Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Support&Services > Suggestions
Reload this Page >

Thought: Quoting someone you have on ignore should not be allowed

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Thought: Quoting someone you have on ignore should not be allowed

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2006, 11:07 am
  #1  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
Thought: Quoting someone you have on ignore should not be allowed

The way the system is set up if one has another poster on ignore one does not see the direct posts but can see when that poster is quoted. Some posters that use the ignore feature have a tendency of replying to the quoted part. The obvious problems with this are numerous. First and foremost it does not give the other party the ability to respond (lest someone else quote them). Second, it makes the system look very messy and disorganized. It's difficult to understand who is quoting who and under what context because quotes within a quote get lost by the system.

My suggestion would be to set a provision that states if you have a user on ignore, it should mean they are ignored.

Thoughts?
magiciansampras is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2006, 12:09 pm
  #2  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 68,921
I have only seen one member who makes it a practice to quote people he has on ignore.

He always makes a quote within a quote, in order to remind you that he is ignoring the original poster.

Example:

You would see a post made by Poster A which reads as follows:

Originally Posted by Poster B
Originally Posted by Poster C
One and one equals two.
My own feeling? Poster A makes himself look a bit ridiculous. What he is in effect saying is, "I don't want to read what Poster C has to say so I have him on ignore. When somebody else quotes him, however, I am not mature enough to pass up reading it."

I don't think that this is a big problem and should not be banned by TalkBoard.
If Poster A wants to make himself into a standing joke by this repeated behavior, that is his problem -- nobody else's.
Dovster is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2006, 12:25 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,788
Originally Posted by Dovster
I don't think that this is a big problem and should not be banned by TalkBoard.
Agreed, not to mention that attempting to create an automated solution to this problem would be extremely difficult in any but the most trivial cases.
birdstrike is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2006, 12:52 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 37,486
If it REALLY REALLY bothers you then consider installing Admuncher or Proxomitron and making a script to remove any content with references to certain members.
ScottC is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2006, 12:55 pm
  #5  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
Originally Posted by ScottC
If it REALLY REALLY bothers you then consider installing Admuncher or Proxomitron and making a script to remove any content with references to certain members.
Hrmmm.. that's an interesting idea.

One of the problems is that when someone quotes you through another person you lose what the original poster was quoting, so all the comments appear out of context.

But I'll look into Proxomitron, that's a cool idea.
magiciansampras is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2006, 12:55 pm
  #6  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
Originally Posted by Dovster
I have only seen one member who makes it a practice to quote people he has on ignore.

He always makes a quote within a quote, in order to remind you that he is ignoring the original poster.

Example:

You would see a post made by Poster A which reads as follows:



My own feeling? Poster A makes himself look a bit ridiculous. What he is in effect saying is, "I don't want to read what Poster C has to say so I have him on ignore. When somebody else quotes him, however, I am not mature enough to pass up reading it."

I don't think that this is a big problem and should not be banned by TalkBoard.
If Poster A wants to make himself into a standing joke by this repeated behavior, that is his problem -- nobody else's.
I think you're right. In the end it probably just says more about the poster(s) in question. Too difficult to implement anyway I suppose.
magiciansampras is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2006, 11:11 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,330
I recall Randy posting more than once the number of members who use the ignore poster function is incredibly small.

So I can't imagine this is an issue for more than a few members in 100,000+?
ozstamps is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2006, 11:20 am
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
If even 1% of FTers use the Ignore feature, I'd be surprised by a magnitude and then some. And of those using the ignore feature, probably mostly OMNI-users (including OMNI-readers) and then a sprinkling here and there. Best to keep things simple when it comes to rules.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2006, 4:23 pm
  #9  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,585
Originally Posted by Dovster
I have only seen one member who makes it a practice to quote people he has on ignore.

He always makes a quote within a quote, in order to remind you that he is ignoring the original poster.

Example:

You would see a post made by Poster A which reads as follows:



My own feeling? Poster A makes himself look a bit ridiculous. What he is in effect saying is, "I don't want to read what Poster C has to say so I have him on ignore. When somebody else quotes him, however, I am not mature enough to pass up reading it."

I don't think that this is a big problem and should not be banned by TalkBoard.
If Poster A wants to make himself into a standing joke by this repeated behavior, that is his problem -- nobody else's.
It's kinda funny that 'A' cant even read this thread since he has the originator on ignore!!!
kokonutz is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2006, 3:52 pm
  #10  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
This suggestion is beyond the scope of the TalkBoard.

This thread will be moved to Suggestions.

Thank you.
Spiff is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2006, 6:55 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by magiciansampras
The way the system is set up if one has another poster on ignore one does not see the direct posts but can see when that poster is quoted. Some posters that use the ignore feature have a tendency of replying to the quoted part. The obvious problems with this are numerous. First and foremost it does not give the other party the ability to respond (lest someone else quote them). Second, it makes the system look very messy and disorganized. It's difficult to understand who is quoting who and under what context because quotes within a quote get lost by the system.

My suggestion would be to set a provision that states if you have a user on ignore, it should mean they are ignored.

Thoughts?
Honestly? Who cares?

Personally, I think the "ignore" function is unnecessary -- if there was someone whose posts I didn't want to read, I wouldn't read them. If anyone doesn't want to read my posts, they can skip them.

This whole ignore thing strikes me as a bit immature -- like putting your fingers in yours ears and going, "Lalalalala, I can't hear your, lalalala."
PTravel is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2006, 7:33 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Programs: United, American, Delta, Hyatt, Hilton, Hertz, Marriott
Posts: 14,792
For me, at least, this issue isn't that relevant. I am not surprised that the ignore feature isn't used that much.
ContinentalFan is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2006, 7:35 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,645
Originally Posted by PTravel
This whole ignore thing strikes me as a bit immature -- like putting your fingers in yours ears and going, "Lalalalala, I can't hear your, lalalala."
I was just passing through this forum; never been here before but I agree with what you wrote above.
outtolunch is offline  
Old Jul 9, 2006, 9:37 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EX PLT
Posts: 1,428
Originally Posted by outtolunch
I was just passing through this forum; never been here before but I agree with what you wrote above.
If you need to put someone on "ignore", then theoretically, you would ignore them. IMO
spurg is offline  
Old Jul 9, 2006, 10:19 pm
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
Originally Posted by magiciansampras
My suggestion would be to set a provision that states if you have a user on ignore, it should mean they are ignored.

Thoughts?
Do you happen to have any examples of an instance when a FT member may have quoted someone they have on ignore? I'm not sure I can recall such a thing occuring.
PhlyingRPh is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.