Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Community > TalkBoard Topics
Reload this Page >

Voting Ended / Motion Passed: Creation of a Smoking Section

Voting Ended / Motion Passed: Creation of a Smoking Section

 
Old Jun 28, 2015, 5:08 pm
  #1  
Moderator, Hertz; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Hilton Contributor BadgeHyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: KRK
Programs: UA 1MM, BA GGL, Hyatt Glob, Hilton Diamond and others
Posts: 12,689
Voting Ended / Motion Passed: Creation of a Smoking Section

Moved by CMK10 and seconded by nsx :


TalkBoard recommends creation of a new forum under Special Interest Travel

1. titled: The Smoking Section
2. subtitled: Discussion of Practical Issues for Travelers who Smoke, Chew, or Vape




This vote will close on July 15, 2015 , at 6:30AM* EDT or after all TalkBoard members have registered their vote, whichever comes first.





Per the TalkBoard Guidelines:

A motion shall pass if at least two-thirds of the yes or no votes cast by TalkBoard members are ‘yes’ and a majority of the total TalkBoard membership votes 'yes' after voting opens 2 days after a site-wide announcement.

The purpose of posting voting topics in the public TalkBoard Topics forum is to solicit member feedback on any motions that are up for a vote and to allow for comments after a vote is made. It is at the sole discretion of the individual TalkBoard members whether they choose to post in the public discussion thread, there being no requirement to do so.

So while there is already a thread and discussion on this general topic and it is safe to assume that TalkBoard members have reviewed that thread, this thread is about this specific motion.

Please feel free to post questions, comments or any other sort of feedback in this thread or at: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/talkb...who-smoke.html


*will revise exact time once site-wide announcement is made

Last edited by jason8612; Jul 1, 2015 at 4:35 am Reason: Time updated for the vote
jason8612 is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2015, 9:42 pm
  #2  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,439
Oppose.
tcook052 is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2015, 1:21 am
  #3  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges and Environmentally Friendly Travel
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 22,210
A site wide announcement was posted a few moments ago. It will run for 2 weeks.

Prospero
Senior Moderator
Prospero is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2015, 1:31 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia / Brasov, Romania
Programs: A3*G, Hertz Gold Rewards President Circle, Best Western Platinum,
Posts: 15
In favour - helping smokers know where they can and cant can influence routing decisions
Transylvanian_Traveller is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2015, 1:59 am
  #5  
Moderator, Hertz; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Hilton Contributor BadgeHyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: KRK
Programs: UA 1MM, BA GGL, Hyatt Glob, Hilton Diamond and others
Posts: 12,689
At first I was against it, but I can see how this can be a problem to many travelers. My father smokes and I know how it is inconvenient for him to go out of a airport to smoke between connections or in a new city or hotel to smoke. I know the easiest answer is just don't smoke, but that just isn't a option.
So if this section can help with making it more comfortable to travel, then I am for it.
jason8612 is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2015, 4:58 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jersey Shore/YYZ
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Plat, Hilton Diamond, Hertz PC
Posts: 12,521
Oppose. Were this an aficionado forum like wine ir food..it might make sense. But not the current proposal.
aacharya is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2015, 5:28 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Programs: Virgin Atlantic Silver, IHG Diamond, Bonvoy Gold, Hilton Diamond, AA Platinum Pro
Posts: 1,386
I support the motion. This forum is supposed to help ALL of us with our travels. Can't think of any legitimate, non-political reason not to support this.

It's a legitimate issue and concern amongst travelers.

And for the record I do not smoke.
moe8555 is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2015, 5:58 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: RDU
Programs: Status Free
Posts: 214
In favor

After reading Dovster's points in the original discussion thread, I think there's a need for this.

And I don't smoke either
ediemac1 is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2015, 7:42 am
  #9  
Flyertalk Evangelist and Moderator: Coupon Connection and Travel Products
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Milton, GA USA
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite, Hyatt Discoverist, Radisson Elite
Posts: 19,037
I would oppose for the simple reason that the Talkboard is going against it long espoused expectations of showing demand elsewhere on Flyertalk.

There have been few threads on this subject over the years; and I do not hold that people are not posting because of perceived biases.

I believe that the current structure can hold current demand until there is sufficient demand to support a unique forum.

I also find the title not adequately descriptive..... why not cover all the choices in the title?
wharvey is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2015, 8:03 am
  #10  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,095
Originally I was against this, but after reading comments in the original thread:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/talkb...who-smoke.html

I'm inclined to support it (and I'm a non-smoker).

Cheers.
SkiAdcock is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2015, 9:25 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,591
Originally Posted by tcook052
Oppose.
(1) Why?

(2) More generally, will this proposed forum be one where (a) every destination-specific post will be redirected to the destination forum, or (b) will they remain in the segregated smoking room?

If (a), then the forum's utility will be limited.
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2015, 9:32 am
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,439
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
(1) Why?
As I've said in the discussion thread and as wharvey has said in this one I don't believe there is enough real demand to warrant forum creation.
tcook052 is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2015, 10:02 am
  #13  
nsx
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,617
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
(2) More generally, will this proposed forum be one where (a) every destination-specific post will be redirected to the destination forum,
That would defeat the purpose of having a single forum where smokers can exchange information about smoking restrictions. The smoking aspect is a narrower category than the destination.

I for one welcome and encourage discussion here of how the forum should be implemented. I believe that moderators will find it useful to read about the possibilities and members' opinions before these situations arise.
nsx is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2015, 10:17 am
  #14  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,877
In favor (and yes,I'm a smoker )
goalie is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2015, 11:35 am
  #15  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,198
I see no harm in having one.There are other forums on FT that cater for a much smaller minority of the travelling public than us smokers.

Having it would be a breath of fresh air.
HIDDY is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.