view count for each thread is high -- proving that it serves its purpose. |
Originally Posted by Prospero
(Post 27013229)
The forum reads as a rolodex of different locations/venues so perhaps if the format was loosened it might encourage greater discussion. Having a dedicated forum can instil a sense of community but I am wondering if the prescribed format (which works perfectly as thread wikis) is impeding the forum’s growth.
I think when a forum is created as place to encourage discussion and the anticipated discussion between members is not forthcoming then any questions concerning the forum’s future viability as well as alternatives should be considered. Yes (to revisit the issue that was raised before) such posts could be in other hotel/destination forums but a) they would be much harder to search for (do I search for "smoke," "smoking," "smoker," or ??); and, b) the mods in other forums would get to clean up off-topic posts that posts/threads about smoking almost always generate. The forum is a useful and successful (judging from page views, as noted) forum that well-complements the library of information that is FlyerTalk. |
Originally Posted by JDiver
(Post 26999298)
Please: debate the post, not the members.
As the late Moderator magic111 used to say, "Play the ball, not the player". JDiver, Moderator |
Originally Posted by cblaisd
(Post 27014620)
The remit, description, structure, and protocols of the forum were explicitly approved by the Community Director. The forum is functioning exactly as she intended it, I believe.
Originally Posted by cblaisd
(Post 27014620)
Yes (to revisit the issue that was raised before) such posts could be in other hotel/destination forums but a) they would be much harder to search for (do I search for "smoke," "smoking," "smoker," or ??); and, b) the mods in other forums would get to clean up off-topic posts that posts/threads about smoking almost always generate.
Originally Posted by cblaisd
(Post 27014620)
The forum is a useful and successful (judging from page views, as noted) forum that well-complements the library of information that is FlyerTalk.
I actually have no desire to close the smoking lounge forum but when I see a forum that is struggling to take flight, I begin to ask questions, and try to make suggestions that might invigorate/improve the discussion numbers and density, and hopefully, encourage others who are probably much better placed than I and who possess the imagination necessary to step forward to make their own suggestions relating to how the forum can work better. |
Originally Posted by Prospero
(Post 27015368)
...when I see a forum that is struggling to take flight....
No, it's not "struggling." It gets plenty of page views. It's a useful forum for accessing information and has a structure/protocols explicitly approved (although you don't seem to be believe me, but maybe if goalie said it too) by the Community Director. Not every forum needs to get scads of discussion to be successful. |
Originally Posted by bdschobel
(Post 26997713)
Furthermore, I posit that Flyertalk should give more weight to people who want forums retained than to people who want forums removed. The latter group gains essentially nothing by getting their way. They can easily just not go to a part of this site that they see as unnecessary or redundant. The former group actually would lose something they value. Whose interests should Talkboard serve?
Bruce *I am a single straight non-disabled man with a cat who does not have a need to visit certain forums under Specialty Travel and I do just that-I don't visit them because I have not need to but it doesn't mean that I don't like them and want them closed Now (and at the risk of going OMNI) if one is an anti-smoker who wants the forum closed because they don't like smoking (not saying one is but throwing it out there), THAT is not what the forum is about at all and is spelled out in the forum guidelines.
Originally Posted by CMK10
(Post 26996342)
The Smoking Section serves an important niche on this website. The posts also don't really fit in in other forums, especially as they tend to draw irate criticism from militant nonsmokers while they're there. Posts above you seem to indicate people are happy with this forum, you can keep bringing it up every 9 months but I see no reason to close it and I don't think you'll find another TB member who does.
Though, elections are coming up, in case you want to think about campaigning on a closing of forums platform. |
Originally Posted by cblaisd
(Post 27017431)
Begs the question.
No, it's not "struggling." It gets plenty of page views. It's a useful forum for accessing information and has a structure/protocols explicitly approved (although you don't seem to be believe me, but maybe if goalie said it too) by the Community Director. Not every forum needs to get scads of discussion to be successful. It was created, has a tiny number of posts and a handful of views. A small number of people (more or less a majority poster and the moderators) defend it. I don't care if that forum lives or dies, but I'd enjoy seeing someone make a decent case that it's actually successful. The recent posts in this thread defending the forum haven't done that. |
If little used forums are being targeted, why just this one?
I looked at the women travelers forum and there is also very little posting activity. I think I counted 20 posts in the last month - and it was a busy month - normally there are fewer. But this forum also has a place in FT. I'm just curious as to why a forum with so many views and who has useful information is the target and not the rest that don't get much use. |
Originally Posted by Mary2e
(Post 27020007)
If little used forums are being targeted, why just this one?
I looked at the women travelers forum and there is also very little posting activity. I think I counted 20 posts in the last month - and it was a busy month - normally there are fewer. But this forum also has a place in FT. I'm just curious as to why a forum with so many views and who has useful information is the target and not the rest that don't get much use. |
Originally Posted by cblaisd
(Post 27017431)
Not every forum needs to get scads of discussion to be successful.
I appreciate both you and Dovster visit the forum, contribute and have expressed an interest in making it flourish. Do you have any suggestions on how to harness a hook, or address the issue of one way traffic? |
FlyerTalk doesn't DO closing sleepy and/or redundant forums.
It's just not a thing. |
Originally Posted by tcook052
(Post 27020820)
That's not the case Mary as I've brought other seldom used forums to TB's attention including the Gaming Loyalty forum which saw 28 posts in 2015 and was discussed here. It and the iDine forum see so few posts they should both be considered for closure as well so it's not just the Smokers Lounge that is being 'targeted'.
|
In my opinion, there's very little reason to close forums where the information contained in the forum doesn't fit easily anywhere else. The Smokers Lounge is a great example of that. Also, people keep coming here and saying how much they like the forum and why they like it, why isn't that enough for people?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:44 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.