4 hours tarmac wait no water for coach tons in business
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Programs: BA NON flyer, LH Frequent Traveller, V/A Gold, HGP Diamond, HHonnors Diamond, GHA Black
Posts: 605
4 hours tarmac wait no water for coach tons in business
LX 22 was stranded for 4 hours on the JFK Tarmac waiting for a gate to clear on Saturday 6/1/2018. The flight was totally full given the previous cancelled flight. I was sitted on row 23J with full view on business. After 1 hour wait I saw the crew moving many bottles of water out of coach into business. I assumed this was because business class hadn't any left. Shortly after my 11 year old daughter who had a bad headache asked for water but she was told there was strictly none left on the whole plane. I saw multiple people in business classe getting glasses of water on many other occasions but each time I was told they had just found some but that was it. When the gate was finally announced and there was just 30 mins left, the crew moved back 5-6 bottles of water from business to coach. During 3 hours, no one in coach got water after a 9 hour flight. Do you think this is acceptable? and just protecting high value costumers or is this morally wrong (at least give old people and children a bit of water in coach?)
#2
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: HAG
Programs: Der 5* FTL
Posts: 8,038
Morally, I think this is wrong.
Legally, I don't know. I don't think EU has any regulation pertaining to duty to care in case of tarmac delays (only airport delays) and I'm not sure to what extent does the US regulation apply to this case. However, DOT seems to indicate this should be covered, so you have grounds for complaint - worst case they will tell you this situation is not covered, best case scenario, you get some redress.
Legally, I don't know. I don't think EU has any regulation pertaining to duty to care in case of tarmac delays (only airport delays) and I'm not sure to what extent does the US regulation apply to this case. However, DOT seems to indicate this should be covered, so you have grounds for complaint - worst case they will tell you this situation is not covered, best case scenario, you get some redress.
During a tarmac delay, airlines must provide you with a snack, such as a granola bar, and drinking water no later than two hours after the aircraft leaves the gate (in the case of a departure) or touches down (in the case of an arrival).
#3
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Here there everywhere
Programs: Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hilton Diamond, IHG Plat, BA Silver, Aegean Gold, Aeroplan 25k, AA EXP
Posts: 2,825
Morally, I think this is wrong.
Legally, I don't know. I don't think EU has any regulation pertaining to duty to care in case of tarmac delays (only airport delays) and I'm not sure to what extent does the US regulation apply to this case. However, DOT seems to indicate this should be covered, so you have grounds for complaint - worst case they will tell you this situation is not covered, best case scenario, you get some redress.
Legally, I don't know. I don't think EU has any regulation pertaining to duty to care in case of tarmac delays (only airport delays) and I'm not sure to what extent does the US regulation apply to this case. However, DOT seems to indicate this should be covered, so you have grounds for complaint - worst case they will tell you this situation is not covered, best case scenario, you get some redress.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,038
report it to the DOT please. It is hard to believe they don't have enough drinks (water and otherwise) on the plane to serve all customers in such an event.
#5
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Report this to DOT. LX must obey US law on its US departures.
Unlike EC 261/2004, there is no payoff to you, but the carrier may be fined a substantial amount of money.
On a 4-hour delay, there is ample opportunity to reprovision bottled water and simple supplies and JFK has a contingency plan to do just this when IRROPS sets in.
Unlike EC 261/2004, there is no payoff to you, but the carrier may be fined a substantial amount of money.
On a 4-hour delay, there is ample opportunity to reprovision bottled water and simple supplies and JFK has a contingency plan to do just this when IRROPS sets in.
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Programs: BA NON flyer, LH Frequent Traveller, V/A Gold, HGP Diamond, HHonnors Diamond, GHA Black
Posts: 605
Yes I will report it to the DOT. It was actually not the coach team's fault, they were nice enough, but it was clearly a policy either by the airline or the maitre de canine. The flight was absolutely full given the previous had been cancelled and there just wasn't enough water to go through the whole cabin. However to decline providing water to certain passengers that really wanted some, to make sure business class has ample left sounds just plain wrong.
#7
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: my heart is on the shores of the north Italian lakes
Programs: LX Senator Lifetime, Relais&Chateaux Club5C, ex ! "Amanjunkie", ex LHW LC, hate chain hotels
Posts: 2,515
#8
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ZRH/SFO
Programs: A3*G - AZ CFP- HH DIA
Posts: 3,666
#10
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Milwaukee
Programs: AA Pl, KL Platinum for Life
Posts: 384
Report this to DOT. LX must obey US law on its US departures.
Unlike EC 261/2004, there is no payoff to you, but the carrier may be fined a substantial amount of money.
On a 4-hour delay, there is ample opportunity to reprovision bottled water and simple supplies and JFK has a contingency plan to do just this when IRROPS sets in.
Unlike EC 261/2004, there is no payoff to you, but the carrier may be fined a substantial amount of money.
On a 4-hour delay, there is ample opportunity to reprovision bottled water and simple supplies and JFK has a contingency plan to do just this when IRROPS sets in.
The OP mentioned they were waiting for a gate to clear. I think that means the LX flight was arriving NOT departing as you mention.
#11
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: HAG
Programs: Der 5* FTL
Posts: 8,038
#12
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Too many now to keep track of
Programs: A handful of shiny cards
Posts: 221
But if all off bays were occupied as well as gates, then apart from the aircraft taking off for another airport there’s not much to be done. It’s not as if ground staff can dock a set of stairs to an aircraft in the middle of a taxiway.
#13
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: HAG
Programs: Der 5* FTL
Posts: 8,038
I'm sure that if there is such a gridlock that nobody is moving for 4 hours, putting a set of stairs to an airplane on a taxiway somewhere is the least problem. After all, the plane isn't going anywhere anyway, stairs or not.
#14
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: ZRH / YUL
Programs: UA, TK, Starwood > Marriott, Hilton, Accor
Posts: 7,295
Essentially, no one is allowed to be on foot on a taxiway unless they are part of an emergency crew or have just escaped out of a burning jet down the slides...
#15
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SYD
Programs: Miles & More / Virgin Velocity-Gold
Posts: 392
LX 22 was stranded for 4 hours on the JFK Tarmac waiting for a gate to clear on Saturday 6/1/2018. The flight was totally full given the previous cancelled flight. I was sitted on row 23J with full view on business. After 1 hour wait I saw the crew moving many bottles of water out of coach into business. I assumed this was because business class hadn't any left. Shortly after my 11 year old daughter who had a bad headache asked for water but she was told there was strictly none left on the whole plane. I saw multiple people in business classe getting glasses of water on many other occasions but each time I was told they had just found some but that was it. When the gate was finally announced and there was just 30 mins left, the crew moved back 5-6 bottles of water from business to coach. During 3 hours, no one in coach got water after a 9 hour flight. Do you think this is acceptable? and just protecting high value costumers or is this morally wrong (at least give old people and children a bit of water in coach?)