Forum suggestion: LAN please (Again)
#16
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DEN
Programs: Double OWE (AA EXP, QF Plat), FI Gold
Posts: 1,887
I agree. As most of us know tourism in the region is growing by leaps and bounds, bringing many new people to experience LAN, and requiring guidance with all aspects of the travel experience. Ditto to all of the stats and arguments JohnnyColombia has put out there, but who will "jump through the hoops" to get it done, as two of the top contributors to LAN conversations, JC and Eastbay, have already made it clear that they won't. I'd like to say yes as I feel strongly about it, but I need to see how time-consuming it is; I don't want to let anyone down by committing just yet.
#17
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Southern California
Programs: DL: 3.8 MM, Marriott: Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 24,575
As a current TalkBoard member, I voted in favor oa a LAN Forum when it was last up for a vote. And I'm still in favor of it.
Now we just need five...or more....other TB members who will also support it this time around.
And this thread is the best place to make a convincing argument for the forum. Many of the posts here thus far have been very helpful IMO.
Now we just need five...or more....other TB members who will also support it this time around.
And this thread is the best place to make a convincing argument for the forum. Many of the posts here thus far have been very helpful IMO.
#18
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,110
I was supportive of the LAN forum last time around (although I was not on TB then). I'm still supportive of it.
And what my fellow TBers don't know is that about a month ago I PM'd one of the FTers who was a major supporter of it & asked his input on it, or whether it should wait for the meger w/ TAM (LANTAM - something like that, which part of the LAN forum debate had discussed previously).
It took him a while to respond, but since he responded in a PM I need his permission to post his reply, but I think it was along the lines of waiting, but that could because I couched it in terms of where the last discussion had gone. My guess is he'd be supportive if we moved ahead.
Nothing to do w/ him or to do w/ TB not wanting to take up the issue, but I didn't raise it after getting his input because I came into my busy time at work & have been swamped with that. And am currently overseas on bizness.
It had been my intent to bring it up again once I got back/got caught up, so in the next week or so. Also have a few other things to bring up w/ TB, but didn't think it made sense to do so when I couldn't devote the appropriate amount of attention to FT/TB. Once I get this trip behind me, things slow down & you all will have my full attention again.
Cheers.
And what my fellow TBers don't know is that about a month ago I PM'd one of the FTers who was a major supporter of it & asked his input on it, or whether it should wait for the meger w/ TAM (LANTAM - something like that, which part of the LAN forum debate had discussed previously).
It took him a while to respond, but since he responded in a PM I need his permission to post his reply, but I think it was along the lines of waiting, but that could because I couched it in terms of where the last discussion had gone. My guess is he'd be supportive if we moved ahead.
Nothing to do w/ him or to do w/ TB not wanting to take up the issue, but I didn't raise it after getting his input because I came into my busy time at work & have been swamped with that. And am currently overseas on bizness.
It had been my intent to bring it up again once I got back/got caught up, so in the next week or so. Also have a few other things to bring up w/ TB, but didn't think it made sense to do so when I couldn't devote the appropriate amount of attention to FT/TB. Once I get this trip behind me, things slow down & you all will have my full attention again.
Cheers.
#19
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lima, Peru
Programs: LAN Commodore
Posts: 733
Yes, the Lan-Tam merger is almost a "done deal" now that the Chilean courts have given the go ahead. The new airline will be one of the largest in the world. Why wait? A dedicated Lan forum is a necessity. Its hard to believe that the Lan thread is hidden among other threads of relatively insignificant airlines. I trust that those TalkBoard members who I voted for (Cholula and SkiAdcock are two of those) will continue to support this effort. We are waiting for Sharon to come to Lima and try out the excellent J. W. Marriott here.
#20
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: PDX/AUS
Programs: AA-UA-AS IHG-SPG-Carlson
Posts: 4,562
I will take up this issue with my fellow moderators and while I dont think we have any extra clout with the TB, for what its worth I back this proposal 200%.... I think there is plenty of evidence showing that a dedicated forum does wonders for creating additional traffic and content generation.
#21
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Flew over the Equator 55 times last 3 years
Programs: LANPASS Comodoro (Emerald), others
Posts: 2,957
I can only assume what motivates FlyerTalk, but there is an opportunity here for FlyerTalk to be “THE” place to come for LAN and LanPass information, tips and help. There is a void out there right now, eventually someone will step in if FlyerTalk does not. A dedicated forum would highlight this, increasing posts in an ever upward spiral as the word gets around. Success breeds success. More posts, more prestige, bigger numbers... and I assume therefore increased potential for advertizing revenue for FlyerTalk... but maybe that is not what motivates FT, I can only assume.
#22
Ambassador: LATAM
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: PNA
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 4,648
Maybe what FT loses sight of is that FT is for people that spend lots of money on flights, credit cards, hotels etc. Either we are are independently wealthy, or more likely we have jobs. Not wanting to second guess Eastbay1K but perhaps he thought he was suggesting something that was good for FT as a whole, but he got treated as if FT were a forum for retirees that paint flower pots and as such have plenty of time to justify forums for which there is an obvious need.
As I said previously in this thread, I have one foot in the Eastbay1K camp. Suggesting a new forum seems to be more complicated than opening a Venezuelan savings account.
#23
Ambassador: LATAM
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: PNA
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 4,648
I think hoop jumping should not be required, there is already plenty of info and justification in this thread, I am sure shortly there will be even more.
#24
Ambassador: LATAM
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: PNA
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 4,648
As a current TalkBoard member, I voted in favor oa a LAN Forum when it was last up for a vote. And I'm still in favor of it.
Now we just need five...or more....other TB members who will also support it this time around.
And this thread is the best place to make a convincing argument for the forum. Many of the posts here thus far have been very helpful IMO.
Now we just need five...or more....other TB members who will also support it this time around.
And this thread is the best place to make a convincing argument for the forum. Many of the posts here thus far have been very helpful IMO.
Last edited by JohnnyColombia; Sep 12, 2011 at 1:43 pm
#25
Ambassador: LATAM
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: PNA
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 4,648
I was supportive of the LAN forum last time around (although I was not on TB then). I'm still supportive of it.
And what my fellow TBers don't know is that about a month ago I PM'd one of the FTers who was a major supporter of it & asked his input on it, or whether it should wait for the meger w/ TAM (LANTAM - something like that, which part of the LAN forum debate had discussed previously).
It took him a while to respond, but since he responded in a PM I need his permission to post his reply, but I think it was along the lines of waiting, but that could because I couched it in terms of where the last discussion had gone. My guess is he'd be supportive if we moved ahead.
Cheers.
And what my fellow TBers don't know is that about a month ago I PM'd one of the FTers who was a major supporter of it & asked his input on it, or whether it should wait for the meger w/ TAM (LANTAM - something like that, which part of the LAN forum debate had discussed previously).
It took him a while to respond, but since he responded in a PM I need his permission to post his reply, but I think it was along the lines of waiting, but that could because I couched it in terms of where the last discussion had gone. My guess is he'd be supportive if we moved ahead.
Cheers.
LAN as an airline is valid in its own right for inclusion with its own forum. Say the merger with JJ goes through in 18 months, then look at CO and UA as a reference for when LA and JJ would conceivably have a unified FF programme. 3 years? 4 years? LANpass is here and with us for the medium term at least.
When the IB forum was proposed I didn't notice one single person saying "Let's wait to see if IAG buys TAP" I didn't see anyone saying "Let's wait to see if IB plus merges with BAEC"
And if you take a look at the IB plus and BAEC forums over the last 10 days, you will see that FT has come into its own as THE place to discuss that unification that nobody mentioned beforehand.
I have never flown JJ, IF the LA JJ merger goes through, IF they put together a unified FF programme, IF that means LANpass changes alliances, and becomes an amalgamation of JJ's Felicidade programme with elements of LANpass. Where do Flyertalkers discuss such changes? In the Antarctica forum?
Last edited by JohnnyColombia; Sep 12, 2011 at 6:29 pm
#26
Ambassador: LATAM
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: PNA
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 4,648
Speaking of new posts and members for such a forum. Here is a charming example of Flyer Talk failure
This lady (whose husband is a OW Elite) came to FT with a luggage problem, posted it in the AA forum from where she got hoofed out to the LAN [non] forum and she never came back.
Fascinatingly, many of us come to FT because of LAN luggage problems, here is my first post on FT. Almost exactly the same issue.
This lady (whose husband is a OW Elite) came to FT with a luggage problem, posted it in the AA forum from where she got hoofed out to the LAN [non] forum and she never came back.
Fascinatingly, many of us come to FT because of LAN luggage problems, here is my first post on FT. Almost exactly the same issue.
Last edited by JohnnyColombia; Sep 12, 2011 at 2:06 pm
#27
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DEN
Programs: Double OWE (AA EXP, QF Plat), FI Gold
Posts: 1,887
Speaking of new posts and members for such a forum. Here is a charming example of Flyer Talk failure
Last edited by zpaul; Sep 12, 2011 at 2:18 pm
#28
Ambassador: LATAM
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: PNA
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 4,648
#30
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DEN
Programs: Double OWE (AA EXP, QF Plat), FI Gold
Posts: 1,887
Speaking of new posts and members for such a forum. Here is a charming example of Flyer Talk failure
This lady (whose husband is a OW Elite) came to FT with a luggage problem, posted it in the AA forum from where she got hoofed out to the LAN [non] forum and she never came back.
Fascinatingly, many of us come to FT because of LAN luggage problems, here is my first post on FT. Almost exactly the same issue.
This lady (whose husband is a OW Elite) came to FT with a luggage problem, posted it in the AA forum from where she got hoofed out to the LAN [non] forum and she never came back.
Fascinatingly, many of us come to FT because of LAN luggage problems, here is my first post on FT. Almost exactly the same issue.