Zimmerli pajamas closest to the LX F version?
Jan 29, 2020, 2:36 am
#106
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke on Trent, UK (MAN ), BUE, BKK, DBV
Programs: LH HON***,UA,BA.EK Gold,AV.
Posts: 11,632
While generally that might be culturally true, the LX F cabin is definitely not the place to live this out and even for european standards I find this quite inconsiderate.
I still think of this behaviour as quite degenerative, especially since the whole cabin is more often than not unwillingly witnessing it.
I still think of this behaviour as quite degenerative, especially since the whole cabin is more often than not unwillingly witnessing it.
Jan 29, 2020, 4:55 am
#107
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: LH M&M, BA EC, DL SM
Posts: 5,718
Jan 29, 2020, 5:49 am
#109
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: LH M&M, BA EC, DL SM
Posts: 5,718
Jan 29, 2020, 5:52 am
#110
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: London, Paris
Programs: LH HON, AF Platinum
Posts: 2,001
It's why I like the LX PJs even more. Genuinely a good pyjama for both sexes. I detest the LH womens PJs because the sleeve are 3 quarter and don't cover the lower arm, so it can get chilly there. I usually just ask for the mens version.
Jan 29, 2020, 6:03 am
#111
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke on Trent, UK (MAN ), BUE, BKK, DBV
Programs: LH HON***,UA,BA.EK Gold,AV.
Posts: 11,632
Jan 30, 2020, 5:49 am
#113
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: LH M&M, BA EC, DL SM
Posts: 5,718
There aren't enough of us (women, not supermodels) in F! I'd love to see the demographics of F flyers on LH and Swiss, but IME it's almost entirely full of men of a certain race and age. We need to represent.
It's why I like the LX PJs even more. Genuinely a good pyjama for both sexes. I detest the LH womens PJs because the sleeve are 3 quarter and don't cover the lower arm, so it can get chilly there. I usually just ask for the mens version.
It's why I like the LX PJs even more. Genuinely a good pyjama for both sexes. I detest the LH womens PJs because the sleeve are 3 quarter and don't cover the lower arm, so it can get chilly there. I usually just ask for the mens version.
Concerning the demographics: It is probably changing gradually, not much I could do about it.
Jan 30, 2020, 5:49 am
#114
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: LH M&M, BA EC, DL SM
Posts: 5,718
Jan 30, 2020, 9:27 am
#115
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke on Trent, UK (MAN ), BUE, BKK, DBV
Programs: LH HON***,UA,BA.EK Gold,AV.
Posts: 11,632
Jan 30, 2020, 9:59 am
#116
Moderator: SAS
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: BLL & CPH & ZRH
Programs: LX, SK EBD (*G)
Posts: 3,150
Being part of an F flying minority by being one of the under 30 year olds I'd suggest LH to pay subventions to us.
Or we could have the seats distributed to minorities.
Sarcasm aside, I think such an attempt would be the opposite of equality.
I'd argue that the distribution of the target market for LH F is quite similar to the one of the people actually flying F.
People in leadership positions in Europe that warrant flying F currently happen to be mostly white males in their 40s-60s.
This will most probably gradually change in the next few decades, but not in the near future. I think forcing this change might do more harm than good, as it is already happening naturally anyway.
Jan 30, 2020, 1:05 pm
#117
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: London, Paris
Programs: LH HON, AF Platinum
Posts: 2,001
I think the number provided by LH was 20%.
Being part of an F flying minority by being one of the under 30 year olds I'd suggest LH to pay subventions to us.
Or we could have the seats distributed to minorities.
Sarcasm aside, I think such an attempt would be the opposite of equality.
I'd argue that the distribution of the target market for LH F is quite similar to the one of the people actually flying F.
People in leadership positions in Europe that warrant flying F currently happen to be mostly white males in their 40s-60s.
This will most probably gradually change in the next few decades, but not in the near future. I think forcing this change might do more harm than good, as it is already happening naturally anyway.
Being part of an F flying minority by being one of the under 30 year olds I'd suggest LH to pay subventions to us.
Or we could have the seats distributed to minorities.
Sarcasm aside, I think such an attempt would be the opposite of equality.
I'd argue that the distribution of the target market for LH F is quite similar to the one of the people actually flying F.
People in leadership positions in Europe that warrant flying F currently happen to be mostly white males in their 40s-60s.
This will most probably gradually change in the next few decades, but not in the near future. I think forcing this change might do more harm than good, as it is already happening naturally anyway.
Jan 31, 2020, 10:43 am
#118
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: my heart is on the shores of the north Italian lakes
Programs: LX Senator Lifetime, Relais&Chateaux Club5C, ex ! "Amanjunkie", ex LHW LC, hate chain hotels
Posts: 2,515
And I am certainly not prudish, but simply considerate.
Feb 1, 2020, 12:40 am
#119
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: LH M&M, BA EC, DL SM
Posts: 5,718
Since the airlines give these trousers to be worn on board, your and their definitions of „prudish“ and „considerate“ may be different.
Feb 1, 2020, 10:07 am
#120
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: my heart is on the shores of the north Italian lakes
Programs: LX Senator Lifetime, Relais&Chateaux Club5C, ex ! "Amanjunkie", ex LHW LC, hate chain hotels
Posts: 2,515